Skip to main content

Earth Stewardship, Socioecosystems, the Need for a Transdisciplinary Approach and the Role of the International Long Term Ecological Research Network (ILTER)

  • Chapter
Earth Stewardship

Part of the book series: Ecology and Ethics ((ECET,volume 2))

Abstract

The way we see ourselves and understand the world we live in guides and determines the types of solutions we are designing and implementing to deal with our global change problems. System thinking is helping us to recognize humanity as complex, self-organized, multi-level, and highly integrated socio-bio-physical entities that we refer to as socioecosystems. This new ontological paradigm requires new epistemological tools, and transdisciplinary research is inducing changes in different aspects of our scientific endeavor, including: the philosophical approach we use to observe our world; the level of commitment we put in our scientific work; the extent and scope we envision in our research goals; the geographical scale and context in which we focus our case-studies; the type of collaboration we engage in with other scientists; and the institutional arrangements we construct to accomplish our research efforts. The International Long Term Ecological Research Network (ILTER) includes national-level networks of scientists engaged and committed to conducting long-term and site-based ecological and socio-economic research and monitoring, with a strong interest in capacity building. ILTER members have expertise in the collection, management, and analysis of long-term environmental data and, together, they are responsible for creating and maintaining a large number of unique long-term datasets. ILTER has been a natural partner for global initiatives dealing with environmental issues, and many members of its community have been participating in these international programs. We should not underestimate the urgency, nor the level of commitment, required to foster worldwide socioecosystem research with a transdisciplinary approach, which are essential for the success of the sustainable Earth Stewardship initiative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1999) Ackoff’s best: his classic writings on management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn YY, Bagrow JP, Lehmann S (2010) Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature 466(7307):761–764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy L (1950) An outline of general system theory. Br J Philos Sci 1:134–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgos A, Páez R, Carmona E et al (2013) A systems approach to modeling community-based environmental monitoring: a case of participatory water quality monitoring in rural Mexico. Environ Monit Assess 185(12):10297–10316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (2007) Lamarck Redux: temporal scale as the key to the boundary between the human and natural worlds. In: Brown CS, Toadvine T (eds) Nature’s edge: boundary explorations in ecological theory and practice. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel Y, Kent R, Bar-Massada A et al (2013) Trends in ecological research during the last three decades – a systematic review. PLoS One 8(4):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Folke C, Norstrom A et al (2012) Program on ecosystem change and society: an international research strategy for integrated social–ecological systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Power ME, Pickett STA et al (2011) Earth stewardship: Science for action to sustain the human–Earth system. Ecosphere 2(8):Art. 89. doi:10.1890/ES11-00166.1

  • Collins SL, Swinton SM, Anderson CW et al (2007) Integrative science for society and environment: a strategic research initiative. National Science Foundation, p 35. http://www.lternet.edu/decadalplan/

  • Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The Anthropocene. Glob Chang Newsl 41:12–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Csermely P (2006) Weak links: the universal key to the stability of networks and complex systems. Science 126:2827. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31157-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich P et al (1997) Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues Ecol 2:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (2002) Human natures: genes, cultures and the human prospect. Penguin Books, Rutherford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (1991) Healing the planet: strategies for resolving the environmental crisis. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • García R (1994) Interdisciplinariedad y Sistemas Complejos. In: Leff E (ed) Ciencias Sociales y Formación Ambiental. Ed. Gedisa/UNAM, Barcelona, pp 45–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley FB (1993) A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology. Yale University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosz JR (1996) International long-term ecological research: priorities and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 11(10):444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gosz JR, Waide R, Magnuson J (2010) Twenty-eight years of the US-LTER program: experience, results, and research questions. In: Muller F, Schubert H, Klotz S (eds) Long term ecological research: between theory and application. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 54–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA et al (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50(7):571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Winiwarter V, Andersson K et al (2006) From LTER to LTSER: conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research. Ecol Soc 11(2):13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art13/

  • Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins BC (2010) The philosophy of Husserl. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal/Kingston, pp 90–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (1913) Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Halle

    Google Scholar 

  • ICSU (International Council for Science) (2010) Grand challenges in global sustainability research: a systems approach to research priorities for the decade. International Council for Science, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan CF (1998) Working with nature: resource management for sustainability. Taylor & Francis, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates R, Parris TM (2003) Long-term trends and a sustainability transition. PNAS 100(14):8062–8067

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya JJ, Regierb HA, Boylec M et al (1999) An ecosystem approach for sustainability: addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures 31:721–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maass JM (2012) El manejo sustentable de socio-ecosistemas. In: Calva JL (ed) Cambio climático y políticas de desarrollo sustentable, Tomo 14 de la colección Análisis Estratégico para el Desarrollo. Juan Pablos Editor-Consejo Nacional de Universitarios, México, pp 89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass JM, Equihua M (2014) La Red Internacional de Investigación Ecológica a Largo Plazo a 20 años de su creación: sus avances y retos. Bosque 35(3):415–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass JM, Martínez-Yrízar A (1990) Los ecosistemas: definición, origen e importancia del concepto. Ciencias Núm Especial 4:10–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis L (1998) Symbiotic planet: a new look at evolution. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard RB (2008) Finding hope in the millennium ecosystem assessment: an essay. Conserv Biol 22(4):862–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV (2001) Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? Ecology 82(12):3275–3284

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1953) Fundamentals of ecology. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parr T (2013) The international long-term ecological research network and its role in global research and policy. In: Tabarelli M, Duarte da Rocha CF, Romanowski HP et al (eds) PELD – CNPq: dez anos do Programa de Pesquisas Ecológicas de Longa Duração do Brasil : achados, lições e perspectivas. Ed. Universitária da UFPE, Recife, p 446

    Google Scholar 

  • Power ME, Chapin FS III (2009) Planetary stewardship. Front Ecol Environ 7(8):399–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman CL, Grove JM, Kuby LH (2004) Integrating social science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7(2):161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K et al (2010) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 46:472–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R (2010) Field environmental philosophy. Dialogue Universalism 20(11/12):85–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R (2012) Biocultural ethics: recovering the vital links between the inhabitants, their habits, and habitats. Environ Ethics 34(1):27–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Arango X, Massardo F et al (2008) Field environmental philosophy and biocultural conservation: The Omora Ethnobotanical Park Educational Program. Environ Ethics 30(3):325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Armesto JJ, Gutiérrez JR et al (2012) Integrating ecology and environmental ethics: earth stewardship in the southern end of the Americas. Bioscience 62:226–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen SH, Biggs R, Schlüter M et al (2014) Applying resilience thinking: seven principles for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Stockholm University, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski R (2012) Introducción a la Fenomenología. (trans: Marín Ávila E), 1st edition in Spanish. Círculo Latinoamericano de Fenomenología (Coord. Zirión A et al) Jitanjáfora Morelia Editoral, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg JH (2011) Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv 38(3):275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Sanderson A, Tyson PD et al (2004) Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank WT, Crossley DA Jr (eds) (1988) Forest hydrology and ecology at Coweeta. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM (1995) Peasantry, agroindustriality, sustainibility: the ecological and historical grounds of rural development. Interamerican Council on Sustainable Agriculture. Working Papers 3:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM (2001) Biodiversity and indigenous peoples. Encycl Biodivers 3:451–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan H, Waide RB, Maass JM et al (2007) Developing and delivering scientific information in response to emerging needs. Front Ecol Environ 5(4):W8–W11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM (1992) Global environmental change: an introduction. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ricardo Rozzi for his invitation to participate in this volume. Also, commentaries on the text by Antonio Zirión, Terry Chapin and Ricardo Rozzi, as well as the English revision by Roy May were very useful and highly appreciated. Lyliana Rentería, Raúl Ahedo and Atzimba López helped with the preparation of the manuscript. The document was prepared during a visit by Manuel Maass to the Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) with a DGAPA-UNAM sabbatical scholarship and within CONACYT support for ILTER.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Maass .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maass, M., Equihua, M. (2015). Earth Stewardship, Socioecosystems, the Need for a Transdisciplinary Approach and the Role of the International Long Term Ecological Research Network (ILTER). In: Rozzi, R., et al. Earth Stewardship. Ecology and Ethics, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12133-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics