Skip to main content

The Methodological Intricacies of Researching Strategies, Modes, and Styles of Media Use and Reception

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How We Use the Media

Abstract

Research into strategies, modes, and modalities of media use and reception is characterized by a remarkable methodological diversity—in this volume but also in general. This chapter therefore aims at mapping and discussing some of the methodological approaches in this book but also in relevant research to date. These approaches are discussed in the context of some key methodological challenges posed by both the field’s particular object and perspective of research. Extending the discussion in Krämer and Frey (2019), this chapter elaborates on three interconnected methodological challenges that pose themselves to a particular degree when approaching strategies or modalities of media use and reception empirically: (1) Developing appropriate strategies of data collection to capture inaccessible elements of strategies, modes or modalities; (2) accommodating empirically the comprehensiveness and richness of theoretical concepts like strategies, modes and modalities; and (3) observing or experimentally manipulating the reception process without adulterating it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bitbol, M., & Petitmengin, C. (2013). On the possibility and reality of introspection. Kairos, 6, 173–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böcking, S. (2008). Suspension of disbelief. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 11, pp. 4913–4915). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1953). A history of introspection. Psychological Bulletin, 50(3), 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, T. (2018). Dialogic introspection—A method of investigating experience. Human Arenas, 1(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0027-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, T., Kleining, G., & Witt, H. (Eds.). (2010). Dialogic introspection: A group-based method to explore personal experience by self-observation. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coon, D. J. (1993). Standardizing the subject: Experimental psychologists, introspection, and the quest for a technoscientific ideal. Technology and Culture, 34(4), 757–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1980). The history of introspection reconsidered. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 241–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1999). Bauplan für eine Seele [Blueprint for a mind]. Reinbek, Germany: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, F. (2017). Medienrezeption als Erfahrung. Theorie und empirische Validierung eines integrativen Rezeptionsmodus [Media reception as experience. Conceptualization and empirical validation of an integrative mode of media reception]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, F. (2018). The experiential mode of media reception: A holistic framework concept. Communication Theory, 28, 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2003). Phenomenology and experimental design. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10), 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackert, B., & Weger, U. (2018). Introspection and the Würzburg school: Implications for experimental psychology today. European Psychologist, 23(3), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasebrink, U. (2004). Konvergenz aus Nutzerperspektive: Das Konzept der Kommunikationsmodi [Convergence from the user’s perspective]. In U. Hasebrink, L. Mikos, & E. Prommer (Eds.), Mediennutzung in konvergierenden Medienumgebungen [Media use in converging media environments] (pp. 67–86). München, Germany: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, G. (2005). Introspective evidence in psychology. In P. Achinstein (Ed.), Scientific evidence: Philosophical theories & applications (pp. 259–286). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., & Heavey, C. L. (2006). Exploring inner experience: The Descriptive Experience Sampling method. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Suckfüll, M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack, A. I., & Roepstorff, A. (2003). Why trust the subject? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10), v–xx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, T. (2010). Macht der Gewohnheit? Der Einfluss der Habitualisierung auf die Fernsehnutzung [Force of habit? Habitualization’s influence on television viewing]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verl. für Sozialwiss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, B. (2013). Strategies of media use: Strategien der Mediennutzung. Studies in Communication|Media, 2(2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2013-2-199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, B., & Frey, F. (2019). Measuring strategies of media use. Methodological approaches and the ‘techno-phenomenological gap’. In C. Peter, T. Naab, & R. Kühne (Eds.), Measuring media use and exposure. Recent developments and challenges (pp. 15–37). Köln, Germany: Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn, S., Fernyhough, C., Alderson-Day, B., & Hurlburt, R. T. (2014). Inner experience in the scanner: Can high fidelity apprehensions of inner experience be integrated with fMRI? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepa, S., & Seifert, M. (2016). Embodied listening modes as part of habitual music media orientations: Relating young adults’ audio technology use with their music socialization and taste preferences. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.31165/nk.2016.92.430

  • Linge, D. E. (1973). Dilthey and Gadamer: Two theories of historical understanding. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 41(4), 536–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, A., Lachaux, J.-P., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (2002). Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(3), 1586–1591. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.032658199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, W. E. (1986). The disappearance of introspection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelle, C. (2007). Modes of reception: A consolidated analytical framework. The Communication Review, 10(3), 181–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420701528057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naab, T. K., & Schnauber, A. (2016). Habitual initiation of media use and a response-frequency measure for its examination. Media Psychology, 19(1), 126–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.951055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science, 5, 229–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, T. (2009). A new conception of spatial presence: Once again, with feeling. Communication Theory, 19(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01340.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4), 533–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Northwestern University studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, W. (2005). Gibt es einen transmedialen Nutzungsstil? Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Hinweise [Trans-media use patterns — Do they exist? Theory and empirical evidence]. Publizistik, 50(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-005-0125-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, W. (2006). Transmedialer Nutzungsstil und Rezipientenpersönlichkeit. Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Hinweise [Trans-media use-styles and recipient’s personality. Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence]. Publizistik, 51(3), 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-006-0108-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2016). Introspection. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/introspection/

  • Stanley, S. (2012). Mindfulness: Towards a critical relational perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00454.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F. (1994). Response processes in social judgement. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 287–322). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suckfüll, M. (2004). Rezeptionsmodalitäten: Ein integratives Konstrukt für die Medienwirkungsforschung [Reception modes: An integrative construct for media effects research]. München, Germany: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suckfüll, M. (2007). Emotionale Modalitäten der Filmrezeption [Emotional modes of film reception]. In A. Bartsch, J. Eder, & K. Fahlenbrach (Eds.), Audiovisuelle Emotionen. Emotionsdarstellung und Emotionsvermittlung durch audiovisuelle Medienangebote [Audiovisual emotions. Emotion representation and communication through audiovisual media messages] (pp. 218–237). Köln, Germany: Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suckfüll, M. (2008). Rezeptionsmodalitäten [Reception modalities]. In N. C. Krämer, D. Unz, & M. Suckfüll (Eds.), Medienpsychologie: Schlüsselbegriffe und Konzepte [Media psychology: Key terms and concepts] (pp. 123–128). Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suckfüll, M., & Scharkow, M. (2009). Modes of reception for fictional films. Communications, 34(4), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. A. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M. (2018). Qualia. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2018 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/qualia/

  • Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology. A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermersch, P. (1994). L’entretien d’explicitation. Paris: ESF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, R. (2001). Fern-Sehen im Alltag: Zur Sozialpsychologie der Medienrezeption [Tele-vision: On the social psychology of media reception]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, R. (2005). Sinn und Form—Rezeptionsmodalitäten als Bewusstseinseinstellungen [Meaning and form—Reception modes as attitudes of consciousness]. In V. Gehrau, H. Bilandzic, & J. Woelke (Eds.), Rezeptionsstrategien und Rezeptionsmodalitäten [Reception strategies and modalities] (pp. 59–76). München, Germany: Reinhard Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesing, L. (2014). The philosophy of perception: Phenomenology and image theory. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, H. (2010). Introspektion [Introspection]. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie [Handbook qualitative research in psychology] (pp. 491–505). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woelke, J. (2005). Wie beobachten? Überlegungen zur Operationalisierung und Analyse von Rezeptionsstrategien [How to observe? Reflections on the operationalization and analysis of media reception strategies]. In V. Gehrau, H. Bilandzic, & J. Woelke (Eds.), Rezeptionsstrategien und Rezeptionsmodalitäten [Reception strategies and modalities] (pp. 127–146). München, Germany: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillich, A. F. (2014). Watching television with others. The influence of interpersonal communication on entertainment. Communications, 39(2), 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Frey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frey, F., Krämer, B. (2020). The Methodological Intricacies of Researching Strategies, Modes, and Styles of Media Use and Reception. In: Krämer, B., Frey, F. (eds) How We Use the Media . Transforming Communications – Studies in Cross-Media Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41313-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics