Skip to main content

Applications of the GSI System to the Classification of Soft Rocks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soft Rock Mechanics and Engineering

Abstract

The chapter deals with the geotechnical classification of weak and complex rock masses. The term “weak rock mass” instead of “soft rock” is generally used in this chapter to highlight better the nature of the examined geomaterial. The weak rock masses that are examined in this study are generated by tectonical compression or weathering either the parent rock is initially soft or not. Cases, where the decreasing of the quality is expressed on the rock mass scale and not necessarily on the primary low intact rock strength is thus presented.

Use of the GSI rock mass classification system and the associated m, s and a parameter relationships linking GSI with the Hoek–Brown failure criterion provides a proven, effective and reliable approach for prediction of rock mass strength for surface and underground excavation design and for rock support selection. The need for geological definition of rock mass properties required as inputs into numerical analysis, allowing for characterisation of even the most problematic of weak and complex rock masses. Back-analyses of tunnels, slopes and foundation behaviour using the approach attest to its reliability. New or revised GSI charts for weak and complex rock masses are presented in this chapter. Specific key engineering geological characteristics that differentiate various igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock units one from each other and generates weak (soft) forms are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afrouz AA (1992) Practical handbook of rock mass classification systems and modes of ground failure. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 195

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1995) The description and classification of weathered rocks for engineering purposes. Geological society engineering. Group working party report. Quart J Eng Geol 28:207–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NR, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6(4):189–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1973) Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Trans South Afr Inst Civ Eng 15:335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1974) Geomechanics classification of rock masses and its application in tunnelling. Proc.3rd Int. Congr. On Rock Mechanics, Vol. IIA, Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Denver, pp. 27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1976) Rock mass classification in rock engineering. In: Bieniawski ZT (ed) Exploration for rock engineering. A.A. Balkema, Johannesburg, pp 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown ET (1981) Rock characterization, testing and monitoring—ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 171–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter T, Marinos V (2014) Use of GSI for rock engineering design. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Applied Empirical Design Methods in Mining, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro LAM, Carvalho J, Sá G (2013) Discussion on how to classify and estimate strength of weak rock masses. In: Dight PM (ed) Slope stability 2013. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Caterpillar (1996) Handbook of ripping, 10th edn. Caterpillar, Inc., Peoria, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney RC, Demars KR, Santi PM, Higgins JD (1998) Methods for predicting shale durability in the field. Geotech Test J 21(3):195

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DR, Wood LE, Lovell CW, Sisiliano WJ (1976) A comparative study of shale classification tests and systems: Technical paper. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearman WR (1976) Weathering classification in the characterization of rock: a revision. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 13:373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortsakis P, Nikas K, Marinos V, Marinos P (2012) Anisotropic behaviour of stratified rockmasses in tunnelling. Eng Geol 141–142(19):74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geological Society Engineering Group Working Party (1995) The description and classification of weathered rock for engineering purposes. Quart J Eng Geol 28(3):207–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Ulusay R, Sonmez H (2000) Factors affecting the durability of selected weak and clay-bearing rocks from Turkey, with particular emphasis on the influence of the number of drying and wetting cycles. Eng Geol 57(2000):215–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway A (1990) Weak Rock poorly lithified cockroaches and snakes. AEG News 33(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (1994) Strength of rock and rock masses. News J Int Soc Rock Mech 2(2):4–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE v. 106, n. GT9, p. 1013–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int Jour Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 34:1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (2018) The Hoek-Brown failure criterion and GSI – 2018 edition, J Rock Mech Geotech Eng, pp 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001

  • Hoek E, Marinos P (2000) Predicting tunnel squeezing in weak heterogeneous masses. Tunn Tunn Int 1. November Issue, pp 45–51; Part 2, December Issue, pp 34–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Marinos P (2007) A brief history of the development of the Hoek-Brown failure criterion. Soil Rock 30(2):85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF (1995) Support of under-ground excavations in hard rock. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Marinos P, Benissi M (1998) Applicability of the Geological Strength Index (GSI) classification for weak and sheared rock masses – the case of the Athens Schist formation. Bull Eng Geol Env 57(2):151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Caranza-Torres CT, Corcum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion - 2002 edition. In: Bawden HRW, Curran J, Telsenicki M (eds) Proc. North American Rock Mechanics Society (NARMS-TAC 2002). Mining Innovation and Technology, Toronto, pp 267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Marinos P, Marinos V (2005) Characterization and engineering properties of tectonically undisturbed but lithologically varied sedimentary rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42(2):277–285

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM) (1981) Commission on classification of rocks and rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Abst 18:85–110

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Rock Mechanics ISRM (1985) Suggested method for determining point load strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 22:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanji MA (2014) Critical issues in soft rocks. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(3):186–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Krank KD, Watters RJ (1983) Geotechnical properties of weathered sierra nevada granodiorite. Environ Eng Geosci XX(2):173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauffer H (1958) Gebirgsklassifizierung für den Stollenbau [Mountain classification for the gallery construction]. Geology Bauwesen (in German). 74(1):46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SG, De Freitas MH (1989) A revision of the description and classification of weathered granite and its application to granites in Korea. Quart J Eng Geol 22(1):31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos P (1993) General report session 1: hard soils-soft rocks: geological features with emphasis to soft rocks. In: Anagnostopoulos A et al (eds) Geotechnical engineering of hard soils-soft rocks. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1807–1818. ISBN 9054103442

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V (2007) Geotechnical classification and engineering geological behaviour of weak and complex rock masses in tunneling. Doctoral thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering Department, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Athens (In greek)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V (2012) Assessing rock mass behaviour for tunnelling. Environ Eng Geosci 18(4):327–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V (2014) Tunnel behaviour and support associated with the weak rock masses of flysch. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos PV (2019) A revised, geotechnical classification GSI system for tectonically disturbed heterogeneous rock masses, such as flysch. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1151-zBOEG-D-17-00268.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Carter T (2018) Maintaining geological reality in application of GSI for design of engineering structures in rock. Eng Geol 239:282–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Drosos G (2010) Τunnelling through gneiss. A competent or a problematic rock mass? Proccedings of the 11th International congress of IAEG (in CD), Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos P, Hoek E (2000) GSI: a geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation. Proc. GeoEng2000 at the Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Melbourne, Technomic publishers, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, pp 1422–1446

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos P, Hoek E (2001) Estimating the geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock masses such as flysch. Bull Eng Geol Env 60:82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Marinos P, Hoek E (2005a) The geological strength index – applications and limitations. Bull Eng Geol Environ 64(1):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos P, Hoek E, Marinos V (2005b) Variability of the engineering properties of rock masses quantified by the geological strength index: the case of ophiolites with special emphasis on tunnelling. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(2):129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Fortsakis P, Prountzopoulos G (2006) Estimation of rock mass properties of heavily sheared flysch using data from tunnelling construction. Proceedings of the 10th International congress of IAEG in Nottingham, paper number 314, in CD

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Fortsakis P, Prountzopoulos G (2011) Estimation of geotechnical properties and classification of geotechnical behaviour in tunnelling for flysch rock masses. In: Anagnostopoulos A et al (eds) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Part 1, Athens, pp 435–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Fortsakis P, Prountzopoulos G (2013a) Tunnel behaviour and support in molassic rocks. The experiences from 12 tunnels in Greece. In: Kwasniewski M, Lydzba D (eds) Rock mechanics for resources, energy and environment (EUROCK2013). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 909–914

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Prountzopoulos G, Fortsakis P, Korkaris K, Koumoutsakos D, Papouli D (2013b) Tunnel information and analysis system: a geotechnical database for tunnels. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 31:891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9570-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Fortsakis P, Stoumpos G (2015) Classification of weak and complex rock masses according to the engineering project type. In: Lollino G et al (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory, vol 6. Springer, Cham, pp 859–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickman M, Spaun G, Thuro K (2006) Engineering geological classification of weak rocks. Proceedings of the 10th International congress of IAEG in Nottingham, paper number 492, in CD

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira R (1993) Weak rock materials. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Engineering Group of the Geological Society, Leeds, UK, September 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Palicki KS (1997) A graphical method for the classification of rock and weak rock masses based on field observations. Eng Environ Geosci 3(1):7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santi PM (1995) Classification and testing of weak and weathered rock materials: a model based on Colorado Shales. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 286 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Santi PM (1997) Comparison of weak and weathered rock classification systems. In: Santi PM, Shakoor A (eds) Characterization of weak and weathered rock masses. Association of Engineering Geologists Special Publication #9. Association of Engineering Geologists, Denver, pp 139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Santi PM (2006) Field methods for characterizing weak rock for engineering. Environ Eng Geosci XII(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santi PM, Doyle BC (1997) The locations and engineering characteristics of weak rock in the U.S. In: Santi PM, Shakoor A (eds) Characterization of weak and weathered rock masses. Association of Engineering Geologists Special Publication #9. Association of Engineering Geologists, Sudbury, MA, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Santi PM, Shakoor A (eds) (1997) Characterization of weak and weathered rock masses, association of engineering geologists special publication #9: Association of engineering geologists, Sudbury, MA, 233 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HJ (1997) The point load test for weak rock in dredging applications. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 34(295):3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey TR, Page CH (1986) Practical handbook for underground rock mechanics. Trans Tech. Publications, Clausthal-Zellerfeld

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1946) Rock defects and load on tunnel supports. In: Proctor RV, White TL (eds) Introduction to rock tunnelling with steel supports. Commercial Shearing & Stamping Co., Youngtown

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsiambaos G, Sabatakakis N (2004) Considerations on strength of intact sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 72:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi J, Medley EW (2004) Geological characterization of mélanges for practitioners. Felsbau 22(5):10–43

    Google Scholar 

  • White RM, Richardson TL (1987) Predicting the difficulty and cost of excavation in the Piedmont. In: Smith RE (ed) Foundations and excavations in decomposed rock of the piedmont province: ASCE geotechnical special publication No. 9: ASCE, New York, pp. 15–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham GE, Tiedeman HR, Skinner EH (1979) Ground support prediction model-RSR Concept. Proceedings, Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference, AIME, New York, pp 691–707

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to Evert Hoek and Paul Marinos for their insight in initially developing the GSI approach. The author would also like to thank Egnatia Odos S.A. for its support and the data provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marinos Vassilis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vassilis, M. (2020). Applications of the GSI System to the Classification of Soft Rocks. In: Kanji, M., He, M., Ribeiro e Sousa, L. (eds) Soft Rock Mechanics and Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29477-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics