Skip to main content

Cross-Frequency Modulation, Network Information Integration and Cognitive Performance in Complex Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards a Post-Bertalanffy Systemics

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

  • 712 Accesses

Abstract

The higher cognitive processes cannot be explained by processes of sequential neural activation and new systemic approaches to the study of electroencephalographic correlates of cognition are presently proposed. As the mental activity appears to be the result of a systemic integration of different neural network activities (brain networks, BNet), the associated mutual interaction between different frequency bands generates the phenomenon of cross-frequency modulation (CfM) that supports the synchronization and the coordination of the high-frequency activity of distant brain areas. Within this paper we present two kinds of evidence supporting the key role of CfM in allowing the above mentioned integration, one coming from experimental EEG data concerning human subjects, and the other coming from computer simulations of models of brain network activity. As concerns the experimental evidence in 8 subjects, aged between 20 and 51 years old, not suffering of any psychopathology or neurological disorders, EEG activity was recorded during the execution of a cognitive task in which they were asked to identify the non-previously known criteria used by the computer to classify some presented images. The study of the Event Related Potentials (ERPs) showed a longer latency in responses following an error. Independent EEG components with a strong fit with a dipole model were identified and CfM of these components was computed either independently from the stimulus and related to the stimulus and to the subject response. The obtained results were consistent with the role of CfM in the functional activation of BNets and with the subject cognitive performance. Some computer simulations of the activity of networks of Integrate-and-fire neurons were also carried out. The latter showed that the presence of synchronization between neuron activities was facilitated by the presence of long-range synaptic interactions, periodicity of the stimulus inputs, adaptation of the neuronal threshold and presence of inhibitory synapses. We found also evidence of the key role played by network connectivity structure. Namely, both theoretical arguments and simulation results agreed in showing that, in the case of external discontinuous stimuli the scale-free networks are more likely to manifest a high frequency resonance phenomena coupled with persistent low frequency oscillations. All these data are supporting the role of CfM in the functional integration of complex networks and suggest that this phenomenon could be typical of a large number of other complex systems such as, e.g., the social networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albert, R., & Barábasi, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, E. A., Liu, J., Kiehl, K. A., Gelemter, J., Pearlson G. D., Perrone-Bizzozero, N. I., & Calhoun, V. D. (2011). Components of cross-frequency modulation in health and disease. Frontiers in Systems Neurosciences, 5, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bressler, S. L., & Menon, V. (2010). Large-scale brain networks in cognition: Emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunel, N. (2000). Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 8, 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brunel, N., & Hakim, V. (2008). Sparsely synchronized neuronal oscillations. Chaos, 18, 015113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Canolty, R. T., & Knight, R. T. (2010). The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(11), 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Da Rocha, E. L., & da Cunha, C. R. (2011). The transition from fracton to phonon states in a Sierpinski triangle lattice. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 44, 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber, W. R., Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., & Doppelmayr, M. (2005). Alpha phase synchronization predicts P1 and N1 latency and amplitude size. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He, B. J., Zempel, J. M., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E. (2010). The temporal structures and functional significance of scale-free brain activity. Neuron, 66, 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klimesch, W., Schackb, B., Schabusa, M., Doppelmayr, M., Gruber, W., & Sauseng, P. (2004). Phase-locked alpha and theta oscillations generate the P1-N1 complex and are related to memory performance. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 302–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, T. J., & Rinzel, J. (2003). Dynamics of spiking neurons connected by both inhibitory and electrical coupling. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 14, 283–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meehan, T. P., & Bressler, S. L. (2012). Neurocognitive networks: Findings, models, and theory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2232–2247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Melloni, L., Molina, C., Peña, M., Torres, D., Singer, W., & Rodriguez, E. (2007). Synchronization of neural activity across cortical areas correlates with conscious perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(11), 2858–2865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muller, V., & Anokhin, A. P. (2012). Neural synchrony during response production and inhibition. PLoS One, 7(6), e38931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ostojic, S., Brunel, N. & Hakim, V. (2009). Synchronization properties of networks of electrically coupled neurons in the presence of noise and heterogeneities. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 26, 369–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Park, H.-J., & Friston, K. (2013). Structural and functional brain networks: From connections to cognition. Science, 342, 1238411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peña, M., & Melloni, L. (2012). Brain oscillations during spoken sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1149–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raichle, M. E. (2011). The restless brain. Brain Connectivity, 1(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sporns, O. (2010). Networks of the brain. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steinke, G. K., & Galan, R. F. (2011). Brain rhythms reveal a hierarchical network organization. PLoS Computational Biology, 7(10), e1002207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tononi, G. (2010). Information integration: Its relevance to brain function and consciousness. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 148, 299–322.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tort, A. B., Komorowski, R. W., Manns, J. R., Kopell, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (2009). Theta-gamma coupling increases during the learning of item-context associations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 20942–20947.

    Google Scholar 

  23. van Hemmen, J. L., & Sejnowski, T. J. (Eds.). (2006). 23 problems in systems neuroscience. Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  24. von Stein, A., & Sarnthein, J. (2000). Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: From local gamma to long range alpha theta synchronization. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yeung, N., Bogacz, R., Holroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., & Cohen, J. D. (2007). Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity. Psychophysiology, 44, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zamora-Lopez, G., Xhou, C., & Kurths, L. (2011). Exploring brain function from anatomical connectivity. Frontiers in Neurosciences, 5(83), e2011.00083.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pier Luigi Marconi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marconi, P.L., Bandinelli, P.L., Penna, M.P., Pessa, E. (2016). Cross-Frequency Modulation, Network Information Integration and Cognitive Performance in Complex Systems. In: Minati, G., Abram, M., Pessa, E. (eds) Towards a Post-Bertalanffy Systemics. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24391-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics