Abstract
The higher cognitive processes cannot be explained by processes of sequential neural activation and new systemic approaches to the study of electroencephalographic correlates of cognition are presently proposed. As the mental activity appears to be the result of a systemic integration of different neural network activities (brain networks, BNet), the associated mutual interaction between different frequency bands generates the phenomenon of cross-frequency modulation (CfM) that supports the synchronization and the coordination of the high-frequency activity of distant brain areas. Within this paper we present two kinds of evidence supporting the key role of CfM in allowing the above mentioned integration, one coming from experimental EEG data concerning human subjects, and the other coming from computer simulations of models of brain network activity. As concerns the experimental evidence in 8 subjects, aged between 20 and 51 years old, not suffering of any psychopathology or neurological disorders, EEG activity was recorded during the execution of a cognitive task in which they were asked to identify the non-previously known criteria used by the computer to classify some presented images. The study of the Event Related Potentials (ERPs) showed a longer latency in responses following an error. Independent EEG components with a strong fit with a dipole model were identified and CfM of these components was computed either independently from the stimulus and related to the stimulus and to the subject response. The obtained results were consistent with the role of CfM in the functional activation of BNets and with the subject cognitive performance. Some computer simulations of the activity of networks of Integrate-and-fire neurons were also carried out. The latter showed that the presence of synchronization between neuron activities was facilitated by the presence of long-range synaptic interactions, periodicity of the stimulus inputs, adaptation of the neuronal threshold and presence of inhibitory synapses. We found also evidence of the key role played by network connectivity structure. Namely, both theoretical arguments and simulation results agreed in showing that, in the case of external discontinuous stimuli the scale-free networks are more likely to manifest a high frequency resonance phenomena coupled with persistent low frequency oscillations. All these data are supporting the role of CfM in the functional integration of complex networks and suggest that this phenomenon could be typical of a large number of other complex systems such as, e.g., the social networks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albert, R., & Barábasi, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47–97.
Allen, E. A., Liu, J., Kiehl, K. A., Gelemter, J., Pearlson G. D., Perrone-Bizzozero, N. I., & Calhoun, V. D. (2011). Components of cross-frequency modulation in health and disease. Frontiers in Systems Neurosciences, 5, 1–16.
Bressler, S. L., & Menon, V. (2010). Large-scale brain networks in cognition: Emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 277–290.
Brunel, N. (2000). Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 8, 183–208.
Brunel, N., & Hakim, V. (2008). Sparsely synchronized neuronal oscillations. Chaos, 18, 015113.
Canolty, R. T., & Knight, R. T. (2010). The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(11), 506–515.
Da Rocha, E. L., & da Cunha, C. R. (2011). The transition from fracton to phonon states in a Sierpinski triangle lattice. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 44, 241–247.
Gruber, W. R., Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., & Doppelmayr, M. (2005). Alpha phase synchronization predicts P1 and N1 latency and amplitude size. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 371–377.
He, B. J., Zempel, J. M., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E. (2010). The temporal structures and functional significance of scale-free brain activity. Neuron, 66, 353–369.
Klimesch, W., Schackb, B., Schabusa, M., Doppelmayr, M., Gruber, W., & Sauseng, P. (2004). Phase-locked alpha and theta oscillations generate the P1-N1 complex and are related to memory performance. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 302–316.
Lewis, T. J., & Rinzel, J. (2003). Dynamics of spiking neurons connected by both inhibitory and electrical coupling. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 14, 283–309.
Meehan, T. P., & Bressler, S. L. (2012). Neurocognitive networks: Findings, models, and theory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2232–2247.
Melloni, L., Molina, C., Peña, M., Torres, D., Singer, W., & Rodriguez, E. (2007). Synchronization of neural activity across cortical areas correlates with conscious perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(11), 2858–2865
Muller, V., & Anokhin, A. P. (2012). Neural synchrony during response production and inhibition. PLoS One, 7(6), e38931.
Ostojic, S., Brunel, N. & Hakim, V. (2009). Synchronization properties of networks of electrically coupled neurons in the presence of noise and heterogeneities. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 26, 369–392.
Park, H.-J., & Friston, K. (2013). Structural and functional brain networks: From connections to cognition. Science, 342, 1238411.
Peña, M., & Melloni, L. (2012). Brain oscillations during spoken sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1149–1164.
Raichle, M. E. (2011). The restless brain. Brain Connectivity, 1(1), 3–12.
Sporns, O. (2010). Networks of the brain. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Steinke, G. K., & Galan, R. F. (2011). Brain rhythms reveal a hierarchical network organization. PLoS Computational Biology, 7(10), e1002207.
Tononi, G. (2010). Information integration: Its relevance to brain function and consciousness. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 148, 299–322.
Tort, A. B., Komorowski, R. W., Manns, J. R., Kopell, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (2009). Theta-gamma coupling increases during the learning of item-context associations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 20942–20947.
van Hemmen, J. L., & Sejnowski, T. J. (Eds.). (2006). 23 problems in systems neuroscience. Oxford University Press: New York.
von Stein, A., & Sarnthein, J. (2000). Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: From local gamma to long range alpha theta synchronization. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38, 301–313.
Yeung, N., Bogacz, R., Holroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., & Cohen, J. D. (2007). Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity. Psychophysiology, 44, 39–49.
Zamora-Lopez, G., Xhou, C., & Kurths, L. (2011). Exploring brain function from anatomical connectivity. Frontiers in Neurosciences, 5(83), e2011.00083.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marconi, P.L., Bandinelli, P.L., Penna, M.P., Pessa, E. (2016). Cross-Frequency Modulation, Network Information Integration and Cognitive Performance in Complex Systems. In: Minati, G., Abram, M., Pessa, E. (eds) Towards a Post-Bertalanffy Systemics. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24391-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24391-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24389-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24391-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)