Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized trial comparing diathermy hemorrhoidectomy with the scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan operation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Twenty consecutive patients (12 male and 8 female) with second-degree, third-degree, or thrombosed hemorrhoids were randomly allocated to undergo either diathermy hemorrhoidectomy (n=10) or a scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (n=10). No significant difference was found in the postoperative pain score between the groups. On a scale of 0 to 10, the mean daily pain score in the diathermy group was 4.0, and it was 4.1 in the scissor dissection group. Nor was there any significant difference in the length of inpatient stay (diathermy group, 3.5 days; scissor dissection group, 4.0 days) or in the time between the operation and the first bowel action (diathermy group, 2.0 days; scissor dissection group, 30 days). Diathermy hemorrhoidectomy has no significant advantage over the scissor dissection classical Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milligan ET, Morgan CN, Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet 1937;2:1119–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parks AG. The surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1956;43:337–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander-Williams J. The management of piles. BMJ 1982;285:1137–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharif H, Lee L, Alexander-Williams J. How I do it: diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:217–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lentini J, Leveroni J, Taure C. Twenty-five years experience with the high frequency transistorised loop with special reference to haemorrhoidectomy without suture. Coloproctology 1990;4:239–49.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis MI, de la Cruz T, Gazzaniga DA, Ball TL. Cryosurgical hemorrhoidectomy: preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 1969;12:371–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hawley PR. Haemorrhoids. In: Taylor, ed. Recent advances in surgery no. 8. Edinburgh, London: Churchill Livingstone, 1973:235–55.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis MI. Cryosurgical hemorrhoidectomy: a followup report. Dis Colon Rectum 1972;15:128–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffith CDM, Morris DL, Ellis I, Wherry DC, Hardcastle JD. Out-patient treatment of haemorrhoids with bipolar diathermy coagulation. Br J Surg 1987;74:827.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dennison A, Whiston R, Rooney S, Chatterton R, Wherry D, Morris D. A randomized comparison of infrared photocoagulation with bipolar diathermy for the outpatient treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:32–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Andrews, B.T., Layer, G.T., Jackson, B.T. et al. Randomized trial comparing diathermy hemorrhoidectomy with the scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan operation. Dis Colon Rectum 36, 580–583 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049865

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049865

Key words

Navigation