Abstract
In this paper I argue that the definiteness marking function of the possessive suffix of some Uralic languages is not the outcome of a grammaticalization pathway but has always been inherent to them. The possessive suffix has thus two main functions: establishing a relation between entities or a relation between an entity and the discourse and indicating the definiteness of the referent of the marked noun. The interpretation of the suffix as a marker of definiteness or a marker of possession depends on the conceptual noun type of the marked noun and on the context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Komi and Udmurt examples are taken from Edygarova (2009).
- 2.
The only Uralic language with a free definite article is Hungarian (a ház, def house, ‘the house’), whereas Mordvin exhibits a morphological bound definite article. In both languages the definite article is derived from a demonstrative (Bechert 1993).
- 3.
Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/negation/
- 4.
- 5.
As proposed in Gerland and Horn (2010) the term definiteness is used to refer to the grammatical marking of uniqueness, whereas the term uniqueness represents the unique status of the referent. Thus, I will follow this distinction between the grammatical side and the semantic function. See also Ortmann (this volume).
- 6.
In this case, the Russian word for “to curse” is used. I would like to thank an anonymous reviewer who pointed out this case of code-switching to me.
- 7.
See Vikner and Jensen (2002) for possible interpretations of possessive constructions. They distinguish between lexical and contextual interpretations of the English genitive of which the emotional interpretation is one.
- 8.
Only occurrences of nouns were counted, occurrences e.g. of demonstrative pronouns were left out.
- 9.
Note that this example also provides a use of the suffix which is not yet explained, namely the co-occurrence with a numeral (or indefinite article).
Abbreviations
- abl :
-
Ablative
- acc :
-
Accusative
- all :
-
Allative
- dat :
-
Dative
- dem :
-
Demonstrative
- demin :
-
Deminutivum/Diminutive
- emph :
-
Emphasis
- ep :
-
Epenthetic vowel
- exl :
-
Exclamative
- gen :
-
Genitive
- imp :
-
Imperative
- ine :
-
Inessive
- inf :
-
Infinitive
- ins :
-
Instrumental
- lat :
-
Lative
- loc :
-
Locative
- narr :
-
Narrative
- neg :
-
Negation
- obj :
-
Objective conjugation
- part :
-
Participle
- pf :
-
Perfect
- ptpass :
-
Participium passivum
- prosec :
-
Prosecutive
- prs/pst :
-
Present
- prt :
-
Preterite
- sub :
-
Subjective conjugation
References
Abbott, Barbara. 2006. Definiteness and indefiniteness. In The handbook of pragmatics, eds. Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward, 122–149. Oxford: Blackwell.
Abondolo, Daniel. 1998. Khanty. In The Uralic languages, eds. Daniel Abondolo, 358–386. New York: Routledge.
Alhoniemi, Alho. 1993. Grammatik des Tscheremissischen (Mari). Hamburg: Buske.
Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Asudeh, Ash. 2005. Relational nouns, pronouns, and resumption. Linguistics and Philosophy 28(4): 375–446.
Barker, Chris. 1995. Possessive descriptions. Standford: CSLI Publications.
Barker, Chris. 2000. Definite possessives and discourse novelty. Theoretical Linguistics 26: 211–227.
Barker, Chris. 2004. Possessive weak definites. In Possessives and Beyond: Semantics and Syntax, eds. Ji-yung Kim, Yury Lander, and Barbara H Partee, 89–113. Amherst: GLSA Publications.
Bechert, Johannes. 1993. Definiteness and article systems. Eurotyp working papers.
Bisang, Walter. forthcoming. Grammaticalization and the areal factor –the perspective of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Proceedings of new reflections on grammaticalization 3, eds. Lopez-Couso, Maria Jose and Elena Seoane. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://www.linguistik.uni-mainz.de/bisang/publications/.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carlier, Anne, and Walter De Mulder. 2010. Definite articles. [...] eds. Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Christophersen, Paul. 1939. The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Collinder, Björn. 1955. Comparative grammar of the Uralic languages. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
Coppock, Elizabeth, and Stephen Wechsler. 2012. The objective conjugation in Hungarian: Agreement without phi-features. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 699–740.
Csúcs, Sándor. 1998. Udmurt. In The Uralic languages, eds. Daniel Abondolo, 276–304. New York: Routledge.
Dalrymple, Mary, and Irina Nikolaeva. 2011. Objects and information structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Décsy, Gyula. 1990. The Uralic protolanguage: A comprehensive reconstruction. Bloomington: Eurolingua.
Demske, Ulrike. 2004. Merkmale und Relationen. Diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase des Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Edygarova, Svetlana. 2009. Attributive possession in Udmurt language. Linguistica Uralica XLV 2: 101–118.
Ewing, Michael. 1995. Two Pathways of Identifiability in Cirebon Javanese. Berkeley Linguistics Society 21: Special Session on Discourse in Southeast Asian Languages: 72–82.
Fraurud, Kari. 2001. Possessives with extensive use. A source of definite articles? In Dimensions of possession, eds. Irène Baron, Michael Herslund, and Finn Sørensen, 243–267. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Gerland, Doris, and Christian Horn. 2010. Referential properties of nouns across languages. In Universal Grammar and Individual Languages. Proceedings of SICoL 2010, eds. D.-H. Choi, J.-S. Hong, H.-K. Kang, Y.-S. Kang, K.-H. Kim, K.-A. Kim, J.-Y. Yoon, S.-H. Rhee, and J.-S. Wu. Seoul: Korea University.
Gerland, Doris, and Ortmann, Albert. 2013. What counts as relational in Hungarian? Talk held at the International Conference on the Structure of Hungarian. August 30, Piliscsaba, Hungary.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Universals of human language, vol. 4, eds. Joseph Greenberg et al., 47–82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1991. The last stages of grammatical elements: Contractive and expansive desemanticization. In Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1, eds. Elisabeth Traugott and Bernd Heine, 300–314. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hausenberg, Anu-Reet. 1998. Komi. In The Uralic languages, eds. Daniel Abondolo, 305–326. New York: Routledge.
Havas, Ferenc. 2008. Unmarked object in the Uralic languages. A diachronic typological approach. Linguistica Uralica XLIV 1: 1–33.
Hawkins, John. 1978. Definiteness and indefiniteness. London: Croom Helm.
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases, Dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession. Cognitive source, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Helimski, Eugen. 1998a. Nganasan. In The Uralic languages, eds. Daniel Abondolo, 480–515. New York: Routledge.
Helimski, Eugen. 1998b. Selkup. In The Uralic languages, eds. Abondolo Daniel, 548–579. New York: Routledge.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2001. Articles. In Language typology and language universals, eds. Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible, 831–841. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2005. Gram, construction, and class formation. In Wortarten und Grammatikalisierung: Perspektiven in System und Erwerb, eds. Knobloch Clemens and Schaeder Burkhard, 79–93. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, Christian. 2010. Types of nouns and levels of types. Talk held at the 24th Scandinavian conference of linguistics, August 26, Joensuu, Finland.
Horn, Christian, and Nicolas Kimm. 2014, this volume. Nominal concept types in German fictional texts.
Kangasmaa-Minn, Eeva. 1998. Mari. In The Uralic languages, eds. Daniel Abondolo, 219–248. New York: Routledge.
Keresztes, László. 1998. Mansi. In The Uralic languages, eds. Daniel Abondolo, 387–427. New York: Routledge.
Klumpp, Gerson. 2009. Variation in Komi object marking. In Describing and modeling variation in grammar, Trends in linguistics, studies and monographs, vol. 204, eds. Andreas Dufter, Jürg Fleischer, and Guido Seiler, 325–359. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Körtvély, Erika. 2005. Verb conjugation in Tundra Nenets, Ph.D. thesis. SzTE Finnugor Tanszek, Szeged.
Künnap, Ago. 2006. Historically problematic morphosyntactic features in Uralic languages, Lincom studies in Uralic linguistics. Munich: Lincom.
Künnap, Ago. 2009. Use of the nominative of samoyedic substantives as instances of object and attribute. Linguistica Uralica 2009(2): 199–126.
Künnap, Ago. 2004. About the non-personal definite function of the Uralic 3rd person possessive suffix. Linguistica Uralica XL: 1–4.
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.
Löbner, Sebastian. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics 4: 279–326.
Löbner, Sebastian. 1998. Definite associative anaphora. In Approaches to discourse anaphora. In Proceedings of DAARC96 –discourse anaphora and resolution colloquium, eds. Simon Botley. Lancaster University July 17th–18th.
Löbner, Sebastian. 2011. Concept types and determination. Journal of Semantics 28: 279–333.
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mus, Nikolett. 2009. The question-words in Tundra Nenets. The nominal question words. Ural-Altaische Forschungen 1: 43–49.
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2003. Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic. In International symposium on deictic systems and quantification in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia. Collection of papers, eds. P. Suihkonen, and B. Comrie, 130–145. Izhevsk/Leipzig: Udmurt State University; Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology.
Ortmann, Albert. this volume. Definite article asymmetries and concept types: Semantic and pragmatic uniqueness.
Oubouzar, Erika. 1992. Zur Ausbildung des bestimmten Artikels im Althochdeutschen. In Althochdeutsch. Syntax und Semantik, Série germanique ancien, vol. 1, eds. Desportes Yvonne. Lyon: Université Lyon.
Pakendorf, Brigitte. 2007. Contact in the prehistory of the Sakha (Yakuts) linguistic and genetic perspectives. Netherlands: LOT.
Partee, Barbara. 1983/1997. Genitives – A case study. Appendix to Theo Janssen. 1997. Compositionality. In Handbook of logic and language, eds. Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, 464–470. Amsterdam/Cambridge, MA: Elsevier/The MIT Press.
Rédei, Károly. 1978. Chrestomathia syrjaenica. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493.
Schlachter, Wolfgang. 1960. Studien zum Possessivsuffix des Syrjänischen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Schroeder, Christoph. 2006. Articles and article systems in some areas of Europe. In Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe, eds. Bernini Guiliano and Schwartz Marcia, 545–615. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
Seiler, Hansjacob. 1983. Possession as an operational dimension of language, Language universals series, vol. 2. Tübingen: Narr.
Siegl, Florian. 2008. A note on personal pronouns in Enets and Northern Samoyedic. Linguistica Uralica 44(2): 119–130.
Strawson, P.F. 1950. On referring. Mind 59: 320–344.
Tereščenko, Natal’ja. 1979. Nganasanskij jazyk. Leningrad: Nauka.
Vikner, Carl, and Per A. Jensen. 2002. A semantic analysis of the English genitive. Interaction of lexical and formal semantics. Studia Linguistica 56: 191–226.
Wagner-Nagy, Beata. 2002. Chrestomathia nganasanica, Studia uralo-altaica Supplementum, vol. 10. Szeged/Budapest: SZTE Finnugor Tanszék.
Winkler, Eberhard. 2001. Udmurt. München: Lincom Europa.
Zaicz, Gábor. 1998. Mordva. In The Uralic languages, eds. Daniel Abondolo, 184–219. New York: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
The research for this article was supported by the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) grant Research Unit FOR 600 “Functional Concepts and Frames”. I would like to thank Christian Horn, Sebastian Löbner, Albert Ortmann and Melani Wratil for discussion, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gerland, D. (2014). Definitely Not Possessed? Possessive Suffixes with Definiteness Marking Function. In: Gamerschlag, T., Gerland, D., Osswald, R., Petersen, W. (eds) Frames and Concept Types. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 94. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01541-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01541-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01540-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01541-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)