Skip to main content

Robots Improve Judgments on Self-generated Actions: An Intentional Binding Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11876))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In near future, robots will become a fundamental part of our daily life; therefore, it appears crucial to investigate how they can successfully interact with humans. Since several studies already pointed out that a robotic agent can influence human’s cognitive mechanisms such as decision-making and joint attention, we focus on Sense of Agency (SoA). To this aim, we employed the Intentional Binding (IB) task to implicitly assess SoA in human-robot interaction (HRI). Participants were asked to perform an IB task alone (Individual condition) or with the Cozmo robot (Social condition). In the Social condition, participants were free to decide whether they wanted to let Cozmo press. Results showed that participants performed the action significantly more often than Cozmo. Moreover, participants were more precise in reporting the occurrence of a self-made action when Cozmo was also in charge of performing the task. However, this improvement in evaluating self-performance corresponded to a reduction in SoA. In conclusion, the present study highlights the double effect of robots as social companions. Indeed, the social presence of the robot leads to a better evaluation of self-generated actions and, at the same time, to a reduction of SoA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glasauer, S., Huber, M., Basili, P., Knoll, A., Brandt, T.: Interacting in time and space: investigating human-human and human-robot joint action. In: 19th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 252–257 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wykowska, A., Chaminade, T., Cheng, G.: Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition. Philos. Trans. B 371, 20150375 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shinozawa, K., Naya, F., Yamato, J., Kogure, K.: Differences in effect of robot and screen-agent recommendations on human decision-making. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 62(2), 267–279 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J., Kim, E.S., Scassellati, B.: The Effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, 1–3 August 2008

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kompatsiari, K., Pèrez-Osorio, J., De Tommaso, D., Metta, G., Wykowska, A.: Neuroscientifically-grounded research for improved human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Madrid, Spain, 1–5 October 2018, pp. 3403–3408. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kompatsiari, K., Ciardo, F., Tikhanoff, V., Metta, G., Wykowska, A.: On the role of eye contact in gaze-cueing. Sci. rep. 14, 8(1), 17842 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W.: Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition 88, B11–B21 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ciardo, F., Wykowska, A.: Response coordination emerges in cooperative but not competitive joint task. Front. Psychol. 9, 1919 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stenzel, A., Chinellato, E., Tirado Bou, M.A., Del Pobil, A.P., Lappe, M., Liepelt, R.: When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: corepresentation of robotic actions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 38(5), 1073–1077 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallagher, S.: Philosophical conception of the self: implication for cognitive science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(1), 14–21 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daprati, E., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Proust, J., Pacherie, E., Dalery, J., et al.: Looking for the agent: an investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition 65, 7186 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gallagher, S.: Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology 30, 15–31 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ciardo, F., De Tommaso, D., Beyer, F., Wykowska, A.: Attribution of intentional agency toward robots reduces one’s own sense of agency. Cognition 194, 104109 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haggard, P.: Sense of agency in the human brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18(4), 196–207 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haggard, P., Clark, S.: Kalogeras, J: Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 382–385 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haggard, P., Clark, S.: Intentional action: conscious experience and neural prediction. Conscious. Cogn. 12, 695–707 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsakiris, M., Haggard, P.: Awareness of somatic events associated with a voluntary action. Exp. Brain Res. 149, 439–446 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sahaï, A., Desantis, A., Grynszpan, O., Pacherie, E., Berberian, B.: Action co-representation and the sense of agency during a joint Simon task: comparing human and machine co-agents. Conscious. Cogn. 67, 44–55 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Obhi, S.S., Hall, P.: Sense of agency in joint actions: influence of human and computer co-actors. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 663–670 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Strother, L., House, K.A., Obhi, S.S.: Subjective agency and awareness of shared actions. Conscious. Cogn. 19, 12–20 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cozmo SDK Installation for Windows. https://cozmosdk.anki.com/docs/install-win-dows.html. Accessed 22 May 2019

  22. Android Debug Bridge. cozmosdk.anki.com/docs/adb.html, Accessed 22 May 2019

  23. Obhi, S.S., Hall, P.: Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint actions. Exp. Brain Res. 22, 655–662 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chambon, V., Moore, J.W., Haggard, P.: TMS stimulation over the inferior parietal cortex disrupts prospective sense of agency. Brain Struct. Funct. 220(6), 3627–3639 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zajonc, R.B.: Social facilitation. Science 149(3681), 269–274 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Bonicalzi, S., Haggard, P.: Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12(1), 138–145 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant awarded to AW, titled “InStance: Intentional Stance for Social Attunement.” G.A. No: ERC-2016-StG-715058).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cecilia Roselli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Roselli, C., Ciardo, F., Wykowska, A. (2019). Robots Improve Judgments on Self-generated Actions: An Intentional Binding Study. In: Salichs, M., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35887-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35888-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics