Skip to main content
Log in

Improved real-coded genetic algorithm solution for unit commitment problem considering energy saving and emission reduction demands

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unit commitment (UC), as a typical optimization problem in electric power system, faces new challenges as energy saving and emission reduction get more and more important in the way to a more environmentally friendly society. To meet these challenges, we propose a UC model considering energy saving and emission reduction. By using real-number coding method, swap-window and hill-climbing operators, we present an improved real-coded genetic algorithm (IRGA) for UC. Compared with other algorithms approach to the proposed UC problem, the IRGA solution shows an improvement in effectiveness and computational time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a i , b i , c i :

Energy consumption function parameters of the ith unit

CSC i :

Cold start-up cost of the ith unit

CST i :

Cold start-up time of the ith unit

\(D_{R_i }\) :

Down ramp limit of the ith unit, MW/h

D t :

Demand during hour t, MW

G :

Number of units

HSC i :

Hot start-up cost of the ith unit

i :

Unit index (i=1, 2, ⋯, G)

K i,t :

Start-up cost of the ith unit

MDT i :

Minimum down-time of the ith unit

MUT i :

Minimum up-time of the ith unit

P i,t :

Power output of the ith unit for hour t

P min i :

Minimum generation limit of the ith unit, MW

P max i :

Maximum generation limit of the ith unit, MW

r i,t :

Operation status of the ith unit for hour t (1 = “on”, 0 = “off”)

R i :

Power-purchasing expense of the ith unit

s i :

Emission efficiency factor which represents the percent of pollutants handled by environmental apparatus

\(S_{D_t }\) :

Reserved requirement during hour t, MW

t :

Hour index (t=1, 2, ⋯, T)

T :

UC horizon

T on i :

Duration during which the ith unit is continuously on

T off i :

Duration during which the ith unit is continuously off

u :

Coefficient of energy consumption which represents the cost for energy compensation when consuming unit resource (e.g. coal)

\(U_{R_i }\) :

Up ramp limit of the ith unit, MW/h

α i :

Emission factor, kg/MW

δ i :

Operation status of the ith environmental equipment (1 = “on”, 0 = “off”)

ρ :

Coefficient of handling pollutants

φ i :

Expense of environmental equipment handling pollutants

ω :

Environmental value of pollutants which represents the cost for handling pollutants of each unit

References

  1. Salam S. Unit commitment solution methods [J]. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2007, 1(11): 290–295.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ongsakul W, Petcharaks N. Unit commitment by enhanced adaptive Lagrangian relaxation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(1): 620–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chuang C S, Chang G W. Lagrangian relaxationbased unit commitment considering fast response reserve constraints [J]. Energy and Power Engineering, 2013, 5: 970–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuan X, Su A, Nie H, et al. Unit commitment problem using enhanced particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. Soft Computing, 2011, 15(1): 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Simopoulos D N, Kavatza S D, Vournas C D. Unit commitment by an enhanced simulated annealing algorithm [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(1): 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dudek G. Adaptive simulated annealing schedule to the unit commitment problem [J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2010, 80(4): 465–472.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Jalilzadeh S, Pirhayati Y. An improved genetic algorithm for unit commitment problem with lowest cost [J]. Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2009, 1: 571–575.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dudek G. Unit commitment by genetic algorithm with specialized search operators [J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2004, 72(3): 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Datta D. Unit commitment problem with ramp rate constraint using a binary real-coded genetic algorithm [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13(9): 3873–3883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Damousis I G, Bakirtzis A G, Dokopoulos P S. A solution to the unit commitment problem using integer-coded genetic algorithm [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(2): 1165–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Pan  (潘 谦).

Additional information

Foundation item: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61004088 and 61374160)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, Q., He, X., Cai, Yz. et al. Improved real-coded genetic algorithm solution for unit commitment problem considering energy saving and emission reduction demands. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 20, 218–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-015-1610-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-015-1610-2

Key words

CLC number

Navigation