Skip to main content

Conclusion and Contribution to Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cost-of-Capital in Managerial Finance

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 1477 Accesses

Abstract

In the final chapter of this thesis, the outcome and the contribution to knowledge from all stages of this research are outlined and summarised. In doing so, both the findings from the qualitative interviews and the findings from the quantitative company survey are taken into account in order to arrive at an overall conclusion that integrates the results from the different methods. Furthermore, in this chapter, the limitations of the research are pointed out. Moreover, the implications of this research for theory, practice and further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The content of Fig. 8.1 is not comprehensive in terms of the pieces of literature that are listed. It only gives examples of seminal pieces of literature that were discussed in the literature review.

  2. 2.

    Please note that the contribution of the literature review is not based on a previously identified research gap, as the gaps were derived from the literature review.

References

  • Al Mutairi M, Tian G, Tan A (2009) Corporate finance practice in Kuwait: a survey to confront theory with practice. In: 22nd Australasian finance and banking conference 2009 (available from SSRN)

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Mutairi M, Tian G, Hasan H, Tan A (2012) Corporate governance and corporate finance practices in a Kuwait stock exchange market listed firm: a survey to confront theory with practice. Corp Gov 12(5):595–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong CS, Core JE, Taylor DJ, Verrecchia RE (2011) When does information asymmetry affect the cost of capital? J Account Res 49(1):1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold G (2008) Corporate financial management. Financial Times Prentice Hall, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold G, Hatzopoulos PD (2000) The theory-practice gap in capital budgeting: evidence from the United Kingdom. J Bus Finance Account 27(5/6):603–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker HK, English P (2011) Capital budgeting valuation. Financial analysis for today’s investment projects. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker HK, Martin GS (2011) Capital structure and corporate financing decisions. Theory, evidence, and practice. Essential perspectives. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker HK, Dutta S, Saadi S (2011) Corporate finance practices in Canada: where do we stand? Multinatl Finance J 15(3/4):157–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball R, Brown P (1969) An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. J Account Res 6(2):300–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver W, Kettler P, Scholes M (1970) The association between market determined and accounting determined risk measures. Account Rev 10(2):654–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennouna K, Meredith GG, Marchant T (2010) Improved capital budgeting decision making: evidence from Canada. Manag Decis 48(2):225–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bildersee JS (1975) The association between a market-determined measure of risk and alternative measures of risk. Account Rev 50(1):81–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Black C, Parry J, Anderson H, Bennett JA (2002) Are New Zealand chief financial officers the ‘country cousins’ of their American counterparts? Univ Auckl Bus Rev 4(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Block S (2003) Divisional cost of capital: a study of its use by major U.S. firms. Eng Econ 48(4):345–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boquist JA, Moore WT (1983) Estimating the systematic risk of an industry segment: a mathematical programming approach. Financ Manag 12(4):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman RG (1979) The theoretical relationship between systematic risk and financial (accounting) variables. J Financ 34(3):617–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman RG, Bush SR (2006) Using comparable companies to estimate the betas of private companies. J Appl Financ 16(2):71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey RA, Myers SC, Allen F (2009) Principles of corporate finance. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham EF (1975) Hurdle rates for screening capital expenditure proposals. Financ Manag 4(3):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brounen D, de Jong A, Koedijk K (2004) Corporate finance in Europe: confronting theory with practice. Financ Manag 33(4):71–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunzell T, Liljeblom E, Vaihekoski M (2011) Determinants of capital budgeting methods and hurdle rates in Nordic firms. Account Financ 53(1):85–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bufka J, Kemper O, Schiereck D (2004) A note on estimating the divisional cost of capital for diversified companies: an empirical evaluation of heuristic-based approaches. Eur J Financ 10(1):68–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazi A, Terra PRS, Zanella FC (2010) Theory versus practice: perspectives of Middle Eastern financial managers. Eur Bus Rev 22(2):195–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua J, Chang PC, Wu Z (2006) The full-information approach for estimating divisional betas: implementation issues and tests. J Appl Financ 16(1):53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K (2007) Research methods in education. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Conine TE Jr (1982) On the theoretical relationship between business risk and systematic risk. J Bus Financ Account 9(2):199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conine TE Jr, Tamarkin M (1985) Divisional cost of capital estimation: adjusting for leverage. Financ Manag 14(1):54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins DJ, Phillips RD (2005) Estimating the cost of equity capital for property-liability insurers. J Risk Insur 72(3):441–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran A (2011) Applied corporate finance. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt MC, Bhagwat YN (1991) A full-information approach for estimating divisional betas. Financ Manag 20(2):60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns of stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 33(1):3–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RJ, Kerr HS (1981) Estimating the divisional cost of capital: an analysis of the pure-play technique. J Financ 36(5):997–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geginat J, Morath B, Wittmann R, Knüsel P (2006) Kapitalkosten als strategisches Entscheidungskriterium. Available at http://www.rolandberger.com/expertise/functional_issues/restructuring/2006-05-03-rbsc-pub-capital.html

  • Gordon MJ, Halpern PJ (1974) Cost of capital for a division of a firm. J Financ 29(4):1153–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham JR, Harvey CR (2001) The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J Financ Econ 60(2/3):187–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham JR, Harvey CR (2003) The theory and practice of corporate finance: the data. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=395221

  • Hamada RS (1972) The effect of the firm’s capital structure on the systematic risk of common stock. J Financ 27(2):435–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermes N, Smid P, Yao L (2007) Capital budgeting practices: a comparative study of the Netherlands and China. Int Bus Rev 16(5):630–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram M, Margetis S (2010) A practical method to estimate the cost of equity capital for a firm using cluster analysis. Manag Financ 36(2):160–167

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG International (2010) Cost of capital and impairment test study 2009. Empirical survey of companies in Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland and Spain. Available from: http://www.kpmg.de/WasWirTun/17368.htm

  • Lev B (1974) On the association between operating leverage and risk. J Financ Quant Anal 9(4):627–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner J (1965) The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev Econ Stat 47(1):13–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7(1):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaney E, Pointon J, Thomas M, Tucker J (2004) Practitioners’ perspectives on the UK cost of capital. Eur J Financ 10(2):123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty JJ, Yeh TD, Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH (2002) What’s your real cost of capital? Harv Bus Rev 80(10):114–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen C, Plenborg T, Schøler F (2006) Issues in valuation of privately held firms. J Priv Equity 10(1):33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll R, Ross S (1984) The arbitrage pricing theory approach to strategic portfolio planning. Financ Anal J 4(3):14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S (1976) The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. J Econ Theory 13(3):341–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PA, Ryan GP (2002) Capital budgeting practices of the fortune 1000: how have things changed? J Bus Manag 8(4):355–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Financ 19(3):425–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinle C, Krummaker S, Lehmann G (2007) Bestimmung von Kapitalkosten in diversifizierten Unternehmungen: Verfahrensvergleiche und Anwendungsempfehlungen. Z Controlling Manag 51(3):204–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DJ (1976) Sources of systematic risk in common stocks. J Bus 49(2):173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toms S, Salama A, Nguyen DT (2005) The association between accounting and market-based risk measures. University of York Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Truong G, Partington G, Peat M (2008) Cost-of-capital estimation and capital-budgeting practice in Australia. Aust J Manag 33(1):95–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schlegel, D. (2015). Conclusion and Contribution to Knowledge. In: Cost-of-Capital in Managerial Finance. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15135-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics