Skip to main content

Should a Retailer Support a Quality Improvements Strategy?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Dynamic Games

Part of the book series: Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games ((AISDG,volume 13))

Abstract

In a one-manufacturer-one-retailer supply chain, players establish both operations and marketing strategies and coordinate the chain through the implementation of a support program. A retailer, who sets both the pricing and the advertising strategies, acts as chain leader and decides whether to support a manufacturer’s operational strategy, such as quality improvements. The players share the overall chain revenues based on an exogenous, fixed sharing agreement. We compared coordinated and non-coordinated solutions in which coordination is carried out via a support program for quality improvements. While according to the literature a retailer–leader always has an economic preference for operation-based coordination, our findings reveal that: (a) low operational efficiency and effectiveness discourage the retailer’s interest in coordination and (b) good sharing parameter values overcome concerns regarding operational inefficiency but not those of operational ineffectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeder C, Preusser M, Hartl R (2009) Simulation and optimization of supply chains: alternative or complementary approaches? OR Spectr 31(1):95–119

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon G (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. In: Graves S, de Kok T (eds) Handbooks in operations research and management science: Supply chain management. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand S, Moskowitz H, Novak A, Rekhi I, Sorger G (1996) Capacity allocation for dynamic process improvement with quality and demand considerations. Oper Res 44(6):964–976

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chintagunta P, Jain D (1992) A dynamic model of channel member strategies for marketing expenditures. Mark Sci 11:168–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Giovanni P (2011a) Environmental collaboration in a closed loop supply chain with a reverse revenue sharing contract. Ann Oper Res Online First Articles:23 pages. doi:10.1007/s10479-011-0912-5

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giovanni P (2011b) Quality improvements vs. advertising support: Which strategy works better for a manufacturer? Eur J Oper Res 208(2):119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Giovanni P, Roselli M (2012) Overcoming the drawbacks of a revenue sharing contract through a support program. Ann Oper Res 196:201–222

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Giovanni P, Zaccour G (2013) Cost-revenue sharing contract in closed-loop supply chains. In: Cardaliaguet P, Cressman R (eds) Advances in dynamic games. Annals of the international society of dynamic games, vol 12. Birkhäuser, Boston, pp 395–421

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dockner E, Jørgensen S, Long N, Sorger G (2000) Differential games in economics and management science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Doganoglu T, Klapper D (2006) Goodwill and dynamic advertising strategies. Quant Market Econ 4:5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Ouardighi F, Kim B (2010) Supply quality management with wholesale price and revenue-sharing contracts under horizontal competition. Eur J Oper Res 206:329–340

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • El Ouardighi F, Jørgensen S, Pasin F (2008) A dynamic game of operations and marketing management in a supply chain. Int J Game Theory Rev 34:59–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson G (2011) A differential game model of the marketing-operations interface. Eur J Oper Res 211(2):394–402

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fine C (1986) Quality improvements and learning in productive systems. Manag Sci 10:1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine C (1988) A quality control model with learning effects. Oper Res 36:437–444

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Prasad A, Sethi S, Gutierrez G (2007) A survey of Stackelberg differential game models in supply and marketing channels. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 16:385–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Prasad A, Sethi S (2009) Coordinated advertising and pricing in a dynamic stochastic supply chain: Feedback Stackelberg strategies. Prod Oper Manag 18:78–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen S (1986) Optimal production, purchasing and pricing: A differential game approach. Eur J Oper Res 24:64–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen S, Zaccour G (2003) A differential game of retailer promotions. Automatica 39: 1145–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen S, Sigué S, Zaccour G (2000) Dynamic coordinated advertising in a channel. J Retailing 76:71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen S, Sigué S, Zaccour G (2001) Stackelberg leadership in a marketing channel. Int Game Theory Rev 3:13–26

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen S, Taboubi S, Zaccour G (2003) Retail promotions with negative brand image effects: Is cooperation possible? Eur J Oper Res 150:395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen S, Taboubi S, Zaccour G (2006) Incentives for retailer promotion in a marketing channel. In: Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, vol 8. Birkhäuser, Boston, pp 365–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Karray S, Zaccour G (2006) Could co-op advertising be a manufacturer’s counterstrategy to store brands? J Bus Res 59:1008–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim B (1998) Optimal development of production technology when autonomous and induced learning are present. Int J Prod Econ 55:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim B (2003) Dynamic outsourcing to contract manufacturers with different capabilities of reducing the supply cost. Int J Prod Econ 86:63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Lanzenauer C, Pilz-Glombik K (2002) Coordinating supply chain decisions: An optimization model. OR Spectr 24(1):59–78

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Herrán G, Taboubi S, Zaccour G (2012) Dual role of price and myopia in a marketing channel. Eur J Oper Res 219:284–295

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer J, de Witt W, Keebler J, Min S, Nix N, Smith C, Zacham Z (2001) Defining supply chain management. J Bus Logist 22(2):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair A, Narasimhan N (2006) Dynamics of competing with quality- and advertising-based goodwill. Eur J Oper Res 175:462–474

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao A, Qul L, Ruekert R (1999) Signalling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. J Mark Res 36:258–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roselli M, De Giovanni P (2012) Recent developments in the differential equations of design and conformance quality. Int J Decis Sci Risk Manag 4(1–2):163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapiero C (1987) Production learning and quality control. IIE Trans 19(4):362–370

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vörös J (2006) The dynamics of price, quality and productivity improvement decisions. Eur J Oper Res 170:809–823

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro De Giovanni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Giovanni, P. (2013). Should a Retailer Support a Quality Improvements Strategy?. In: Křivan, V., Zaccour, G. (eds) Advances in Dynamic Games. Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, vol 13. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02690-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics