Skip to main content

An Ethical Behavior Interpretation of Optimal Control

  • Chapter
Optimal Control and Differential Games

Part of the book series: Advances in Computational Management Science ((AICM,volume 5))

Abstract

The study of ethical behavior is usually done in a static context, ignoring the lagging consequences of acts. A dynamic model of ethical behavior is developed in this paper, where it is shown that unless some religious beliefs or social considerations are taken into account by the individual, his/her actions will only become less ethical over time. The model elicits many other characteristics of ethical behavior, such as the role of selfesteem and reputation and the importance given to future consequences.

The idea of this paper has initially been discussed in 1998 with Tuomas Raivio and Gerald Karner at the Systems Analysis Laboratory of the Helsinki University of Technology (Finland). I wish to thank Tuomas Raivio and Georges Zaccour for their comments on the first draft. Although lowe much to them, the responsibility of any error remains mine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander, R.D. (1987).The Biology of Moral Systems. Hawthrone, Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aristotle. (1955)Nicomachean Ethics. Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bentham, J. (1789). “An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation” in Burns J. and Hart L. (eds) (1970). London, Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kamien, M., and Schwartz, N.L. (1981).Dynamic Optimization: the Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kant, I. (1788).Critique of Pratical Reason. Beck L.W. (ed.) (1949). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kurtines, W.M., and Gewirtz, J.L. (eds) (1984).Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, T.M. (1991). “Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Continent Model”.Academy of Mangement Review. Vol. 16 (2) 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jorgensen, S., Sigué, S.P., and Zaccour, G. (2000). “Cooperative Advertising in a Dynamic Vertical Channel”.Journal of Retailing. Vol. 76(Winter) 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Léonard, D., and van Long, N. (1992).Optimal Control Theory and Static Optimization in Economics. Cambirdge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Lickona, T. (ed.) (1976).Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mill, J.S. (1863).Utilitarianism. Warnock M (ed.) (1962). London, Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rinaldi, S. (1998). “Love Dynamics: The Case of Linear Couples”.Applied Mathematics and Computation. Vol. 95 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rotemberg, J.J. (1994). “Human Relations in the Workplace”.Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 102 (4) 684–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sengupta, J., and Fanchon, P. (1997).Control Theory Methods in Economics. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Simpson, E.L. (1976). “A Holistic Approach to Moral Development and Behavior”. In Lickona (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tamari, M. (1996). “Determining the Criteria of Ethical Behavior”. In Gasparski, W.-W., Ryan, L.-V. (eds)Human action in business: Praxiological and ethical dimensions. Praxiology: The International Annual of Practical Philosophy and Methodology. Vol. 5, 197–211. New Brunswick, N.J. and London, Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tri-Council Policy Statement (Medical Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering, and Social Sciences and Humanities Councils of Canada) (1998).Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa, Public Works and Government Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pineau, PO. (2002). An Ethical Behavior Interpretation of Optimal Control. In: Zaccour, G. (eds) Optimal Control and Differential Games. Advances in Computational Management Science, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1047-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1047-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5368-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1047-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics