Abstract
The question of how the media are being used by individuals has not really entered the canon of traditional research interests and is not commonly used to characterize an established field of research in the discipline. We think this is worth changing. This volume therefore brings together a number of contributions that represent different perspectives, theoretical foundations and methodological approaches on this topic. In their entirety, they provide an overview of the work already done in the field so far and at the same time further develop it. This introductory chapter starts with some reflections on the relevance of this field of research. We then would like to attempt a rough overview of the relevant branches of research in this context in order to finally present and explain the selection of contributions collected in this volume.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bartsch, A., & Schneider, F. M. (2014). Entertainment and politics revisited: How non-escapist forms of entertainment can stimulate political interest and information seeking. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12095
Böcking, S. (2008). Suspension of disbelief. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 11, pp. 4913–4915). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Branigan, E. (1992). Narrative comprehension and film. London: Routledge.
Busselle, R. W., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18, 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
Busselle, R. W., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259
Charlton, M., & Borcsa, M. (1997). Thematische Voreingenommenheit, involvement und Formen der Identifikation [thematic bias, involvement and forms of identification]. In M. Charlton & S. Schneider (Eds.), Rezeptionsforschung [reception research] (pp. 254–267). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08111-1_14
Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
Cunningham, C. (Ed.). (2013). Social networking and impression management: Self-presentation in the digital age. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Döveling, K., Scheve, C. v., & Konijn, E. A. (Eds.). (2011). The Routledge handbook of emotions and mass media. London: Routledge.
Frey, F. (2017). Medienrezeption als Erfahrung: Theorie und empirische Validierung eines integrativen Rezeptionsmodus [media reception as experience. Theory and empirical validation of an integrative reception mode]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Frey, F. (2018). The experiential mode of media reception: A holistic framework concept. Communication Theory, 28, 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty010
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–341). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies 1972–79 (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.
Hasebrink, U. (2004). Konvergenz aus Nutzerperspektive: Das Konzept der Kommunikationsmodi [convergence from the user’s perspective. The concept of communication modes]. In U. Hasebrink, L. Mikos, & E. Prommer (Eds.), Mediennutzung in konvergierenden Medienumgebungen [Media use in converging media environments] (pp. 67–86). München: Fischer.
Hasebrink, U., & Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications, 31(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.023
Hölig, S. (2014). Informationsorientierte Kommunikationsmodi zwischen Massen- und interpersonaler Kommunikation [information-oriented communication modes between mass and interpersonal communication]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Klimmt, C., & Vorderer, P. (2010). Media entertainment. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, & D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 345–361). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Konijn, E. A. (2013). The role of emotion in media use and effects. In K. E. Dill (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of media psychology (pp. 186–211). New York: Oxford University Press.
Krämer, B. (2013). Strategies of media use. Studies in Communication/Media, 2, 199–222.
Krämer, B., & Frey, F. (2019). Measuring strategies of media use: Methodological approaches and the ‘techno-phenomenological gap’. In C. Peter, T. Naab, & R. Kühne (Eds.), Measuring media use and exposure: Recent developments and challenges (pp. 15–37). Köln: Herbert von Halem.
Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1986). Patterns of involvement in television fiction: A comparative analysis. European Journal of Communication, 1(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323186001002004
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), 0. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
Loschky, L. C., Hutson, J. P., Smith, M. E., Smith, T. J., & Magliano, J. P. (2018). Viewing static visual narratives through the lens of the scene perception and event comprehension theory (SPECT). In A. Dunst, J. Laubrock, & J. Wildfeuer (Eds.), Empirical comics research: Digital, multimodal, and cognitive methods (pp. 217–238). New York, NY: Routledge.
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 297–384). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Michelle, C. (2007). Modes of reception: A consolidated analytical framework. The Communication Review, 10(3), 181–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420701528057
Michelle, C. (2009). (Re)contextualising audience receptions of reality TV. Participations, 6(1), 137–170.
Michelle, C., Davis, C. H., & Vladica, F. (2012). Understanding variation in audience engagement and response: An application of the composite model to receptions of Avatar (2009). The Communication Review, 15(2), 106–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2012.674467
Morley, D. (1980). The “Nationwide” audience. London: BFI.
Neuman, W. R. (1982). Television and American culture: The mass medium and the pluralist audience. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 471–487.
Nilsson, N. C., Nordahl, R., & Serafin, S. (2016). Immersion revisited: A review of existing definitions of immersion and their relation to different theories of presence. Human Technology, 12(2), 108–134. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201611174652
Poletti, A., & Rak, J. (Eds.). (2014). Identity technologies: Constructing the self online. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Rapp, U. (1973). Handeln und Zuschauen: Untersuchungen über den theatersoziologischen Aspekt in der menschlichen Interaktion [acting and watching. Studies on the theater sociological aspect in human interaction]. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.
Richardson, K., & Corner, J. (1986). Reading reception: Mediation and transparency in viewers’ accounts of a TV programme. Media, Culture & Society, 8(4), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443786008004007
Schrøder, K. C. (1988). The pleasure of ‘dynasty’: The weekly reconstruction of self-confidence. In P. Drummond & R. Paterson (Eds.), Television and its audience: International research perspectives (pp. 61–88). London: BFI.
Schubert, T. (2009). A new conception of spatial presence: Once again, with feeling. Communication Theory, 19(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01340.x
Schweiger, W. (2005). Gibt es einen transmedialen Nutzungsstil? Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Hinweise [Transmedia use patterns – Do they exist? Theory and empirical evidence]. Publizistik, 50(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-005-0125-5
Schweiger, W. (2006). Transmedialer Nutzungsstil und Rezipientenpersönlichkeit. Heoretische Überlegungen und empirische Hinweise [trans-media use-styles and recipient’s personality. Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence]. Publizistik, 51(3), 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-006-0108-1
Segal, E. M. (1995). Narrative comprehension and the role of deictic shift theory. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smythe, D. W. (1981). Dependency road. Communications, capitalism, consciousness and Canada. Norwood: Ablex.
Suckfüll, M. (2004). Rezeptionsmodalitäten. Ein integratives Konstrukt für die Medienwirkungsforschung [Reception modes: An integrative construct for media effects research]. München: Fischer.
Suckfüll, M., & Scharkow, M. (2009). Modes of reception for fictional films. Communications, 34(4), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.023
Vorderer, P. (1992). Fernsehen als Handlung: Fernsehfilmrezeption aus motivationspsychologischer Perspektive [watching TV as action. TV movie reception form a motivation psychological perspective]. Berlin: Ed. Sigma.
Weiß, R. (2001). Fern-Sehen im Alltag: Zur Sozialpsychologie der Medienrezeption [Tele-vision in everyday life: On the social psychology of media reception]. Wiesbaden: Westdt. Verl.
Weiß, R. (2005). Sinn und form: Rezeptionsmodalitäten als Bewusstseinseinstellungen [meaning and form – Reception modes as attitudes of consciousness]. In V. Gehrau, H. Bilandzic, & J. Woelke (Eds.), Rezeptionsstrategien und Rezeptionsmodalitäten [reception strategies and modalities] (pp. 59–76). München: Verl. Reinhard Fischer.
Wilson, T. (2009). Understanding media users. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Böcking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., et al. (2007). A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology, 9(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701283079
Wirth, W., & Schramm, H. (2005). Media and emotions. Communication Research Trends, 24(3), 3–39.
Worth, S., & Gross, L. (1974). Symbolic strategies. Journal of Communication, 24(4), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00405.x
Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer. Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation vol. 44 (pp. 35–62). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frey, F., Krämer, B. (2020). Strategies, Modes and Styles of Media Use and Reception: An Introduction. In: Krämer, B., Frey, F. (eds) How We Use the Media . Transforming Communications – Studies in Cross-Media Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41313-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41313-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41312-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41313-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)