Skip to main content

Attributing Intentionality to Artificial Agents: Exposure Versus Interactive Scenarios

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13817))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 995 Accesses

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that people can interact with robots as social agents. However, it is still unclear what mental processes people rely on when interacting with robots. One core process in social cognition is the adoption of intentional stance, a strategy that humans use to interpret the behavior of others with reference to mental states. In this work, we sought to examine how the adoption of intentional stance may be modulated by the type of behaviors exhibited by a virtual robot and the context in which people are exposed to it. We developed an interactive virtual task and used the InStance Test to measure the attribution of intentionality to the robot. Our results show that participants attributed more intentionality to the virtual robot after interacting with it, independently of the type of behavior. Leveraging data from a previous study, we also show this increase is stronger than in a non-interactive, purely observational scenario. This study thus improves our understanding of how different contexts can affect the attribution of intentional stance and anthropomorphism in Human-Robot Interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Frith, C.D., Frith, U.: Mechanisms of social cognition. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 63(1), 287–313 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dennett, D.C.: The journal of philosophy, Inc., intentional systems: J. Philos. 68(4), 87–106 (1971). https://doi.org/10.2307/2025382

  3. Dennett, D.C.: Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: the panglossian paradigm defended. Behav. Brain Sci. 6(3), 343–355 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00016393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perez-Osorio, J., Wykowska, A.: Adopting the intentional stance toward natural and artificial agents. Philos. Psychol. 33(3), 369–395 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1688778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marchesi, S., Ghiglino, D., Ciardo, F., Perez-Osorio, J., Baykara, E., Wykowska, A.: Do we adopt the intentional stance toward humanoid robots? Front. Psychol. 10, 450 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bossi, F., Willemse, C., Cavazza, J., Marchesi, S., Murino, V., Wykowska, A.: The human brain reveals resting state activity patterns that are predictive of biases in attitudes toward robots. Sci. Robot. 5(46), eabb6652 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abb6652

  7. Abubshait, A., Wykowska, A.: Repetitive robot behavior impacts perception of intentionality and gaze-related attentional orienting. Front. Robot. AI 7, 565825 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.565825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Perez-Osorio, J., Marchesi, S., Ghiglino, D., Ince, M., Wykowska, A.: More than you expect: priors influence on the adoption of intentional stance toward humanoid robots. In: Salichs, M.A., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11876, pp. 119–129. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Abubshait, A., Perez-Osorio, J., Tommaso, D.D., Wykowska, A.: Collaboratively framed interactions increase the adoption of intentional stance towards robots. In: 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 886–891 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515515

  10. Bergmann, K., Eyssel, F., Kopp, S.: A second chance to make a first impression? how appearance and nonverbal behavior affect perceived warmth and competence of virtual agents over time. In: Nakano, Y., Neff, M., Paiva, A., Walker, M. (eds.) IVA 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7502, pp. 126–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 114(4), 864–886 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams, E.H., Cristino, F., Cross, E.S.: Human body motion captures visual attention and elicits pupillary dilation. Cognition 193, 104029 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heider, F., Simmel, M.: An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am. J. Psychol. 57(2), 243 (1944). https://doi.org/10.2307/1416950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bossema, M., Saunders, R., Allouch, S.B.: Robot body movements and the intentional stance, presented at the first international workshop on designerly HRI knowledge. In: IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Perez-Osorio, J., Wykowska, A.: Adopting the intentional stance towards humanoid robots. In: Laumond, J.-P., Danblon, E., Pieters, C. (eds.) Wording Robotics. STAR, vol. 130, pp. 119–136. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17974-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Ciardo, F., De Tommaso, D., Wykowska, A.: Human-like behavioral variability blurs the distinction between a human and a machine in a nonverbal turing test. Sci. Robot. 7(68), eabo1241 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abo1241

  17. Parenti, L., Marchesi, S., Belkaid, M., Wykowska, A.: Exposure to robotic virtual agent affects adoption of intentional stance. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, Virtual Event Japan, pp. 348–353 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3472307.3484667

  18. Schilbach, L., et al.: Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behav. Brain Sci. 36(4), 393–414 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dominey, P.F.: Reciprocity between second-person neuroscience and cognitive robotics. Behav. Brain Sci. 36(4), 418–419 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiss, A., Bartneck, C.: Meta analysis of the usage of the godspeed questionnaire series. In: 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Kobe, Japan, pp. 381–388 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333568

  21. Bruna, M.T., Cuijpers, R.H., Ham, J.R.C., Torta, E.: The benefits of using high-level goal information for robot navigation. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Metta, G., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., Natale, L., Nori, F.: The iCub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition. In: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems - PerMIS ’08, Gaithersburg, Maryland, p. 50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1774674.1774683

  23. Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, Encyclopedia Britannica (2014). https://www.britannica.com/art/cups-and-balls-trick

  24. Spatola, N., Marchesi, S., Wykowska, A.: the intentional stance test-2: how to measure the tendency to adopt intentional stance towards robots. Front. Robot. AI 8, 666586 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.666586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(1), 71–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marchesi, S., De Tommaso, D., Perez-Osorio, J., Wykowska, A.: Belief in sharing the same phe-nomenological experience increases the likelihood of adopting the intentional stance toward a humanoid robot. Technol. Mind Behav. 3(3), 11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000072

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Wykowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Parenti, L., Marchesi, S., Belkaid, M., Wykowska, A. (2022). Attributing Intentionality to Artificial Agents: Exposure Versus Interactive Scenarios. In: Cavallo, F., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13817. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24667-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24667-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24666-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24667-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics