Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating Social Science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network: Social Dimensions of Ecological Change and Ecological Dimensions of Social Change

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The integration of the social sciences into long-term ecological research is an urgent priority. To address this need, a group of social, earth, and life scientists associated with the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network have articulated a conceptual framework for understanding the human dimensions of ecological change for the LTER Network. This framework explicitly advocates that what is often divided into “natural” and human systems be considered a single, complex social-ecological system (SES). In this paper, we propose a list of core social science research areas, concepts, and questions; identify the need for multiscale investigatory frameworks crucial for implementing integrated research; and suggest practical approaches for integration. In sum, this paper is a general outline for empirical and cross-site research projects where investigators agree that bringing together social, biological, and earth scientists can lead to synthetic approaches and a unified understanding of the mechanisms regulating SES. Although the motivation for this goal is specific to the LTER Network and similar projects, we believe that the issues and ideas presented here are widely applicable to other interdisciplinary SES studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal C, Green GM, Grove JM, Evans TP, Schweik CM. 2001. A review and assessment of land-use change models: dynamics of space, time, and human choice. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-297. Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change, Indiana University, Bloomington (IN) and USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, South Burlington (VT).

  2. TFH Allen TW Hoekstra (1992) Toward a unified ecology: complexity in ecological systems. Columbia University Press New York 384

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bazzaz F, Ceballos G, Davis M, Dirzo R, Ehrlich PR, Eisner T, Levin S, and others. 1998. Ecological science and the human predicament. Science 282:879 (In Letters)

    Google Scholar 

  4. F Berkes C Folke (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. F Berkes C Folke (2002) Back to the future: ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. LH Gunderson CS Holling (Eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press Washington (DC) 121–46

    Google Scholar 

  6. WR Jr Burch DR DeLuca (1984) Measuring the social impact of natural resource policies. New Mexico University Press Albuquerque (NM) 216

    Google Scholar 

  7. JT Callahan (1984) ArticleTitleLong-term ecological research. BioScience 34 363–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. S Carpenter W Brock P Hanson (1999) ArticleTitleEcological and social dynamics in simple models of ecosystem management. Conserv Ecol 3(2) IssueID2 4

    Google Scholar 

  9. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, and others. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P Dasgupta C Levin J Lubchenco (2000) ArticleTitleEconomic pathways to ecological sustainability. BioScience 50 IssueID4 339–45

    Google Scholar 

  11. JM Diamond (1997) Guns, germs, and steel: the fates of human societies. Norton New York 480

    Google Scholar 

  12. OD Duncan (1961) ArticleTitleFrom social system to ecosystem. Socio Inq 31 140–9

    Google Scholar 

  13. OD Duncan (1964) Social organization and the ecosystem. REL Faris (Eds) Handbook of modern sociology. Rand McNally Chicago 37–82

    Google Scholar 

  14. DR Field WR Jr Burch (1988) Rural sociology and the environment. Greenwood Press New York 135

    Google Scholar 

  15. W Firey (1960) Man, mind and land; a theory of resource use. Free Press Glencoe (IL) 256

    Google Scholar 

  16. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B, Bengtsson J, and others. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations.A scientific background paper on resilience for the process of the World summit on the Environmental Advisory Council to the Swedish Government. 74 p.

  17. DR Foster F Swanson J Aber D Tilman N Brokaw I Burke A Knapp (2002) ArticleTitleThe importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience 53 IssueID1 1:77–88

    Google Scholar 

  18. J Franklin C Bledsoe JT Callahan (1990) ArticleTitleContributions of the LTER program. BioScience 40 7

    Google Scholar 

  19. NB Grimm JM Grove CL Redman STA Pickett (2000) ArticleTitleIntegrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience 70 571–84

    Google Scholar 

  20. JM Grove (1999) New tools for exploring theory and methods in human ecosystem and landscape analyses: computer modeling, remote sensing and geographic information systems. HK Cordell JC Bergstrom (Eds) Integrating social sciences and ecosystem management. Sagamore Champaign (IL) 219–36

    Google Scholar 

  21. JM Grove WR Jr Burch (1997) ArticleTitleA social ecology approach and applications of urban ecosystem and landscape analyses: a case study of Baltimore, Maryland. Urban Ecosyst 1 259–75 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018591931544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. JM Grove K Hinson R Northrop (2002) Education, social ecology, and urban ecosystems, with examples from Baltimore, Maryland. AR Berkowitz CH Nilon KS Hollweg (Eds) Understanding urban ecosystems: a new frontier for science and education. Springer-Verlag New York 67–86

    Google Scholar 

  23. LH Gunderson CS Holling (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature. Island Press Washington (DC) 450

    Google Scholar 

  24. CS Holling SR Carpenter WA Brock LH Gunderson (2002) Discoveries for sustainable futures. LH Gunderson CS Holling (Eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature. Island Press Washington (DC) 395–417

    Google Scholar 

  25. GD Jenerette J Wu (2001) ArticleTitleAnalysis and simulation of land-use change in central Arizona–Phoenix region, USA. Landscape Ecol 16 611–26 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013170528551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. AP Kinzig (2001) ArticleTitleBridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems 4 709–15 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10021-001-0039-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. CP Kottak (1999) ArticleTitleThe new ecological anthropology. Am Anthropol 101 IssueID1 23–35

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lambin EF A. Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, and others. 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environ Change 11(4):261–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. SA Levin (1999) Fragile dominion: complexity and the commons. Perseus Reading (MA) 250

    Google Scholar 

  30. GE Likens (1991) ArticleTitleHuman-accelerated environmental change. BioScience 41(3) 130

    Google Scholar 

  31. B Low R Costanza E Ostrom J Wilson CP Simon (1999) ArticleTitleHuman ecosystem interactions: a dynamic integrated model. Ecol Econ 31 IssueID20 227–42 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00081-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. GE Machlis JE Force WR Jr Burch (1997) ArticleTitleThe human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Soc Nat Resources 10 347–67

    Google Scholar 

  33. GP Marsh (1864) Man and nature. Reprinted in 1965. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge (MA) 472

    Google Scholar 

  34. MJ McDonnell STA Pickett (1993) Humans as components of ecosystems: the ecology of subtle effects and populated areas. Springer-Verlag New York 364

    Google Scholar 

  35. WK Michener TJ Baerwald P Firth MA Palmer JL Rosenberger EA Sandlin H Zimmerman (2001) ArticleTitleDefining and unraveling biocomplexity. BioScience 51 IssueID12 1018–23

    Google Scholar 

  36. [NRC] National Research Council. 1992. Global environmental change: understanding the human dimensions. In: Stern PC, Young OR, Druckerman D, editors. Washington (DC): National Academy Press. 308 p.

  37. [NRC] National Research Council. 1998. People and pixels: linking remote sensing and social science. In: Liverman D, Moran E, Rindfuss R, Stern P, editors. Washington (DC): National Academy Press. 244 p.

  38. [NRC] National Research Council. 1999. Our common journey: a transition towards sustainability. Policy Division, Board of Sustainable Development. Washington (DC): National Academy Press. 363 p.

  39. [NSF] National Science Foundation. 2002. Long-term ecological research twenty-year review. http://intranet.lternet.edu/archives/documents/reports/20_yr_review.

  40. E Ostrom (1999) ArticleTitleCoping with tragedies of the commons. Annu Rev Polit Sci 2 493–535 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. STA Pickett (1993) An ecological perspective on population change and land use. CL Jolly BB Torrey (Eds) Population and land use in developing countries: report of a workshop. National Academy Press Washington (DC) 37–41

    Google Scholar 

  42. STA Pickett WR Jr Burch SE Dalton TW Foresman JM Grove R Rowntree (1997) ArticleTitleA conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst 1 185–99 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018531712889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. STA Pickett WR Jr Burch JM Grove (1999) ArticleTitleInterdisciplinary research: maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 2 302–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. STA Pickett ML Cadenasso JM Grove CH Nilon RV Pouyat WC Zipperer R Costanza (2001) ArticleTitleUrban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecology, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Sys 32 127–57 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. CL Redman (1999a) ArticleTitleHuman dimensions of ecosystem studies. Ecosystems 2 296–8 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. CL Redman (1999b) Human impact on ancient environments. University of Arizona Press Tucson (AZ)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Redman CL, Kinzig A, Foster D, Gutmann M, Kareiva P. 2002. Agricultural landscapes in transition: a cross-scale approach. A proposal to the National Science Foundation’s Biocomplexity program. http://ces.asu.edu/agtrans.

  48. EWB Russell (1993) People and land through time: linking ecology and history. Yale University Press New Haven (CT) and London 306

    Google Scholar 

  49. MS Scheffer S Carpenter JA Foley C Folkes B Walker (2001) ArticleTitleCatastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413 591–6 Occurrence Handle10.1038/35098000 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXnsleht7c%3D Occurrence Handle11595939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. I Scoones (1999) ArticleTitleNew ecology and the social sciences: what prospects for a fruitful engagement? Annu Rev Anthropol 28 479–507 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. WL Jr Thomas (1956) Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Volume 1, with the collaboration of Sauer CQ, Bates M, Mumford L. University of Chicago Press Chicago 1193

    Google Scholar 

  52. BL II Turner WC Clark RW Kates JF Richards JT Mathews WB Meyer (1990) The earth as transformed by human action: global and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years. Cambridge (UK)Cambridge University Press 1990 713

    Google Scholar 

  53. SE van der Leeuw (1998) The ARCHAEOMEDES Project B: understanding the natural and anthropogenic causes of land degradation and desertification in the Mediterranean basin. Office of Publications of the European Union Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  54. SE van der Leeuw CL Redman (2002) ArticleTitlePlacing archaeology at the center of socio-natural studies. Am Antiq 67 IssueID4 597–605

    Google Scholar 

  55. AP Vayda (1969) Environment and cultural behavior; ecological studies in cultural anthropology. Natural History Press Garden City (NY) xi–xvi

    Google Scholar 

  56. PM Vitousek HA Mooney J Lubchenco JM Melillo (1997) ArticleTitleHuman domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277 494–9 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.277.5325.494 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXkvVektLs%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. RA Watson PJ Watson (1969) Man and nature: an anthropological essay in human ecology. Harcourt Brace & World New York

    Google Scholar 

  58. TJ Wilbanks RW Kates (1999) ArticleTitleGlobal change in local places: how scale matters. Clim Change 43 601–28 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005418924748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. J Wu S Levin (1994) ArticleTitleA spatial patch dynamic modeling approach to pattern and process in an annual grassland. Ecol Monogr 64 447–64

    Google Scholar 

  60. J Wu JL David (2002) ArticleTitleA spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol Model 153 7–26 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00499-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. J Wu O Loucks (1995) ArticleTitleFrom balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q R Biol 70 439–66 Occurrence Handle10.1086/419172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

In January 2000, LTER scientists and colleagues from other large interdisciplinary projects funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) gathered in Tempe, Arizona, to craft a networkwide approach to the integration of social science into long-term ecological research (supported by NSF Award 9714833 and the LTER Network office). Workshop participants and their affiliations included Charles L. Redman, Nancy Grimm, Ann Kinzig, Lauren H. Kuby, and Ed Hackett (Central Arizona–Phoenix LTER); J. Morgan Grove, Bill Burch, and Steward Pickett (Baltimore Ecosystem Study); Steve Carpenter and Peter Nowak (North Temperate Lakes LTER); F. Stuart Chapin (Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest); Ted Gragson (Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory); Craig Harris (Kellogg Biological Station); Bob Waide (LTER Network); Tom Baerwald (NSF/Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences); Anthony de Souza (National Research Council); Grant Heiken (Los Alamos National Laboratories); Peter Kareiva (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration); Emilio Moran and Elinor Ostrom (Indiana University); Sander van der Leeuw (Sorbonne); Tom Wilbanks (Oak Ridge National Laboratory); and Brent Yarnal (Penn State).

Contributors to this manuscript include Steve Carpenter, Ted Gragson, Edward Hackett, Craig Harris, Nancy Grimm, Peter Kareiva, Ann Kinzig, Elinor Ostrum, Pete Nowak, Steward Pickett, and Sander van der Leeuw. This article further benefited from the insightful comments of three anonymous reviewers.Contributors to this manuscript include Steve Carpenter, Ted Gragson, Edward Hackett, Craig Harris, Nancy Grimm, Peter Kareiva, Ann Kinzig, Elinor Ostrum, Pete Nowak, Steward Pickett, and Sander van der Leeuw. This article further benefited from the insightful comments of three anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles L. Redman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Redman, C., Grove, J. & Kuby, L. Integrating Social Science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network: Social Dimensions of Ecological Change and Ecological Dimensions of Social Change. Ecosystems 7, 161–171 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0215-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0215-z

Keywords

Navigation