Skip to main content

Simulating Religions as Adaptive Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Simulation: Perspectives, Insights, and Applications

Part of the book series: New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion ((NASR,volume 7))

Abstract

Religious communities exhibit many features of complex adaptive systems (CASs). They are open systems whose global features nonlinearly emerge from the interactions of their components, are complexly internally structured, and must adaptively respond to continual perturbations in their environments. This chapter presents a system dynamics model (SDM) of a generic religious organization represented as a CAS. The simulated community extracts energy from an ecological resource base and expends energy on distinct, mutually exclusive goals: reproduction, energy-seeking, and ritual. Although energy that is spent on ritual cannot be spent on utilitarian objectives, ritual performance increases the perceived legitimacy of the religious system, thereby motivating higher levels of cooperation. Low levels of perceived legitimacy can trigger a switch to a charismatic version of authority. In experiments, we found that many simulated communities maximized their populations by outstripping their resource base shortly before collapsing, in a classic example of boom-and-bust ecological overshoot. However, certain communities showed greater longevity if the Charisma parameter was maximized. We interpret our results to suggest that increasing social flexibility in response to crises of legitimacy may contribute to the resilience of certain types of social, including religious, systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The charismatic Catholic response to shifting social and cultural mores may also be an example of positive feedback driving permanent alterations in the dynamics of religious systems.

References

  • Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. 1993. Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. 2002. In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., and J. Ginges. 2012. Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science 336 (6083): 855–857. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J.L. 2012. Born believers: The science of childhood religion belief. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, N., and C. Chevallier. 2015. The nature and dynamics of world religions: A life-history approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282 (1818): 20151593. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R.F., K.D. Vohs, J.L. Aaker, and E.N. Garbinsky. 2013. Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology 8 (6): 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. 2008. Why religion is nothing special but is central. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363 (1499): 2055–2061. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J.S., R.R. Hudson, and S.J.C. Gaulin. 1998. High paternity certainties of Jewish priests. American Anthropologist 100 (4): 967–971. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1998.100.4.967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, E., ed. 1973. Religion altered states of consciousness and social change. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, E. 1976. Possession. San Francisco: Chandler & Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, E.L. 2018. The rise of charismatic Catholicism in Latin America. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, M., ed. 2011. The globalization of Pentecostalism: A religion made to travel. Eugene: Wipf & Stock Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doniger, W. 1973. Asceticism and eroticism in the mythology of Åšiva. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. 1986. How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, É. 2008. The elementary forms of religious life. Trans. C. Cosman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J.W. 1971. Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Theory and Decision 2 (2): 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1973. World dynamics. Wright-Allen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V.E. 2006. Man’s search for meaning. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W.J. 1951. Religion among the primitives. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone, L. 1994. Why strict churches are strong. American Journal of Sociology 99 (5): 1180–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann, T. 1967. The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. NewYork: MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. 2000. The Buddhist art of Gandhara: The story of the early school; its birth, growth and decline. New Delhi: Coronet Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H.R., and F.J. Varela. 1980. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. 1st ed. Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J., C. Wood, and C. Caldwell-Harris. 2018. Reflective thought, religious belief, and the social foundations hypothesis. In The new reflectionism in cognitive psychology: Why reason matters, ed. G. Pennycook. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B.G., C. Apicella, Q.D. Atkinson, E. Cohen, R.A. McNamara, A.K. Willard, et al. 2016. Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature 530 (7590): 327–330. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R.A. 1968. Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Ecology, meaning, and religion. North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Ritual and religion in the making of humanity, vol. 110. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. 1995. The construction of social reality. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J.H., G. Fraser, and J.A. Bulbulia. 2017. Charismatic signaling: How religion stabilizes cooperation and entrenches inequality. In The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and religion, ed. T.K. Shackelford and J.R. Liddle, 1–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Y.R. 1991. A general theory of authority. 1st ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.Z. 1982. Imagining religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. 2003. Why aren’t we all hutterites?: Costly signaling theory and religious behavior. Human Nature (Hawthorne, NY) 14 (2): 91–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1000-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. 2017. Religions as complex adaptive systems. In Mental religion: The brain, cognition, and culture, ed. N. Clements. Farmington Hills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. 2019. The building blocks of religious systems: Approaching religion as a complex system. In Evolution, development and complexity: Multiscale evolutionary models of complex adaptive systems, ed. G. Georgiev, J. Smart, C.L.F. Martinez, and M. Price. New York: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., and E.R. Bressler. 2003. Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research 37 (2): 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103037002003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., and J. Kiper. 2014. Why religion is better conceived as a complex system than a norm-enforcing institution. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3): 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13003038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., and J. Kiper. 2017. Sacred versus secular values: Cognitive and evolutionary sciences of religion and religious freedom. In Homo Religiosus? Exploring the roots of religion and religious freedom in human experience, 89–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., and R. Finke. 2000. Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P.E., O.V. Kristel, S.B. Elson, M.C. Green, and J.S. Lerner. 2000. The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (5): 853–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. 1996. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vail, K.E., Z.K. Rothschild, D.R. Weise, S. Solomon, T. Pyszczynski, and J. Greenberg. 2010. A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc 14 (1): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309351165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 2012. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, ed. T. Parsons, A.M. Henderson and Trans. T. Parsons. Mansfield Centre: Martino Fine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, J., and R. Kurzban. 2013. What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evolution and Human Behavior 34 (6): 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willard, A.K., and L. Cingl. 2017. Testing theories of secularization and religious belief in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Evolution and Human Behavior 38: 604–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. 2017. Ritual and the logic of self-regulation: Response to commentators. Religion, Brain & Behavior 7(3): 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1156565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C., and J. Shaver 2018. Religion, evolution, and the basis of institutions: The institutional cognition model of religion. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 2 (2): 1–20. http://doi.org/10.26613/esic.2.2.89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C.P., and K.J. Stockly. 2018. Complexity and possession: Gender and social structure in the variability of shamanic traits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41: E91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17002229.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Connor Wood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wood, C., Sosis, R. (2019). Simulating Religions as Adaptive Systems. In: Diallo, S., Wildman, W., Shults, F., Tolk, A. (eds) Human Simulation: Perspectives, Insights, and Applications. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17090-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics