Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advanced Concurrent Engineering ((ACENG))

  • 3143 Accesses

Abstract

Aluminium alloys are a series of traditional materials applied in aerospace industry. Composite materials have been being used to replace some aluminium alloys in airframe structures. To select a cost-efficient material in aerospace design, a framework for systematic assessment of composites and aluminium is therefore suggested. Through evaluation of 3Ps which represent prices, properties and processing of material, life cycle assessment of aluminium and composite could be made. By comparison of and trade-off the listed baselines of 3Ps, an economic, rational, available and useful material can be logically selected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

6 References

  1. Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe, Strategic Research Agenda, Vol.1, Vol.2, and Executive Summary, October 2004. URL: http://www.acare4europe.org/html/background.shtml [cited 12 September 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Science and Technology Sub-Group, Air Travel — Greener by Design, Mitigating the Environmental Impact of Aviation: Opportunities and Priorities, Royal Aeronautical Society, UK, July 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, J.E., Charter 1: Origins of Composite Materials, in Composite Materials in Aircraft Structures (Ed. D.H. Middleton), Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, UK, 1990, pp.1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Aluminium Institute, The Aluminium Industry’s Sustainable Development Report, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Niu, M.C.Y., Airframe Structural Design: Practical Design Information and Data on Aircraft Structures, Second Edition, Hong Kong Conmilit Press Ltd., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson, G.P., Advanced Composites for Structures, Journal of Aircraft, Vol.3, No.5, 1966, pp.426–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Niu, M.C.Y., Composites Airframe Structures: Practical Design Information and Data, Hong Kong Conmilit Press Ltd., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hinrichsen and Bautista, The Challenge of Reducing both Airframe Weight and Manufacturing Cost, Air and Space Europe, Vol.3, No.3/4, pp.119–121.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Middleton, D.H. (Ed.), Composite materials in Aircraft Structures, Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, UK, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vlot, A., and Gunnink, J.W. (Eds.), Fibre Metal Laminates: An Introduction, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baker, A., Dutton, S., and Kelly, D., Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures (2nd Edition), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Virginia, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ashby, M.F., Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Second Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Department of Transportation, Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization (MMPDS), Replacement Document for MIL-HDBK5, Scientific Report, DOT/FAA/AR-MMPDS-01, Federal Aviation Administration, January 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kalpakjian, S., and Schmid, S.R., Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, Fourth Edition, Pearson Education International, N.J., USA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrlenspiel, K., Kiewert, A., and Lindemann, U., Cost-Efficient Design, Springer, Berlin, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F.C. Campbell, Manufacturing Technology for Aerospace Structural Materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. U.S. Department of Defense, Military Handbooks-MIL-HDBK-17: Composite Materials Handbooks, 2002. Volume 1-Polymer Matrix Composites Guidelines for Characterization of Structural Materials; Volume 2-Polymer Matrix Composites Materials Properties; Volume 3-Polymer Matrix Composites Materials Usage, Design, and Analysis; Volume 4-Metal Matrix Composites; Volume 5. Ceramic matrix composites.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tan, X., Wang, J., Xu, Y., Early, J., Raghunathan, S., Gore, D., and Doherty, J., Costing of Aluminium Process for Life Cycle, 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 2008, AIAA-2008-1123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tan, X. et al. (2008). Cost-Efficient Materials in Aerospace: Composite vs Aluminium. In: Curran, R., Chou, SY., Trappey, A. (eds) Collaborative Product and Service Life Cycle Management for a Sustainable World. Advanced Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-972-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-972-1_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-971-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-972-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics