Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Bioarchaeology of Dissection and Autopsy in the United States

Part of the book series: Bioarchaeology and Social Theory ((BST))

Abstract

This volume brings together a richly contextualized collection of studies that focus on the analysis and interpretation of skeletal evidence of dissection and autopsy in the United States. The chapters present a range of different contexts where these skeletal collections have been located including public cemeteries, hospital cemeteries, privies, wells, and trash middens. The approaches adopted by the authors in the volume are diverse and illustrative of how these data can be mobilized to address a variety of historical and anthropological questions. The significance of the bioarchaeological perspective is that researchers can establish linkages between social and political processes and biological consequences. While bioarchaeologists often examine these consequences as manifestations of the lived experience, the postmortem treatment of the body is also influenced by sociopolitical forces and institutions. This volume highlights how a holistic approach to the skeletal evidence of dissection and autopsy can inform a number of interrelated issues including the emergence of the medical profession, social welfare reform, and social inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, L. (1976). Grandison Harris, Sr.: Slave, resurrectionist and judge. Bulletin of the Georgia Academy of Sciences, 34, 192–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. (2002). A 19th century post-mortem specimen from Deal, Kent. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 12(3), 216–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angel, J. L., Kelley, J. O., Parrington, M., & Pinter, S. (1987). Life stresses of the free black community as represented by the First African Baptist Church, Philadelphia, 1823–1841. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 74(2), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, S. C., & Glencross, B. A. (2011). Building a social bioarchaeology. In S. C. Agarwal & B. A. Glencross (Eds.), Social bioarchaeology (pp. 1–11). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, R. L. (1997). A clandestine past: Discovery at the Medical College of Georgia and theoretical foundations. In R. L. Blakely & J. M. Harrington (Eds.), Bones in the basement: Postmortem racism in nineteenth-century medical training (pp. 3–27). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, R. L., & Harrington, J. M. (Eds.). (1997). Bones in the basement: Postmortem racism in nineteenth-century medical training. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakey, M. L. (2004). Introduction. In M. L. Blakey & L. M. Rankin-Hill (Eds.), The New York African burial ground skeletal biology final report (Vol. 1, pp. 2–37). Washington, DC: Howard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blessing, T., Wegener, A., Koepsell, H., & Stolberg, M. (2012). The Würzburg Anatomical Institute and its supply of corpses (1933–1945). Annals of Anatomy, 194(3), 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boston, C., Boyle, A., & Witkin, A. (2005). The human skeletal assemblage. In A. Boyle, C. Boston, & A. Witkin (Eds.), The archaeological experience at St Luke’s church, Old Street, Islington (pp. 128–277).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, C., & Webb, H. (2012). Early medical training and treatment in Oxford: A consideration of the archaeological and historical evidence. In P. D. Mitchell (Ed.), Anatomical dissection in enlightenment England and beyond autopsy, pathology and display (pp. 43–67). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, C., Witkin, A., Boyle, A., & Wilkinson, D. R. P. (2009). The human bone assemblage. In C. Boston, A. Boyle, J. Gil, & A. Witkin (Eds.), ‘In the vaults beneath:’ Archaeological recording at St George’s Church, Bloomsbury (Monograph No. 8, pp. 103–138). Oxford: Oxford Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, M., Berry, H., & Western, G. (2001). The people: Physical anthropology. In J. Adams, M. Brickley, S. Buteux, T. Adams, & R. Cherrington (Eds.), St Martins uncovered: Investigations in the Churchyard of St Martin’s-in-the-Bull Ring, Birmingham (pp. 90–151). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, M., Miles, A., & Stainer, H. (1999). The Cross Bones burial ground, Redcross Way, Southwark, London: Archaeological excavations (1991–1998) for the London Underground Limited Jubilee Line Extension Project (Museum of London Archaeology Service monograph series 3). London: Museum of London Archaeology Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugaj, U., Novak, M., & Trzeciecki, M. (2013). Skeletal evidence of a post-mortem examination from the 18th/19th century Radom, central Poland. International Journal of Paleopathology, 3(4), 310–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buklijas, T. (2008). Cultures of death and politics of corpse supply: Anatomy in Vienna, 1848–1914. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 82, 570–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, A. (2012). Morbid osteology: Evidence for autopsies, dissection and surgical training from the Newcastle Infirmary Burial Ground (1753–1845). In P. D. Mitchell (Ed.), Anatomical dissection in enlightenment England and beyond: Autopsy, pathology and display (pp. 23–42). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S. (1997). The findings of a possible reference collection in the grounds of a Victorian General Hospital, Nottingham, UK. Journal of Paleopathology, 9, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. (2000). Fragmentation in archaeology: People, places and broken objects in the prehistory of South Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlier, P., Huynh-Charlier, I., Poupon, J., Lancelott, E., Campos, P. F., Favier, D., et al. (2013). A glimpse into the early origins of medieval anatomy through the oldest conserved human dissection (Western Europe, 13th c. AD). Archives of Medical Science. doi:10.5114/aoms.2013.33331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherryson, A. (2010). In the pursuit of knowledge: Dissection, post-mortem surgery and the retention of body parts in 18th- and 19th-century Britain. In K. Rebay-Salisbury, M. L. Stig Sørensen, & J. Hughes (Eds.), Body parts and bodies whole (pp. 135–148). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, J. J. (2014). Scurvy in the Greater American Southwest: Modeling micronutrition and biosocial processes in contexts of resource stress. International Journal of Paleopathology, 5, 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, J. J., & Martin, D. L. (2014). The bioarchaeology of postmortem agency: Integrating archaeological theory with human skeletal remains. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 24(3), 429–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist, T. A., & Crist, M. H. (2011). Skeletal evidence for the dissection of children at the Philadelphia Almshouse, 1732–1834. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 144(S52), 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, T. A., & Sorg, M. H. (2014). Adult scurvy in New France: Samuel de Champlain’s “mal de la terre” at Saint Croix Island, 1604–1605. International Journal of Paleopathology, 5, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist, T. A., Sorg, M., Larocque, R., & Crist, M. H. C. (2004). Champlain’s cemetery: Skeletal analysis of the first Acadians, St. Croix Island International Historic Site, Calais, Maine. Report to United States National Park Service, Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, ME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossland, Z. (2009). Acts of estrangement: The post-mortem making of self and other. Archaeological Dialogues, 16(1), 102–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. M. (2007). “Resurrection Men” in Dallas: The illegal use of black bodies as medical cadavers (1900–1907). International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 11, 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, J. M., & Mitchell, P. D. (2015). A new method for identifying and differentiating human dissection and autopsy in archaeological human skeletal remains. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 3, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, W. N., & Schwarz, K. R. (2014). Partible, permeable, and relational bodies in a Maya mass grave. In A. J. Osterholtz (Ed.), Commingled and disarticulated human remains: Working toward improved theory, method, and data (pp. 149–170). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elizondo-Omaña, R. E., Guzmán-López, S., & De Los Angeles García-Rodríguez, M. (2005). Dissection as a teaching tool: Past, present, and future. The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, 285B(1), 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, P. E., Nizeye, B., Stulac, S., & Keshvahjee, S. (2006). Structural violence and clinical medicine. PLoS Medicine, 3, 1686–1691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C. (2010). Fractal bodies in the past and present. In D. Boric & J. Robb (Eds.), Past bodies: Body-centered research in archaeology (pp. 47–57). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, L., & Powers, N. (2012). Patients, anatomists and resurrection men: Archaeological evidence for anatomy teaching at the London hospital in the early nineteenth century. In P. D. Mitchell (Ed.), Anatomical dissection in enlightenment England and beyond: Autopsy, pathology and display (pp. 77–94). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garment, A., Lederer, S., Rogers, N., & Boult, L. (2007). Let the dead teach the living: The rise of body bequeathal in 20th-century America. Academic Medicine, 82(10), 1000–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, P. L. (2012). Parting (with) the dead: Body partibility as evidence of commoner ancestor veneration. Ancient Mesoamerica, 23, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowland, R. (2006). Aging the past: Examining age identity from funerary evidence. In R. Gowland & C. Knüsel (Eds.), Social archaeology of funerary remains (pp. 143–154). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauer, A. L., & McNamara, E. M. (1995). A piece of Chicago’s past: Exploring childhood mortality in the Dunning Poorhouse cemetery. In A. L. Grauer (Ed.), Bodies of evidence: Reconstructing history through skeletal analysis (pp. 91–103). New York: Wiley-Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauer, A., McNamara, E. M., & Houdek, D. (1999). A history of their own: Patterns of death in a nineteenth-century Poorhouse. In A. Grauer & P. Stuart-Macadam (Eds.), Sex and gender in paleopathological perspective (pp. 149–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, E., Hockey, J., & Howarth, G. (1999). Beyond the Body: Death and social identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, E. C. (2007). The poor, the black, and the marginalized as the source of cadavers in United States Anatomical Education. Clinical Anatomy, 20, 489–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, R. P., Thompson, J. L., & Martin, D. L. (2012). Hard labor and hostile encounters: What human remains reveal about institutional violence and Chinese immigrants living in Carlin, Nevada (1885–1923). Historical Archaeology, 46(4), 85–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilen, M. P., Hefner, J. T., & Keur, M. A. (2012). Life, death, and dying in southeastern Arizona, 1860–1880: Historical accounts and bioarchaeological evidence. In M. P. Heilen (Ed.), Uncovering identity in mortuary analysis: Community-sensitive methods for identifying group affiliation in historical cemeteries (pp. 105–164). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D., Collard, M., & Johnston, D. A. (1996). Archaeological evidence for 18th-century medical practice in the Old Town of Edinburgh: Excavations at 13 Infirmary Street and Surgeons’ Square. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 126, 929–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highet, M. J. (2005). Body snatching and grave robbing: Bodies for science. History and Anthropology, 16, 415–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, S. (2008). Capital punishment and anatomy: History and ethics of an ongoing association. Clinical Anatomy, 21, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, S. (2009a). Anatomy in the Third Reich: An outline, part 2. Bodies for anatomy and related medical disciplines. Clinical Anatomy, 22, 894–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, S. (2009b). Anatomy in the Third Reich: An outline, part 3. The science and ethics of anatomy in National Socialist Germany and postwar consequences. Clinical Anatomy, 22, 906–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, S. (2010). Lessons to be learned from the history of anatomical teaching in the United States: The example of the University of Michigan. Anatomical Sciences Education, 3, 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillson, S., Waldron, T., Owen-Smith, B., & Martin, L. (1998). Benjamin Franklin, William Hewson and the Craven Street bones. Archaeology International, 2, 14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, C. J. (2013). Non-bodies of knowledge: Anatomized remains from the Holden Chapel collection, Harvard University. Journal of Social Archaeology, 13, 122–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulkower, R. (2011). From sacrilege to privilege: The tale of body procurement for anatomical dissection in the United States. Einstein Journal of Biology & Medicine, 27(1), 23–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., Blinkhorn, P., Cannon, P., Hamilton-Dyer, S., Salter, C., & White, B. (2003). The excavation and analysis of an 18th-century deposit of anatomical remains and chemical apparatus from the rear of the first Ashmolean Museum (now The Museum of the History of Science), Broad Street, Oxford. Post-medieval Archaeology, 37(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D. C. (1973). Dissection and discrimination: The social origins of cadavers in America, 1760–1915. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 49(9), 819–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D. R., & Albanese, J. (2005). History and demographic composition of the Robert J. Terry anatomical collection. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 127, 406–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2005). Lives in fragments? Personhood and the European Neolithic. Journal of Social Archaeology, 5(2), 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B. (1986). In the shadow of the Poorhouse: A social history of welfare in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, M. (1979). Medicine and slavery: An essay review. The Georgia Historical Quarterly, 63(3), 380–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus, H. D. (2012). The bioarchaeology of structural violence. In R. P. Harrod & D. L. Martin (Eds.), The bioarchaeology of violence (pp. 29–62). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knudson, K. J., & Stojanowski, C. M. (2008). New directions in bioarchaeology: Recent contributions to the study of human social identity. Journal of Archaeological Research, 16, 397–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knüsel, C. J., Batt, C. M., Cook, G., Montgomery, J., Müldner, G., Odgen, A. R., et al. (2010). The identity of the St. Bees Lady, Cumbria: An osteobiographical approach. Medieval Archaeology, 54, 271–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusignan, K. A. (2004). A historical and osteological analysis of postmortem medical practices from the Albany County Almshouse Cemetery skeletal sample. Albany: University at Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. W., Owsley, D. W., & Shackel, P. A. (1991). A reconstruction of 19th century surgical techniques: Bones in Dr. Thompson’s privy. Historical Archaeology, 25, 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martensen, R. L. (1992). “Habit of reason”: Anatomy and Anglicanism in restoration England. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 66, 511–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. L., Harrod, R. P., & Pérez, V. R. (2013). Bioarchaeology: An integrated approach to working with human remains. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, A., Powers, N., Wroe-Brown, R., & Walker, D. (2008). St Marylebone Church and burial ground in the 18th to 19th centuries: Excavations at St Marylebone School, 1993 and 2004–6 (Museum of London Archaeology Service monograph 46). London: Museum of London Archaeology Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P. (Ed.). (2012). Anatomical dissection in enlightenment England and beyond: Autopsy, pathology and display. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P. D., Boston, C., Chamberlain, A. T., Chaplin, S., Chauhan, V., Evans, J., et al. (2011). The study of anatomy in England from 1700 to the early 20th century. Journal of Anatomy, 219, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molleson, T., & Cox, M. (1993). The Spitalfields project, Volume 2. The anthropology: The middling sort. York: Council for British Archaeology. Research Report 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, D. B. (2010). Lost within the Rubble: The archaeological findings from the Spring Street Presbyterian Church burial vaults. Northeast Historical Archaeology, 39(1), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, S., & Willoughby, W. (2010). Resurrectionists’ excursions: Evidence of postmortem dissection from the Spring Street Presbyterian Church. Northeast Historical Archaeology, 39(1), 134–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom, K. C. (2011). Postmortem examinations and the embodiment of inequality in 19th century United States. International Journal of Paleopathology, 1(3–4), 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom, K. C. (2014). The bioarchaeology of structural violence and dissection in the 19th century United States. American Anthropologist, 116(4), 765–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owsley, D. W. (1995). Contributions of bioarchaeological research to knowledge of nineteenth-century surgery. In S. R. Saunders & A. Herring (Eds.), Grave reflections: Portraying the past through cemetery studies (pp. 120–151). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persuad, T. V. (1997). A history of anatomy: The post-Vesalian era. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, S., Dudar, J. D., & Austin, A. (1989). Prospect Hill: Skeletal remains from a 19th-century Methodist cemetery, Newmarket, Ontario. Northeast Historical Archaeology, 18, 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, D., Henderson, G. A., & Killoran, P. (2009). Frankfort’s forgotten cemetery (Educational Series Number 10). Lexington, KY: Kentucky Archaeological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, D., & Worne, H. (Eds.). (2014). Archaeological investigation of the Eastern State Hospital Cemetery (1839–1861), Fayette County, Kentucky. Kentucky Archaeological Survey. Research Report No. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. (1987). Death, dissection and the destitute. London: Routledge & Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D. J. (1971). The discovery of the asylum. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappol, M. (2002). A traffic of dead bodies: Anatomy and embodied social identity in nineteenth-century America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitt, T. L. (1982). The use of blacks for medical experimentation and demonstration in the Old South. Journal of Southern History, 48, 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schug, G. R., Blevins, K. E., Cox, B., Gray, K., & Mushrif-Tripathy, V. (2013). Infection, disease, and biosocial processes at the end of the Indus Civilization. PLoS One, 8(12), e84814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, S. M. (1992). Body snatching: The robbing of graves for the education of physicians in early nineteenth century America. Jefferson: McFarland and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signoli, M., Léonetti, G., Champsaur, P., Brunet, C., & Dutour, O. (1997). Demonstration of a cranial autopsy performed during the Great Plague of Marseille (1720–1722). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences. Serié III, Sciences de la Vie, 320(7), 575–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer, J. R. (2011). Towards a social bioarchaeology of age. In S. C. Agarwal & B. A. Glencross (Eds.), Social bioarchaeology (pp. 285–311). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solano, M. (2006). The life stresses of poverty: Skeletal and historical indicators of activity patterns in the Albany County Almshouse skeletal collection 1825–1925. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, S. (2008). The extraordinary history of Oliver Cromwell’s head. In D. Borić & J. Robb (Eds.), Past bodies: Body-centered research in archaeology (pp. 69–78). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, T. A. (2014). Agency, ‘Til Death Do Us Part? Inquiring about the Agency of Dead Bodies from the Ancient Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 24(3):437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tward, A. D., & Patterson, H. A. (2002). From grave robbing to gifting: Cadaver supply in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(9), 1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentin, F., & d’Errico, F. (1995). Skeletal evidence of operations on cadavers from Sens (Yonne, France) at the end of the XVth century. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 98(3), 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, T., & Rogers, J. (1988). Iatrogenic paleopathology. Journal of Paleopathology, 1(3), 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, H. A. (2006). Medical apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on black Americans from colonial times to the present. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesolowsky, A. B. (1991). The osteology of the Uxbridge paupers. In J. Elia & A. B. Wesolowsky (Eds.), Archaeological excavations at the Uxbridge Almshouse burial ground in Uxbridge, Massachusetts (pp. 230–253). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, A. G. (2012). A star of the first magnitude: Osteological and historical evidence for the challenge of provincial medicine at the Worcester Royal Infirmary in the nineteenth century. In P. D. Mitchell (Ed.), Anatomical dissection in enlightenment England and beyond: Autopsy, pathology and display (pp. 23–41). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, A., & Bekvalac, J. (2015). Digital radiography and historical contextualisation of the 19th century modified human skeletal remains from the Worcester Royal Infirmary, England. International Journal of Paleopathology, 10, 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would first like to acknowledge and thank the contributors for responding so well and so patiently to my many comments and deadline remainders. I thank Teresa Kraus and Hana Nagdimov at Springer and Deb Martin for their patience and help getting this volume through the publication process. Lastly, I thank the many colleagues that provided thoughtful and useful feedback on all of the research presented in this volume.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at New Paltz, 1 Hawk Drive, New Paltz, NY, 12561, USA

    Kenneth C. Nystrom

Authors
  1. Kenneth C. Nystrom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth C. Nystrom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at New Paltz, New Paltz, NY, USA

    Kenneth C. Nystrom

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nystrom, K.C. (2017). Introduction. In: Nystrom, K. (eds) The Bioarchaeology of Dissection and Autopsy in the United States. Bioarchaeology and Social Theory. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26836-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26836-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26834-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26836-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation