Skip to main content

The Impact of Fulfilling a Desire for Idealism on Task Engagement and Enjoyment in Digital Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Games (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12211))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

For practitioners and researchers who want to design for enjoyment, empirical research on what makes digital games enjoyable is critical. This is true for Game Design, Gamification of non-game applications, and Serious Games with a purpose beyond enjoyment. But existing theories are incomplete or lacking empirical support. A Desire Fulfillment Theory of digital game enjoyment is proposed, building on three established theories: Expectancy Disconfirmation Theory, Basic Human Desires Theory, and Flow Theory. Desire Fulfillment Theory suggests systems that fulfill users’ basic human desires will maximize enjoyment. An online survey of 315 game players was conducted, focusing on the last digital game they played. Idealism, a desire to improve society, stood out as having the greatest impact (highest R2) on the Task Engagement (flow not including enjoyment) factors Concentration and Sense of Control among the factors tested, and greater Task Engagement in turn increased Enjoyment. Multiple linear regression results support the proposed model with minor revisions. The revised model shows how Clear Proximal Goals, Immediate Progress Feedback, and Desire Fulfillment: Idealism lead to Task Engagement and Enjoyment. This is the first empirical evidence the authors are aware of that fulfilling a desire for Idealism leads to Task Engagement and Enjoyment in digital games. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Entertainment Software Association: 2019 Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caillois, R.: Man, Play, and Games. University of Illinois Press, Champaign (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartle, R.: Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. J. MUD Res. 1, 19 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lazzaro, N.: Why we play games: four keys to more emotion without story (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lazzaro, N.: Why we play: affect and the fun of games. In: Human-Computer Interaction: Designing for Diverse Users and Domains, pp. 155–176 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan, R.M., Rigby, S.C., Przybylski, A.: The motivational pull of video games: a self-determination theory approach. Motivat. Emot. 30, 344–360 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura, J., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: The concept of flow. In: Csikszentmihalyi, M. (ed.) Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, pp. 239–263. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Brockmyer, J.H., Fox, C.M., Curtiss, K.A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K.M., Pidruzny, J.N.: The development of the game engagement questionnaire: a measure of engagement in video game-playing. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 624–634 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yee, N.: Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychol. behavior. 9, 772–775 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yee, N., Ducheneaut, N., Nelson, L.: Online gaming motivations scale: development and validation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2803–2806. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malone, T.W.: What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small Systems, pp. 162–169. ACM, New York (1980). https://doi.org/10.1145/800088.802839

  13. Malone, T.W.: Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cogn. Sci. 5, 333–369 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Korhonen, H., Montola, M., Arrasvuori, J.: Understanding playful user experience through digital games. In: International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. Citeseer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quick, J.M., Atkinson, R.K., Lin, L.: Empirical taxonomies of gameplay enjoyment: personality and video game preference. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. 2, 11–31 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schaffer, O., Fang, X.: Digital game enjoyment: a literature review. In: Fang, X. (ed.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11595, pp. 191–214. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22602-2_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, pp. 9–15. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oliver, R.L.: Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: an alternative interpretation. J. Appl. Psychol. 62, 480–486 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.4.480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliver, R.L.: A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 17, 460–469 (1980). https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reiss, S.: Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: the theory of 16 basic desires. Rev. Gener. Psychol. 8, 179–193 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.3.179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schaffer, O.: A desire fulfillment theory of digital game enjoyment. Coll. Comput. Digit. Media Dissertat. 18 (2019). https://via.library.depaul.edu/cdm_etd/18

  23. Schaffer, O., Fang, X.: Impact of task and interface design on flow. Presented at the HCI Research in MIS Workshop (SIGHCI) at the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Dublin, Ireland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. McAuley, E., Duncan, T., Tammen, V.V.: Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 60, 48–58 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189– 194. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 94–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 24, 574–594 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46, 186–204 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Havercamp, S.M.: The Reiss profile of motivation sensitivity: reliability, validity, and social desirability (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reiss, S., Havercamp, S.M.: Toward a comprehensive assessment of fundamental motivation: factor structure of the Reiss Profiles. Psychol. Assess. 10, 97–106 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schaffer, O., Fang, X.: What makes games fun? Card sort reveals 34 sources of computer game enjoyment. Presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2018, New Orleans (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Owen Schaffer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schaffer, O., Fang, X. (2020). The Impact of Fulfilling a Desire for Idealism on Task Engagement and Enjoyment in Digital Games. In: Fang, X. (eds) HCI in Games. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12211. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50164-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50164-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50163-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50164-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics