Abstract
In this chapter, we shift from “what is” to “what might be.” We begin by exploring some criteria for identifying real-world challenges that provide greater impetus and opportunity for applying integrated FEW science to real-world practice. There is the greatest opportunity for FEW Nexus applications to improve outcomes where there is a specific combination of scarcity, competition, externalities, and shared benefits. This often involves the invention of mechanisms for cooperation, reallocation of resources, sharing of private data, transactions across system boundaries, and the limited but proper role of government and law and, more broadly, the community of science and practice in the FEW nexus. We conclude with a number of case studies of Nexus work and practice that epitomize the opportunities that exist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blomgren Bingham, L., Nabatchi,T., O’Leary, R. (2005). The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x.
Daher, B. T., & Mohtar, R. H. (2015). Water-energy-food (WEF) Nexus Tool 2.0: guiding integrative resource planning and decision-making, Water International, https://doi.org/02508060.2015.1074148.
Randall, L. (2011). Knocking on heaven’s door: How physics and scientific thinking illuminate the universe and the modern world. USA: HarperCollins Publishers.
Rosen, R. A., Daher, B., & Mohtar, R. H. (2018). Water-energy-food nexus stakeholder information sharing and engagement workshop. Texas A&M University. Available at https://www.water-energy-food.org/resources/resources-detail/workshop-report-water-energy-food-nexus-stakeholder-information-sharing-and-engagement-workshop/.
Further Reading
An, L. (2012). Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 229(2012), 25–36.
Bazilian, M., Rogner, H., Howells, M., Hermann, S., Arent, D., Gielen, D., Steduto, P., Mueller, A., Komor, P., & Tol, R. S. J. (2011). Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy, 39, 7896–7906.
Garrick, D., & Hall, J. W. (2014). Water security and society: Risks, metrics, and pathways. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 611–639.
Hoolohan, C., Larkin, A., McLachlan, C., Falconer, R., Soutar, I., Suckling, J., et al. (2018). Engaging stakeholders in research to address water–energy–food (WEF) nexus challenges. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1415–1426.
Ingwersen, W., et al. (2014). Integrated metrics for improving the life cycle approach to assessing product system sustainability. Sustainability, 6(3), 1386–1413.
Kehrer, J., & Hauser, H. (2013). Visualization and visual analysis of multifaceted scientific data: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(3), 495–513.
Kraucunas, I., et al. (2015). Investigating the nexus of climate, energy, water, and land at decision-relevant scales: The Platform for Regional Integrated Modeling and Analysis (PRIMA). Climatic Change, 129(3–4), 573–588.
Kurian, M., Ardakanian, R., Veiga, L. G., & Meyer, K. (2016). Resources, services and risks: How can data observatories bridge the science-policy divide in environmental governance? New York: Springer.
Mercure, J. F., Pollitt, H., Bassi, A. M., Viñuales, J. E., & Edwards, N. R. (2016). Modelling complex systems of heterogeneous agents to better design sustainability transitions policy. Global Environmental Change, 37(2016), 102–115.
Miralles-Wilhelm, F. (2016). Development and application of integrative modeling tools in support of food–energy–water nexus planning—A research agenda. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0361-1.
Mohtar, R. (2018). Opportunities in the water–energy–food nexus approach: Innovatively driving economic development, social wellbeing, and environmental sustainability. Science of the Total Environment Special Issue. Available online at https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/science-of-the-total-environment/special-issue/10K1703WP3V.
Mohtar, R. H., & Daher, B. (2016). Water–energy–food nexus framework for facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogue. Water International. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1149759.
Mohtar, R. H., & Lawford, R. (2016). Present and future of the water–energy–food nexus and the role of the community of practice. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6, 192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0378-5.
Mohtar, R. H. (2017). Making the leap into the nexus: Changing nexus. Presentation at the Watershed conference, Vatican City, 22 Mar 2017.
None. (2016). Identifying interdisciplinary data science approaches and challenges to enhance understanding of interactions of food systems with energy and water systems. http://www.spatial.cs.umn.edu/few/few_report_draft.pdf.
NSF (website) Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy and Water Systems (INFEWS), National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=505241.
Roy, B. (1993). Decision science or decision-aid science? European Journal of Operational Research, 66(2), 184–203.
Serrat-Capdevila, A., Valdes, J. B., & Gupta, H. V. (2011). Decision support systems in water resources planning and management: Stakeholder participation and the sustainable path to science-based decision making. In C. Jao (Ed.), Efficient decision support systems—Practice and challenges from current to future (pp. 423–440). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
Smith, D. W., Welch, M., Bennett, K. E., Padgham, J., & Mohtar, R. (2017). Building a WEF Nexus Community of Practice (NCoP). Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 4, 168–172. Springer.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-017-0080-6.
Stapp, W. B. (2000). Watershed education for sustainable development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9, 183. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009430215477.
Strachan, N., Fais, B., & Daly, H. (2016). Reinventing the energy modelling–policy interface. Nature Energy, 1, 16012.
Tevar, A. D., Aelion, H. M., Stang, M. A., & Mendlovic, J. (2016). The need for universal metrics in the energy–water-food nexus. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(1), 225–230.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kinne, B. et al. (2020). Opportunities at the Nexus. In: Saundry, P., Ruddell, B. (eds) The Food-Energy-Water Nexus. AESS Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies and Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29914-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29914-9_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29913-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29914-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)