Skip to main content

Historical Background: Treatments for Hemorrhoids and ODS Prior to Transanal Stapling Techniques

  • Chapter
Transanal Stapling Techniques for Anorectal Prolapse
  • 547 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past decade several innovations in surgical technology have tried to address the painful anodermal wounds and protracted recovery associated with conventional excisional hemorrhoidecto-my. Of these, only the stapled hemorrhoidopexy has achieved recognition as a viable alternative. However, the introduction of stapled hemorrhoidopexy into routine clinical practice was not without controversy. In this chapter, we describe the rationale underlying the technique and discuss the historical background to its eventual acceptance. In addition, we present the evolution of a novel technique, stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). This was inspired by the success of stapled hemorrhoidopexy together with the observation that symptoms of rectal outlet obstruction could be improved by resection of the redundant distal rectum. The concept of internal rectal prolapse as the primary etiology underlying ODS is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abcarian H, Alexander-Williams J, Christiansen J, Johanson JF, Killingback M, Nelson RL, et al.. Benign anorectal disease: definition, characterization and analysis of treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89: S182–S193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 380–386

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gazet JC, Redding W, Rickett JWS. The prevalence of haemorrhoids. Proc R Soc Med 1970; 63: 78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids. NICE technology appraisal guidance 128. Available at www.http://nice.org.uk/TA128

  5. Johanson JF, Sonneberg A. Temporal changes in the occurrence of haemorrhoids in the United States and England. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ. Haemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 477–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Whitehead W. Three hundred cases of haemorrhoids cured by excision. Br Med J 1887; 1: 449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Milligan ETC, Morgan CN, Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet 1937; 2: 1119–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parks AG. The surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1956; 43: 337–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fergusson JA, Heaton JR. Closed haemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1959; 2: 176–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharif HI, Lee L, Alexander-Williams J. Diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991; 6: 217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith LE. Hemorrhoids: a review of current techniques and management. Gastroenterol Clinics North Am 1987; 16: 79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Armstrong DN, Amboze WL, Schertzer ME, et al. Harmonic scalpel vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tan JJK, Seow-Choen F. Prospective, randomized trial comparing diathermy and harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta PJ. Radiofrequency ablation and plication of haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 2003; 7: 45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Milito G, Gargiani M, Cortese F. Randomised trial comparing ligasure haemorrhoidectomy with the diathermy dissection operation. Tech Coloproctol 2002; 6: 171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tan M, Leong AF. Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1729–1730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoesch SB, Knoefel WT, Pichlmeier U, Schulze V, Busch C, Gawad KA. Surgical treatment of piles: randomized study of Parks vs Milligan—Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Vellacott KD, Locke-Edmunds J, Mortensen NJ. Submucosal vs ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy: a comparison of anal sensation, and sphincter manometry and post-operative pain and function. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 948–951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatments: a metanalysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheetham MJ, Philips RK. Evidence-based practice in hemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3: 126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gencosmanoglu R, Sad O, Koc D, et al. Haemorrhoidectomy: open or closed technique? A prospective randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Andrews BT, Layer GT, Jackson BT, et al. Randomized trial comparing diathermy haemorrhoidectomy with the scissors dissection Milligan—Morgan operation. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ibrahim S, Tsang C, Lee YI, et al.. Prospective, randomized trial comparing pain and complications between diathermy and scissors for closed haemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 1418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chia YW, Darzi A, Speakman CT, et al.. CO2 laser haemorrhoidectomy: does it alter anorectal function or decrease pain compared to conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995; 10: 22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T. A novel therapy for internal haemorrhoids: ligation of the haemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 610

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bleijemberg G, Kuipers HC. Treatment of the spastic pelvic floor syndrome with biofeedback. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30: 108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Emmanuel AV, Kamm. Response to behavioural treatment, biofeedback, in constipated patients in association with improved gut transit and autonomic innervation. Gut 2001; 49: 214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A, Wexner S. Biofeedback therapy in the colon and rectal practice. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2003; 28: 47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chang HS, Myung SJ, Yang SK, Kim TH, Yoon IJ, Kwon OR, Hong WS, Kim JH, Min YI. Effect of electrical stimulation in constipated patients with impaired rectal sensation. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003; 18: 433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Block IR. Transrectal repair of rectocele using obliterative suture. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29: 707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sarles JC, Anaud A, Seleznief I, Olivier S. Endorectal repair of rectocele. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989; 4: 167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Khubchandani IT, Clancy IP, Rosen L, Richter RD, Stasik IJ. Endorectal repair of rectocele revisited. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. D'Hoore, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1500–1505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. D'Hoore, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 2006 Oct 9; 20: 1919–1923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Williams NS, Giordano P, Dvorkin LS, Huang A, Hetzer FH, Scott SM. External Pelvic Rectal Suspension (The Express Procedure) for full-thickness rectal prolapse: evolution of a new technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 307–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975; 62: 542–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Haas PA, Fox TA Jr, Haas GP. The pathogenesis of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27: 442–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brondel H, Gondran M. Facteurs prédisposants liés à l'érédité et à la profession dans la maladie hémorrhoidaire. Archives Francaises des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestive 1976; 65: 541–550

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jacobs DM, Burbrick MP, Onstad GR, Hitchcock CR. The relationship of hemorrhoids to portal hypertension. Dis Colon Rectum 1980; 23: 567–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Keane RM, Britton DC. Massive bleeding from rectal varices following repeated injection sclerotherapy of oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hosking SW, Smart HL, Johnson AG, Triger DR. Anorectal varices, haemorrhoids, and portal hypertension. Lancet 1989; 1: 349–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stelzner F Hemorrhoids and other diseases of the corpus cavernosum recti and the anal canal. Deutsch Med Wochenschr 1963; 88: 177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mentha J, Neiger A, Mangold R. Entzündugen des Anus und Hämorrhoiden. Praxis 1961; 50: 751–757

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Read MG, Read NW, Haynes WG, Donnelly TC, Johnson AG. A prospective study of the effect of haemorrhoidetomy on sphincter function and faecal continence. Br J Surg 1982; 69: 396–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Denis J. Étude numérique de quelque facteurs éthiopathogéniques des troubles hémorrhoidaires de l'adulte. Archives Francaises des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestive 1976; 65: 529–536

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Haas PA, Haas GP, Schmaltz S, Fox TA Jr. The prevalence of haemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1983; 26: 435–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Soullard J, Richir C, Madesclaire G. Signification des altérations vasculaires de la muqueuse anale en pathologie hémorrhoidaire. Presse Med 1959; 67: 179–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hénry MM, Swàsh M. Physiology of faecal continence and defecation. Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. London: Butterworths, 1985; 42–61

    Google Scholar 

  51. Capomagi A, Mannetta V, Balestrieri A. Circular hemorrhoidectomy using a stapler: the gold standard' for the treatment of hemorrhoids? Preliminary data regarding 206 consecutive patients. It J Coloproct 1999; 2: 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  52. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Chiumarulo C, Palasciano N. Treatment of external anal mucosal prolapse with circular stapler: an easy and effective new surgical technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1102–1105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Beattie GC, Lam JPH, Loudon MA. A prospective evaluation of the introduction of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of hemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2000; 2: 137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Beattie GC, Loudon MA. Follow-up confirms sustained benefit of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of prolapsing hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 850–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 779–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mehigan BJ, Monson JRT, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan—Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 782–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom P-O, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 356: 730–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Beattie GC, Loudon MA. Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 356: 2189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kam MH, Mathur P, Peng XH, et al.. Correlation of histology with anorectal function following stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1437–1441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355: 810 (letter)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Maw A, Kong-Weng E, Seow-Choen F. Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 826–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Herold A, Kirsch JJ. Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 356: 2187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wong L-Y, Jiang J-K, Shih-Ching C, Lin J-K. Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 116–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 268–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Cheetham MJ, Cohen CRG, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS. A randomized controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow up. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 491–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Seow-Choen F Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: pain or gain. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lehur PA. Focus-stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Presentation. Osp Ital Chir 2003; 9: 325

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 878–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G, Binda G, Pescatori M. Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 2003; 7: 148–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lenisa, L.L., Landolfi, V. (2009). Historical Background: Treatments for Hemorrhoids and ODS Prior to Transanal Stapling Techniques. In: Jayne, D., Stuto, A. (eds) Transanal Stapling Techniques for Anorectal Prolapse. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-905-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-905-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-904-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-905-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics