Skip to main content

Statistics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Dermatology Trials 101
  • 1028 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical trials are a key component in the practice of evidence-based medicine. Much thought should be put into the design of a trial and only then should a protocol be developed to ensure that the targeted outcome is successfully achieved. The first duty when considering the methodology to be used in a clinical trial is to ensure the safety of the participants (patients and healthy volunteers). Ethical principles and practices should guide the physicians running the trial, which should be designed and conducted in such a way that the reliability of the data is of the highest possible standard. An experienced statistician should be consulted before the trial commences. Suitable endpoints, methods of comparison, and statistical analyses must be carefully selected to achieve the intended goals of the research. Although running a well-designed clinical trial may appear a relatively straightforward task, the underlying protocols can be flawed unless founded on meticulous methodology. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a brief guide to some factors that need to be considered when designing a clinical trial, with particular emphasis on dermatology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berndt E, Cockburn I. Price indexes for clinical trial research: a feasibility study. 2012. p. 1–27. PriceIndexesForClinicalTrialResearch: preview.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Umscheid C, Margolis DJ, Craig E, Grossman CE. Key concepts of clinical trials: a narrative review. Postgrad Med. 2011;123(5):194–204.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams HC, Dellavalle RP. The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:1008–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez U, Pinart M, Rengifo-Pardo M, Macaya A, Alvar J, et al. Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD004834.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez U, Pinart M, Reveiz L, Alvar J. Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(4):CD005067.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez U, Pinart M, Reveiz L, Rengifo-Pardo M, Tweed J, et al. Designing and reporting clinical trials on treatments for cutaneous leishmaniasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:409–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Risk of bias. http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_8/table_8_4_a_a_common_classification_scheme_for_bias.htm

  8. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. Br Med J. 2001;323:334–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart-Brown S, Anthony R, Wilson L, et al. Should randomised controlled trials be the “gold standard” for research on preventive interventions for children? J Child Serv. 2011;6(4):228–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nankervis H, Maplethorpe A, Williams HC. Mapping randomized controlled trials of treatments for eczema—the GREAT database (the Global Resource of EczemA Trials: a collection of key data on randomized controlled trials of treatments for eczema from 2000 to 2010). BMC Dermatol. 2011;11:10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoch HE, Busse KL, Dellavalle RP. The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:1008–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. BLISTER Study/The Bullous Pemphigoid Steroids and Tetracyclines Study 2013. http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=4611

  13. Craig FF, Thomas KS, Mitchell EJ, et al. UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network’s STOP GAP trial (a multicentre trial of prednisolone versus ciclosporin for pyoderma gangrenosum): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2012;13:51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nuremberg Code. Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1949. p. 181–2.

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Medical Organization Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J. 1996;313(7070):1448–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(3):141–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Services DoHaH, editor. Code of Federal Regulations—The Common Rule: Protection of Human Subjects. Vol. 45. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bagatin E, Miot HA. How to design and write a clinical research protocol in cosmetic dermatology. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88(1):69–75.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhardwaj SS, Camacho F, Derrow A, Fleischer Jr AB, Feldman SR. Statistical significance and clinical relevance: the importance of power in clinical trials in dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(12):1520–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheps S. Sample size and power. J Invest Surg. 1993;6:469–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lachin JM. Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1981;2(2):93–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Phillips WC, Scott JA, Blasczcynski G. The significance of “no significance”: what a negative statistical test really means. Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141(1):203–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kraemer HC. Sample size: when is enough enough? Am J Med Sci. 1988;296:360–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Javitt JC. When does the failure to find a difference mean that there is none? Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:1034–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tetzlaff JM, Marie J, Moher J, Chan A. Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey. Trials. 2012;13:176.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. FDA Clinical Trials Guidance Documents. http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm122046.htm

  27. Sampogna F, Spagnoli A, Di Pietro C, Pagliarello C, Paradisi A, Tabolli S, Abeni D. Field performance of the Skindex-17 quality of life questionnaire: a comparison with the Skindex-29 in a large sample of dermatological outpatients. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133:104–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Corey G, Wilcox M, Talbot G, Friedland H, Baculik T, Witherell G, Critchley I, Das A, Thye D. Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(6):641–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Patient involvement in clinical trials. The active involvement of patients and patient organisations in (the) clinical trial (development process). http://www.patientpartner-europe.eu/en/resources/active-involvement-in-the-process

  30. U.K Dermatology Clinical Trials Network’s PATCH Trial Team. Prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of cellulitis (erysipelas) of the leg: results of the U.K. Dermatology Clinical Trials Network’s PATCH II trial. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(1):169–78.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enzo Emanuele M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Emanuele, E. (2015). Statistics. In: Nasir, A. (eds) Clinical Dermatology Trials 101. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09027-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09027-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09026-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09027-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics