Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Building a WEF Nexus Community of Practice (NCoP)

  • Nexus of Food, Water, Energy (R Mohtar, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purposes of this paper are to examine the literature for common threads and attributes inherent to scientific-based communities of practice, and to identify challenges and potential solutions for building a community of scientists to address the water-energy-food nexus.

Recent Findings

The latest research suggests several guiding principles to build and maintain a successful scientific community of practice. These include the following: identifying a shared conceptual vision that is clear in purpose, but also provides for evolution and growth; providing for both internal and external perspectives as well as various levels of participation among members; and facilitating collaboration that satisfies personal and professional motivations.

Summary

There are several challenges in building and maintaining a sustainable water-energy-food nexus community of practice. Perhaps, the most difficult to overcome is the lack of a clear definition, meaning, and identity of the “water-energy-food nexus.” While international collaboration among researchers will provide critical perspective and insight for addressing similar challenges on a more localized basis, the variation in regional jurisdiction and political realities could restrict international collaborative research and implementation of potential solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Wenger E. Communities of practice: a brief introduction. 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/11736. Accessed December 2016.

  2. Wenger EC, Snyder WM. Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harv Bus Rev. 2000;78(1):139–46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, et al. Sustainability science. Science. 2001;292(5517):641–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, et al. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci. 2012;7(Supp1):25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scholtz RW. Environmental literacy in science and society. From knowledge to decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Kienle A, Wessner M. Principles for cultivating scientific communities of practice. In Communities and Technologies 2005 (pp. 283–299). Springer Netherlands.

  7. Li L, Grimshaw JM, Nielsen C, Judd M, Coyte PC, Graham ID. Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2009;4:27. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-27. http://www.implementationscience.com/content/4/1/27. Accessed December 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Press; 2002.

  9. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press; 1998.

  10. Amin A, Roberts, J. Communities of practice. Varieties of situated learning. Dynamics of Institutions and Markets in Europe research paper. 2006. Oct 27.

  11. •• Mohtar RH, Lawford R. Present and future of the water-energy-food nexus and the role of the community of practice. J Environ Stud Sci. 2016;6:192–9. doi:10.1007/s13412-106-0378-5. This publication is an excellent review of the history of the water-energy-food nexus and a proposed path forward involving an interdisciplinary nexus platform and tools to strengthen sustainable food, water, and energy security.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. • Bhaduri A, Ringler C, Dombrowski I, Mohtar R, Scheumann W. Sustainability in the water–energy–food nexus. Water Int. 2015;40(5–6):723–32. doi:10.1080/02508060.2015.1096110. This issue is a review of tools, solutions, and multi-scale governance approaches to water-energy-food nexus sustainability presented at the Sustainability in the Water-Energy-Food Nexus, in Bonn, Germany, in 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. • Hayes, E. 2016. Water, energy and food security is more complex than you think. Fair Observer. http://www.fairobserver.com/region/europe/water-energy-food-security-complex-think-23945/. This newsletter article presents an overview of the necessity for and real-world examples of the water-energy-food nexus to meet critical sustainability issues.

  14. •• Kurian M. The water-energy-food nexus: tradeoffs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development. Environ Sci Policy. 2017;68:97–106. This publication addresses the challenges of the governance dimension, implementation challenges, evaluation and impact, and tools available to translate scientific research in a water-energy-food nexus approach to support sustainable development.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scott CA, Pierce SA, Pasqualetti MJ, Jones AL, Montz BE, Hoover JH. Policy and institutional dimensions of the water-energy nexus. Energy Policy. 2011;39(10):6622–30. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. • Norris PE, O’Rouke M, Mayer AS, Halvorsen KE. Wicked socio-ecological problems transdisciplinary research approaches. Landsc Urban Plan. 2016;154:115–22. This paper proposes a set of strategies for managing socio-ecological problems that involve transdisciplinary teams.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F. Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ. 2012;79:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Steynor A, Padgham J, Jack C, Hewitson B, Lennard C. Co-exploratory climate risk workshops: experiences from urban Africa. Climate Risk Management. 2016;13:95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vogel C, Scott D, Culwick CE, Sutherland C. Environmental problem-solving in South Africa: harnessing creative imaginaries to address ‘wicked’ challenges and opportunities. S Afr Geogr J. 2016;98(3):515–30. doi:10.1080/03736245.2016.1217256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Texas A&M WEF Nexus initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabi Mohtar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Nexus of Food, Water, Energy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, D.W., Welch, M., Bennett, K.E. et al. Building a WEF Nexus Community of Practice (NCoP). Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep 4, 168–172 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-017-0080-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-017-0080-6

Keywords

Navigation