Abstract
Religious communities exhibit many features of complex adaptive systems (CASs). They are open systems whose global features nonlinearly emerge from the interactions of their components, are complexly internally structured, and must adaptively respond to continual perturbations in their environments. This chapter presents a system dynamics model (SDM) of a generic religious organization represented as a CAS. The simulated community extracts energy from an ecological resource base and expends energy on distinct, mutually exclusive goals: reproduction, energy-seeking, and ritual. Although energy that is spent on ritual cannot be spent on utilitarian objectives, ritual performance increases the perceived legitimacy of the religious system, thereby motivating higher levels of cooperation. Low levels of perceived legitimacy can trigger a switch to a charismatic version of authority. In experiments, we found that many simulated communities maximized their populations by outstripping their resource base shortly before collapsing, in a classic example of boom-and-bust ecological overshoot. However, certain communities showed greater longevity if the Charisma parameter was maximized. We interpret our results to suggest that increasing social flexibility in response to crises of legitimacy may contribute to the resilience of certain types of social, including religious, systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The charismatic Catholic response to shifting social and cultural mores may also be an example of positive feedback driving permanent alterations in the dynamics of religious systems.
References
Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Asad, T. 1993. Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Atran, S. 2002. In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Atran, S., and J. Ginges. 2012. Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science 336 (6083): 855–857. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216902.
Barrett, J.L. 2012. Born believers: The science of childhood religion belief. New York: Free Press.
Baumard, N., and C. Chevallier. 2015. The nature and dynamics of world religions: A life-history approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282 (1818): 20151593. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1593.
Baumeister, R.F., K.D. Vohs, J.L. Aaker, and E.N. Garbinsky. 2013. Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology 8 (6): 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830764.
Bloch, M. 2008. Why religion is nothing special but is central. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363 (1499): 2055–2061. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0007.
Boster, J.S., R.R. Hudson, and S.J.C. Gaulin. 1998. High paternity certainties of Jewish priests. American Anthropologist 100 (4): 967–971. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1998.100.4.967.
Bourguignon, E., ed. 1973. Religion altered states of consciousness and social change. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Bourguignon, E. 1976. Possession. San Francisco: Chandler & Sharp.
Cleary, E.L. 2018. The rise of charismatic Catholicism in Latin America. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Dempster, M., ed. 2011. The globalization of Pentecostalism: A religion made to travel. Eugene: Wipf & Stock Pub.
Doniger, W. 1973. Asceticism and eroticism in the mythology of Åšiva. London: Oxford University Press.
Douglas, M. 1986. How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
———. 2004. Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. Routledge.
Durkheim, É. 2008. The elementary forms of religious life. Trans. C. Cosman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forrester, J.W. 1971. Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Theory and Decision 2 (2): 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148991.
———. 1973. World dynamics. Wright-Allen Press.
Frankl, V.E. 2006. Man’s search for meaning. Boston: Beacon Press.
Goode, W.J. 1951. Religion among the primitives. New York: The Free Press.
Iannaccone, L. 1994. Why strict churches are strong. American Journal of Sociology 99 (5): 1180–1211.
Luckmann, T. 1967. The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. NewYork: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Marshall, J. 2000. The Buddhist art of Gandhara: The story of the early school; its birth, growth and decline. New Delhi: Coronet Books Inc.
Maturana, H.R., and F.J. Varela. 1980. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. 1st ed. Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Morgan, J., C. Wood, and C. Caldwell-Harris. 2018. Reflective thought, religious belief, and the social foundations hypothesis. In The new reflectionism in cognitive psychology: Why reason matters, ed. G. Pennycook. Abingdon: Routledge.
Purzycki, B.G., C. Apicella, Q.D. Atkinson, E. Cohen, R.A. McNamara, A.K. Willard, et al. 2016. Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature 530 (7590): 327–330. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16980.
Rappaport, R.A. 1968. Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people. New Haven: Yale University Press.
———. 1979. Ecology, meaning, and religion. North Atlantic Books.
———. 1999. Ritual and religion in the making of humanity, vol. 110. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J.R. 1995. The construction of social reality. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Shaver, J.H., G. Fraser, and J.A. Bulbulia. 2017. Charismatic signaling: How religion stabilizes cooperation and entrenches inequality. In The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and religion, ed. T.K. Shackelford and J.R. Liddle, 1–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simon, Y.R. 1991. A general theory of authority. 1st ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Smith, J.Z. 1982. Imagining religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Sosis, R. 2003. Why aren’t we all hutterites?: Costly signaling theory and religious behavior. Human Nature (Hawthorne, NY) 14 (2): 91–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1000-6.
Sosis, R. 2017. Religions as complex adaptive systems. In Mental religion: The brain, cognition, and culture, ed. N. Clements. Farmington Hills: Macmillan.
Sosis, R. 2019. The building blocks of religious systems: Approaching religion as a complex system. In Evolution, development and complexity: Multiscale evolutionary models of complex adaptive systems, ed. G. Georgiev, J. Smart, C.L.F. Martinez, and M. Price. New York: Springer International.
Sosis, R., and E.R. Bressler. 2003. Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research 37 (2): 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103037002003.
Sosis, R., and J. Kiper. 2014. Why religion is better conceived as a complex system than a norm-enforcing institution. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3): 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13003038.
Sosis, R., and J. Kiper. 2017. Sacred versus secular values: Cognitive and evolutionary sciences of religion and religious freedom. In Homo Religiosus? Exploring the roots of religion and religious freedom in human experience, 89–119.
Stark, R., and R. Finke. 2000. Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Tetlock, P.E., O.V. Kristel, S.B. Elson, M.C. Green, and J.S. Lerner. 2000. The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (5): 853–870.
Turner, V. 1996. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. New York: Routledge.
Vail, K.E., Z.K. Rothschild, D.R. Weise, S. Solomon, T. Pyszczynski, and J. Greenberg. 2010. A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc 14 (1): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309351165.
Weber, M. 2012. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, ed. T. Parsons, A.M. Henderson and Trans. T. Parsons. Mansfield Centre: Martino Fine Books.
Weeden, J., and R. Kurzban. 2013. What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evolution and Human Behavior 34 (6): 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.006.
Willard, A.K., and L. Cingl. 2017. Testing theories of secularization and religious belief in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Evolution and Human Behavior 38: 604–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.002.
Wood, C. 2017. Ritual and the logic of self-regulation: Response to commentators. Religion, Brain & Behavior 7(3): 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1156565.
Wood, C., and J. Shaver 2018. Religion, evolution, and the basis of institutions: The institutional cognition model of religion. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 2 (2): 1–20. http://doi.org/10.26613/esic.2.2.89.
Wood, C.P., and K.J. Stockly. 2018. Complexity and possession: Gender and social structure in the variability of shamanic traits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41: E91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17002229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wood, C., Sosis, R. (2019). Simulating Religions as Adaptive Systems. In: Diallo, S., Wildman, W., Shults, F., Tolk, A. (eds) Human Simulation: Perspectives, Insights, and Applications. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17090-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17090-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17089-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17090-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)