Skip to main content

A Comparison of Decoding Strategies for the 0/1 Multi-objective Unit Commitment Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9018))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the single objective Unit Commitment Problem (UCP) the problem is usually separated in two sub-problems : the commitment problem which aims to fix the on/off scheduling of each unit and the dispatching problem which goal is to schedule the production of each turned on unit. The dispatching problem is a continuous convex problem that can easily be solved exactly. For the first sub-problem genetic algorithms (GA) are often applied and usually handle binary vectors representing the solutions of the commitment problem.Then the solutions are decoded in solving the dispatching problem with an exact method to obtain the precise production of each unit. In this paper a multi-objective version of the UCP taking the emission of gas into account is presented. In this multi objective UCP the dispatching problem remains easy to solve whereas considering it separatly remains interesting. A multi-objective GA handling binary vectors is applied. However for a binary representation there is a set of solutions of the dispatching problem that are pareto equivalent. Three decoding strategies are proposed and compared. The main contribution of this paper is the third decoding strategy which attaches an approximation of the Pareto front from the associated dispatching problem to each genotypic solution. It is shown that this decoding strategy leads to better results in comparison to the other ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bleuler, S., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., Zitzler, E.: PISA – A Platform and Programming Language Independent Interface for Search Algorithms. In: Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J., Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L. (eds.) EMO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2632, pp. 494–508. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Catalao, J., Mariano, S., Mendes, V., Ferreira, L.: A practical approach for profit-based unit commitment with emission limitations. International journal of electrical power & energy systems 32(3), 218–224 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Damousis, I.G., Bakirtzis, A.G., Dokopoulos, P.S.: A solution to the unit-commitment problem using integer-coded genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 19(2), 1165–1172 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrgott, M.: Multicriteria optimization, vol. 2. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guan, X., Zhai, Q., Papalexopoulos, A.: Optimization based methods for unit commitment: Lagrangian relaxation versus general mixed integer programming. In: Power Engineering Society General Meeting, vol. 2. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jeong, Y.W., Park, J.B., Shin, J.R., Lee, K.Y.: A thermal unit commitment approach using an improved quantum evolutionary algorithm. Electric Power Components and Systems 37(7), 770–786 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kazarlis, S.A., Bakirtzis, A., Petridis, V.: A genetic algorithm solution to the unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 11(1), 83–92 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Knowles, J., Thiele, L., Zitzler, E.: A Tutorial on the Performance Assessment of Stochastic Multiobjective Optimizers. TIK Report 214, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), ETH Zurich, February 2006

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lau, T., Chung, C., Wong, K., Chung, T., Ho, S.: Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm approach for unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 24(3), 1503–1512 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liefooghe, A., Jourdan, L., Talbi, E.G.: A software framework based on a conceptual unified model for evolutionary multiobjective optimization: Paradiseo-moeo. European Journal of Operational Research 209(2), 104–112 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. López-Ibáñez, M., Dubois-Lacoste, J., Stützle, T., Birattari, M.: The irace package, iterated race for automatic algorithm configuration. Tech. rep, IRIDIA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. de Moura Gomes Viana, A.M.M.: Metaheuristics for the Unit Commitment Problem The Constraint Oriented Neighbourhoods Search Strategy. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saramourtsis, A., Damousis, J., Bakirtzis, A., Dokopoulos, P.: Genetic algorithm solution to the economic dispatch problem–application to the electrical power grid of crete island. In: Proc. Workshop Machine Learning Applications to Power Systems (ACAI), pp. 308–317 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Srinivasan, D., Tettamanzi, A.G.: An evolutionary algorithm for evaluation of emission compliance options in view of the clean air act amendments. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 12(1), 336–341 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Swarup, K., Yamashiro, S.: Unit commitment solution methodology using genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 17(1), 87–91 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, X.H., Zhao, J.Q., Chen, X.Y.: Multi-objective unit commitment fuzzy modeling and optimization for energy-saving and emission reduction. In: Proceedings of the CSEE 22, 71–76 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie Jacquin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jacquin, S., Mousin, L., Machado, I., Talbi, EG., Jourdan, L. (2015). A Comparison of Decoding Strategies for the 0/1 Multi-objective Unit Commitment Problem. In: Gaspar-Cunha, A., Henggeler Antunes, C., Coello, C. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15934-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15934-8_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15933-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15934-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics