Skip to main content
Log in

A survey of Stackelberg differential game models in supply and marketing channels

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 21 June 2008

Abstract

Stackelberg differential game models have been used to study sequential decision making in noncooperative games in diverse fields. In this paper, we survey recent applications of Stackelberg differential game models to the supply chain management and marketing channels literatures. A common feature of these applications is the specification of the game structure: a decentralized channel composed of a manufacturer and independent retailers, and a sequential decision procedure with demand and supply dynamics and coordination issues. In supply chain management, Stackelberg differential games have been used to investigate inventory issues, wholesale and retail pricing strategies, and outsourcing in dynamic environments. The underlying demand typically has growth dynamics or seasonal variation. In marketing, Stackelberg differential games have been used to model cooperative advertising programs, store brand and national brand advertising strategies, shelf space allocation, and pricing and advertising decisions. The demand dynamics are usually extensions of the classical advertising capital models or sales-advertising response models. We begin by explaining the Stackelberg differential game solution methodology and then provide a description of the models and results reported in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagchi, A. (1984). Stackelberg Differential Games in Economic Models. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Basar, T. & Olsder, G.J. (1999). Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory, 2nd ed. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bass, F.M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15 (5): 215–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bensoussan, E.E., Hurst, Jr. & Naslund, B. (1974). Management Application of Modern Control Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergen, M. & John, G. (1997). Understanding cooperative advertising participation rates in conventional channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (3):357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger, P.D. (1972). Vertical cooperative advertising ventures. Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (3): 309–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Breton, M., Jarrar, R. & Zaccour, G. (2006). A note on feedback Stackelberg equilibria in a Lanchester model with empirical application. Management Science, 52 (5): 804–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chintagunta, P. & Jain, D. (1992). A dynamic model of channel member strategies for marketing expenditures. Marketing Science, 11 (2): 168–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deal, K.R. (1979). Optimizing advertising expenditures in a dynamic duopoly. Operations Research, 27 (4): 682–692

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Deal, K.R., Sethi, S.P. & Thompson, G.L. (1979). A bilinear-quadratic differential game in advertising. In: P.-T. Liu and J. G. Sutinen (eds.), Control Theory in Mathematical Economics, 91–109. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  11. Derzko, N.A., Sethi, S.P. & Thompson, G.L. (1984). Necessary and sufficient conditions for optimal control of quasilinear partial differential systems. Journal of Optimal Theory and Application, 43: 89–101

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Desai, V.S. (1992). Marketing-production decisions under independent and integrated channel structure. Annals of Operations Research, 34: 275–306

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Desai, V.S. (1996). Interactions between members of a marketing-production channel under seasonal demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 90: 115–141

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Dockner, E., Jørgensen, S., Long, N.V. & Sorger, G. (2000). Differential Games in Economics and Management Science. Cambridge University Press

  15. Eliashberg, J. & Steinberg, R. (1987). Marketing-production decisions in an industrial channel of distribution. Management Science, 33 (8): 981–1000

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Erickson, G.M. (1992). Empirical analysis of closed-loop duopoly advertising strategies. Management Science, 38: 1732–1749

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Erichson, G.M. (1995). Differential game models of advertising competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 83 (3):431–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Erickson, G.M. (1997). Dynamic conjectural variations in a Lanchester oligopoly. Management Science, 43 (11):1603–1608

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Feichtinger, G., Hartel, R.F. & Sethi, S.P. (1994). Dynamic optimal control models in advertising: recent developments. Management Science, 40: 29–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fruchter, G.E. & Kalish, S. (1997). Closed-loop advertising strategies in a duopoly. Management Science, 43: 54–63

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Fruchter, G.E. & Kalish, S. (1998). Dynamic promotional budgeting and media allocation. European Journal of Operational Research, 111: 15–27

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Gutierrez, G.J. & He, X. (2007). Life-cycle channel coordination issues in launching an innovative durable product. Production and Operations Management, to appear

  23. Harris, C. & Vickers, J. (1995). Innovation and natural resources: a dynamic game with uncertainty. RAND Journal of Economics, 26 (3): 418–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. He, X. & Sethi, S.P. (2008). Dynamic slotting and pricing decisions in a durable product supply chain. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 134 (8), to appear

  25. He, X., Prasad, A. & Sethi, S.P. (2007). Cooperative advertising and pricing in a stochastic supply chain: feedback Stackelberg strategies. Working paper. The University of Texas at Dallas

  26. Huang, Z., Li, S.X. & Mahajan, V. (2002). An analysis of manufacturer-retailer supply chain coordination in cooperative advertising. Decision Sciences, 33 (3): 469–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Isaacs, R. (1965). Differential Games. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Jarrar, R., Martin-Herran, G. & Zaccour, G. (2004). Markov perfect equilibrium advertising strategies of Lanchester duopoly model: a technical note. Management Science, 50 (7): 995–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jørgensen, S. (1982). A survey of some differential games in advertising. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jørgensen, S., Sigue, S.P. & Zaccour, G. (2000). Dynamic cooperative advertising in a channel. Journal of Retailing, 76 (1): 71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jørgensen, S., Sigue, S.P. & Zaccour, G. (2001). Stackelberg leadership in a marketing channel. International Game Theory Review, 3 (1): 13–26

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Jørgensen, S., Taboubi, S. & Zaccour, G. (2001). Cooperative advertising in a marketing channel. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 110 (1): 145–158

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Jørgensen, S., Taboubi, S. & Zaccour, G. (2003). Retail promotions with negative brand image effects: is cooperation possible? European Journal of Operational Research, 150: 395–405

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Jørgensen, S., Taboubi, S. & Zaccour, G. (2006). Incentives for retailer promotion in a marketing channel. Annals of the International Society of dynamic Games, 8:365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jorsengen, S. & Zaccour, G. (2005). Differential Games in Marketing. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  36. Karray, S. & Zaccour, G. (2005). A differential game of advertising for national and store brands. In: A. Haurie, G. Zaccour (eds.), Dynamic Games: Theory and Applicatoins. 213–230, Springer, New York, NY

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Kogan, K. & Tapiero, C.S. (2007a, b, c, d, e). Supply Chain Games: Operations Management and Risk Valuation. Springer, New York, NY

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Kogan, K. & Tapiero, C.S. (2007f). Co-investment in supply chain infrastructure. Working Paper. Bar Ilan University, Israel

    Google Scholar 

  39. Little, J.D.C. (1979). Aggregate advertising models: the state of the art. Operations Research, 27 (4): 629–667

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Martin-Herran, G. & Taboubi, S. (2005). Incentive strategies for shelf-space allocation in duopolies. In: A. Haurie, G. Zaccour (eds.), Dynamic Games Theory and Applicatoins, 231–253. Springer, New York, NY

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Nerlove, M. & Arrow, K.J. (1962). Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica, 39: 129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pekelman, D. (1974). Simultaneous price production in channels. Marketing Science, 7:335–355

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rubio, S.J. (2006). On coincidence of feedback Nash equilibria and Stackelberg equilibria in economic applications of differential games. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 128 (1): 203–221

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Sethi, S.P. (1983). Deterministic and stochastic optimization of a dynamic advertising model. Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 4: 179–184

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Sethi, S.P. & Thompson, G.L. (2000). Optimal Control Theory: Applications to Management Science and Economics, 2nd ed. Springer, New York, NY

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Stackelberg, H.V. (1952). The Theory of the Market Economy, translated by Peacock A.T. William Hodge and Co., London

  47. Teng, J.T. & Thompson, G.L. (1983). Oligopoly models for optimal advertising when production costs obey a learning curve. Management Science, 29 (9): 1087–1101

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Thompson, G.L. & Teng, J.T. (1984). Optimal pricing and advertising policies for new product. Marketing Science, 3 (2): 148–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Urban, T.L. (1998). An inventory-theoretic approach to product assortment and shelf-space allocation. Journal of Retailing, 74 (1): 15–35

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Vidale, M.L. & Wolfe, H.B. (1957). An operations research study of sales response to advertising. Operations Research, 5: 370–381

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh P. Sethi.

Additional information

Ashutosh Prasad is an Associate Professor of Marketing at UT Dallas. He holds a PhD in Marketing and MS in Economics from UT Austin, MBA from IIM Calcutta and B.Tech in Electrical Engineering from ITBHU Varanasi. His dissertation essay, “Advertising vs. Pay-Per-View in Electronic Media,” won the 2003 IJRM Best Paper award. His research interests are in pricing and advertising strategies, the economics of information, and software marketing. He also actively researches salesforce management issues such as compensation design, internal marketing, training and motivation. His work has appeared, or is forthcoming, in journals such as Marketing Science, Management Science, Journal of Business, IJRM and Experimental Economics. Professor Prasad has taught Marketing Management, Pricing, Marketing Research and Marketing Models to MBA students, and Pricing and special topics seminars to PhD students. He received the 2002 Outstanding Undergraduate Teacher award. He has served as a reviewer for all the leading marketing journals.

Suresh P. Sethi is Charles & Nancy Davidson Distinguished Professor of Operations Management and Director of the Center for Intelligent Supply Networks in the School of Management at The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX. He earned his Ph.D. in Operations Research from Carnegie Mellon University in 1972. He has written 5 books and published more than 300 research papers in the fields of manufacturing and operations management, finance and economics, marketing, and optimization theory. He serves on the editorial board of such journals as Journal on Decision and Risk Analysis and Automatica. He is a Departmental Editor of Production and Operations Management. Recent honors include: POMS Fellow (2005), INFORMS Fellow (2003), AAAS Fellow (2003), IEEE Fellow (2001). Two conferences were organized and two books edited in his honor in 2005-6. He is a member of AAAS, CORS, DSI, INFORMS, IIE, ORSI, POMS, SIAM, and IEEE.

Genaro J. Gutierrez is an Associate Professor of Management at the McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, where he teaches operations management and management of projects. He is the Director of the McCombs School of Business Executive MBA Program in Mexico City, and he has served as advisor to the Economic Deregulation Unit of the Mexican Commerce and Industry Secretariat in 1995–96.

His current research interests include the incorporation of commodity exchanges in supply chain procurement, and the study of distribution channels. Recent publications of Dr. Gutierrez have appeared in Management Science, Operations Research, IIE Transactions, and The European Journal of Operations Research.

Professor Gutierrez earned his M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial Engineering from Stanford University. He also received the degree of Ingeniero Industrial y de Systemas from ITESM in Monterrey, Mexico.

An erratum to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11518-008-5082-x.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, X., Prasad, A., Sethi, S.P. et al. A survey of Stackelberg differential game models in supply and marketing channels. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 16, 385–413 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-007-5058-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-007-5058-2

Keywords

Navigation