Abstract
In real markets of logistics services, actors make independent decisions to pursue their own objectives, neglecting the need for maximizing performance of the market as a whole. The aim of this chapter is to assess the inefficiency of such logistics markets and define policies to improve system-wide performance, taking into account each actor’s behavior. A simulation model of a logistics marketplace is thus defined, wherein the transportation needs of a number of shippers have to be matched with the capacities of several carriers. The model is used to assess the players’ behavior and system performance in a decentralized logistics market. The analysis shows the extent to which certain features of the market affect inefficiency, stressing the room for improvement. Based on simulation results, several recommendations are given, aimed at influencing the actors’ autonomous decision making. We discuss how the recommendations’ efficacy is impacted by behavioral issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
S. Ağralı, B. Tan, F. Karaesmen, Modeling and analysis of an auction-based logistics market. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191, 272–294 (2008)
D. Andersson, A. Norrman, Procurement of logistics services—a minutes work or a multi-year project. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 8, 3–14 (2002)
B.K. Bahinipati, A. Kanda, S.G. Deshmukh, Coordinated supply management: review, insights, and limitations. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 12(6), 407–422 (2009)
J.R. Brown, C.S. Dev, D.J. Lee, Managing marketing channel opportunism: The efficacy of alternative governance mechanisms. J. Mark. 64(2), 51–65 (2000)
G.P. Cachon, P.H. Zipkin, Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain. Manage. Sci. 45(7), 936–953 (1999)
M.C. Cooper, D.M. Lambert, J.D. Pagh, Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 8(2), 1–14 (1997)
C.J. Corbett, C.S. Tang, Designing supply contracts: contract type and information asymmetry, in Quantitative models for supply chain management, ed. by S. Tayur, R. Ganeshan, M. Magazine (Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 1999), pp. 269–297
L.L. Cummings, P. Bromiley, The organizational trust inventory (OTI): development and validation, in Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, ed. by R.M. Kramer, T. Tyler (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1996), pp. 302–330
O. Ergun, G. Kuyzu, M. Salvelsbergh, Reducing truckload transportation costs through collaboration. Transportation Science 41(2), 206–221 (2007)
J.A. Fitzsimmons, J. Noh, E. Thies, Purchasing business services. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 13(4–5), 370–380 (1998)
M.T. Frohlich, R. Westbrook, Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. J. Oper. Manag. 19, 185–210 (2001)
I. Giannoccaro, R. Moramarco, P. Pontrandolfo, E-procurement of logistics services: the impact of the service attributes on the exchange mechanism. In: 20 th International Conference on Production Research, Shanghai, 2–6 August 2009
J. Gorick, Running on empty? Logist. Transp. Focus 8(10), 25–26 (2006)
H. Lee, S. Whang, Decentralized multi-echelon supply chains: incentives and information. Manage. Sci. 45(5), 633–639 (1999)
G.N. Nyaga, J.M. Whipple, D.F. Lynch, Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? J. Oper. Manag. 28(2), 101–114 (2010)
D.M. Rousseau, S.B. Sitkin, R.S. Burt, C. Camerer, Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(7), 393–404 (1998)
A. Rubinstein, Modeling bounded rationality (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998)
T. Schoenherr, V.A. Mabert, The use of bundling in B2B online reverse auctions. J. Oper. Manag. 26(1), 81–95 (2008)
H.E. Simon, Models of bounded rationality (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982)
X. Su, Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 10(4), 566–589 (2008)
C.S. Tang, Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 103(2), 451–488 (2006)
A.A. Tsay, S. Nahmias, N. Agrawal, Modeling supply chain contracts: a review, in Quantitative models for supply chain management, ed. by S. Tayur, R. Ganeshan, M. Magazine (Kluwer Academic Publisher, Norwell, 1999), pp. 299–336
S.K. Vickery, J. Jayaram, C. Drodge, R. Calantone, The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. J. Oper. Manag. 21(5), 523–539 (2003)
O.E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (The Free Press, New York, 1985)
J. Yao, Decision optimization analysis on supply chain resource integration in fourth party logistics. J. Manuf. Syst. 29(4), 121–129 (2010)
A. Zaheer, B. McEvily, V. Perrone, Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. 9(2), 141–159 (1998)
V.A. Zeithaml, A. Parasuraman, L.L. Berry, Problems and strategies in services marketing. J. Mark. 49(2), 33–46 (1985)
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by Regione Puglia (APQ PS025) and the Engineering Faculty in Taranto of the Politecnico di Bari.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bellantuono, N., Kersten, G.E., Pontrandolfo, P. (2013). Markets of Logistics Services: The Role of Actors’ Behavior to Enhance Performance. In: Giannoccaro, I. (eds) Behavioral Issues in Operations Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4878-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4878-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4877-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4878-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)