Abstract
The invention of telescopes and microscopes about 400 years ago revolutionized our perception of the world, extending our sense of seeing. Extending it further and further has since been the driving force for major scientific developments. Local probe techniques extend our sense of touching into the micro- and nanoworld and in this way provide complementary new insight into these worlds we see with microscopic techniques. Furthermore, touching things is an essential prerequisite to manipulating things, and the ability to feel and manipulate single molecules and atoms for sure marks another of these revolutionizing steps in our relation to the world in which we live.
Local probes are small-sized objects, such as the very end of sharp tips, which interact with a sample, or better, the surface of a sample at selected positions. Proximity to or contact with the sample is required to have a high spatial resolution. This, in principle, is an old idea that appeared in the literature from time to time in context with bringing a source of electromagnetic radiation in close contact with a sample (Synge, Philos Mag 6:356, 1928; O’Keefe, J Opt Soc 46:359, 1956; Ash and Nicolls, Nature 237:510, 1972). It found no resonance and therefore was not pursued until the early 1980s. Nanoscale local probes require atomically stable tips and high-precision manipulation devices. The latter are based on mechanical deformations of spring-like structures by piezoelectric, electrostatic, or magnetic forces to ensure continuous and reproducible displacements with precision down to the picometer level. They also require very good vibration isolation. The resolution that can be achieved with local probes is given mainly by the effective probe size, its distance from the sample, and the distance dependence of the interaction between the probes and the sample measured. The last can be considered creating an effective aperture by selecting a small feature of the overall geometry of the probe tip, which then corresponds to the effective probe. One of the great advantages of local probes is that they can work in any environment; this way, they provide the possibility to study live biological processes similar to optical microscopy, but at a resolution similar to electron microscopy (EM).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Synge EH. A suggested method for extending microscopic resolution into the ultra-microscopic region. Philos Mag. 1928;6:356.
O’Keefe JA. Resolving power of visible light. J Opt Soc. 1956;46:359.
Ash EA, Nicolls G. Super-resolution aperture scanning microscope. Nature. 1972;237:510.
Binnig G, Rohrer H, Gerber C, Weibel E. Tunneling through a controllable vaccuum gap. Appl Phys Lett. 1982;40:178.
Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C. Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett. 1986;56:930.
Atomic force microscope and method for imaging surfaces with atomic resolution, issued to Gerd K. Binnig of IBM’s Zurich Research Laboratory in 1988, U.S. Patent 4724318.
Giessibl FJ, Hembacher S, Bielefeldt H, Mannhardt J. Subatomic features on the silicon(111)-(7×7) surface observed by atomic force microscopy. Science. 2000;289(5478):422.
Meyer E, Amer NM. Novel optical approach to atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett. 1988;53:2400.
Florin E-L, Moy VT, Gaub HE. Adhesion forces between individual ligand-receptor pairs. Science. 1994;264:415.
Haynes CA, Norde W. Globular proteins at solid-liquid interfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 1994;2:517–66.
Eckert R, Jeney S, Hörber JKH. Understanding intercellular interactions and cell adhesion: lessons from studies on protein-metal interactions. Cell Biol Int. 1998;21:707.
Rief M, Gautel M, Oesterhelt F, Fernandez JM, Gaub HE. Reversible Unfolding of Individual Titin Immunoglobulin Domains by AFM. Science. 1997;276:1109.
Kellermayer MSZ, Smith SB, Granzier HL, Bustamante C. Folding-unfolding transitions in single titin molecules characterized with force-measuring laser tweezers. Science. 1997;276:1112.
Tskhovrebova L, Trinick J, Sleep JA, Simmons RM. Elasticity and unfolding of single molecules of the giant muscle protein titin. Nature. 1997;387:308.
Altmann SM, Grunberg RG, Lenne PF, Ylanne J, Raae A, Herbert K, Saraste M, Nilges M, Hörber JKH. Pathways and intermediates in forced unfolding of spectrin repeats. Structure. 2002;10:1085–96.
Häberle W, Hörber JKH, Binnig G. Force microscopy on living cells. J Vac Sci Technol. 1991;B9:1210.
Cross SE, Yu-Sheng Jin, Jianyu Rao, Gimzewski JK. Nanomechanics of human metastatic cancer cells in clinical pleural effusions. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:780–3.
Hörber JKH, Häberle W, Ohnesorge F, Binnig G, Liebich HG, Czerny CP, Mahnel H, Mayr A. Investigation of living cells in the nanometer regime with the scanning force microscope. Scanning Microsc. 1992;6:919.
Stokes GV. High-voltage electron microscope study of the release of vaccinia virus from whole cells. J Virol. 1976;18:636.
Hörber JKH, Mosbacher J, Häberle W, Ruppersberg P, Sakmann B. A look at membrane patches with a scanning force microscope. Biophys J. 1995;68:1687.
Mosbacher J, Langer M, Hörber JKH, Sachs F. Voltage-dependent membrane displacements measured by atomic force microscopy. J Gen Physiol. 1998;111:65–74.
Corey DP, Hudspeth AJ. Analysis of the microphonic potential of the bullfrog’s sacculus. J Neurosci. 1983;3:962.
Furness DN, Hackney CM, Benos DJ. The binding site on cochlear stereocilia for antisera raised against renal Na channels is blocked by amiloride and dihydrostreptomycin. Hear Res. 1996;93:136.
Langer MG, Öffner W, Wittmann H, Flösser H, Schaar H, Häberle W, Pralle A, Ruppersberg JP, Hörber JKH. A scanning force microscope for simultaneous force and patch-clamp measurements on living cell tissues. Rev Sci Instrum. 1997;68:2583.
Adler HJ, Poje CP, Saunders JC. Recovery of auditory function and structure in the chick after two intense pure tone exposures. Hear Res. 1993;71:214.
Langer MG, Koitschev A, Haase H, Rexhausen U, Hörber JKH, Ruppersberg JP. Mechanical stimulation of individual stereocilia of living cochlear hair cells by atomic force microscopy. Ultramicroscopy. 2000;82:269.
Goldsbury C, Scheuring S. Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2002;17.7.1–17
Hörber JKH, Miles M. Science. 2003;302:1002–5.
Braga PC, Ricci D. Atomic force microscopy: biomedical methods and applications. Totowa: Humana Press; 2004.
Connell SDA, Smith DAM. Mol Membr Biol. 2006;23(1):17–28.
Forman JR, Clarke J. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007;17:58.
Yang H, Wang Y, Lai S, An H, Li Y, Chen F. J Food Sci. 2007;72(4):65–5.
Gonçalves RP, Buzhysnskyy N, Scheuring S. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2008;40:133–8.
Liu H, Fu S, Zhu JY, Li H, Zhan H. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2009;45:274–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoerber, J.K.H. (2014). Atomic Force Microscopy: Applications in the Field of Biology. In: Smentkowski, V. (eds) Surface Analysis and Techniques in Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01360-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01360-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01359-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01360-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)