Skip to main content

Abstract

In this review, we summarize model-based research on contracts in the supply chain setting and provide a taxonomy for work in this area. During our discussions it became clear that the field has developed in many directions at once. Furthermore, as we surveyed the Uterature, it was not obvious what constitutes a contract in this context. While the nomenclature “supply chain management” is relatively new, many of the problems that are addressed are not. In particular, mathematical models for optimizing inventory control have a long history as a significant part of the mainstream of operations research and operations management. Inventory modeling, per se, dates to the early part of the century and the ideas of a Westinghouse engineer named Ford Harris (1915). A natural issue to address first is what is meant by supply chain management (SCM) research and how it relates to the vast body of work constituting classical inventory theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agrawal, N. and M.A. Cohen, “Optimal Material Control in an Assembly Environment with Component Commonality,” Working Paper, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, N., S.A. Smith, and A.A. Tsay, “Multi-Vendor Sourcing in a Retail Supply Chain,” Working Paper, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, N. and A.A. Tsay, “The Impact of Intrafirm Performance Incentives on Supply Chain Contracts,” Working Paper, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anupindi, R. and R. Akella, “An Inventory Model with Commitments,” Working Paper, Northwestern University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anupindi, R. and Y. Bassok, “Analysis of Supply Contracts with Total Minimum Commitment and Flexibility,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium in Logistics, University of Nottingham, U.K., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anupindi, R. and Y. Bassok, “Approximations for Multiproduct Contracts with Stochastic Demands and Business Volume Discounts: Single Supplier Case,” Working Paper, Northwestern University, 1997. To appear in IIE Transactions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K.R., “Safety Stocks and Component Commonality,” Journal of Operations Management, 6, 1 (1985), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannerjee, A., “A Joint Economic-Lot-Size Model for Purchaser and Vendor,” Decision Science, 17 (1986), 292–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Schuster, D., Y. Bassok, and R. Anupindi, “The Effect of Delivery Lead Time in a Two-Stage Decentralized System,” Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Schuster, D., Y. Bassok, and R. Anupindi, “Supply Contracts with Options: Flexibility, Information and Coordination,” Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassok, Y. and R. Anupindi, “Analysis of Supply Contracts with Forecasts and Flexibility,” Working Paper, Northwestern University, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassok, Y. and R. Anupindi, “Analysis of Supply Contracts with Total Minimum Commitment,” IIE Transactions, 29, 5 (1997a), 373–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassok, Y. and R. Anupindi, “Analysis of Supply Contracts with Commitments and Flexibility,” Working Paper, Northwestern University, 1997b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessler, S.A. and A.F. Veinott, “Optimal Policy for a Dynamic Multi-Echelon Inventory Model,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 13, 4 (1966), 355–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, B.F. and T.R. Lewis, “Optimal Retail Contracts with Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard,” Rand Journal of Economics, 25 (1994), 284–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G.P. and M.A. Lariviere, “Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance,” Working Paper, The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G.P. and M.A. Lariviere, “Contracting to Assure Supply or What Did the Supplier Know and When Did He Know It?”, Working Paper, The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, 1997a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G.P. and M.A. Lariviere, “Capacity Allocation Using Past Sales: When to Turn-and-Earn,” Working Paper, The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, 1997b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F., “Decentralized Supply Chains Subject to Information Delays,” Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.J, “An Informal Survey of Multi-Echelon Inventory Theory,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 19 (1972), 621–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.J. and Scarf, H., “Optimal Policies for a Multiechelon Inventory Problem,” Management Science, 6 (1960), 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.A and N. Agrawal, “An Analytical Comparison of Long and Short Term Contracts,” Working Paper, Department of OPIM, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.A., P.R. Kleindorfer, and H.L. Lee, “Service Constrained (s,S) Inventory Systems with Priority Demand Classes and Lost Sales,” Management Science, 34, 4 (1988), 482–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, C.J. and X. de Groote, “Integrated Supply-Chain Lot Sizing Under Asymmetric Information,” Working Paper, UCLA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, K.H., “A Delivery-Lag Inventory Model With Emergency,” in H.E. Scarf, D.M. Gilford and M.W. Shelly (Eds.), Multistage Inventory Models and Techniques, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K., “Quality and Quantity Competition,” Review of Economic Studies, 46 (1979), 587–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, K.L, “Supply Contracts for Fashion Goods: Optimizing Channel Profit,” Working Paper, Department of OPIM, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, H. and S.M. Gilbert, “Note: The Role of Returns Policies in Pricing and Inventory Decisions for Catalogue Goods,”Management Science, 44, 2 (1998), 276–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppen, G.D., “Effects of Centralization on Expected Costs in a Multi-Location Newsboy Problem,” Management Science, 25, 5 (1979), 498–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppen, G.D. and A.V. Iyer, “Backup Agreements in Fashion Buying-The Value of Upstream Flexibility,” Management Science, 43 (1997), 1469–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppen, G.D. and L. Schrage, “Centralized Ordering Policies in a Multi-Warehouse System with Lead Times and Random Demand,” In L.B. Schwarz, (Ed.), Multi-Level Production/Inventory Control Systems: Theory and Practice, Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1981, 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federgruen, A., “Centralized Planning Models for Multi-Echelon Inventory Systems Under Uncertainty,” in S.C. Graves, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan and P.H. Zipkin (Eds.), Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol 4 (Logistics of Production and Inventory), Elsevier Science Publishing Company B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993, 133–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, Y., “Optimal Policies for the Inventory Problem with Negotiable Lead-time,” Management Science, 10 (1964), 690–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak, Y. and M. Henig, “Component Commonality in Assemble-To-Order Systems: Models and Properties,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 36 (1989), 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S.M. and Z.K. Weng, “Incentive Effects Favor Non-Consolidating Queues in a Service System: The Principal-Agent Perspective,” Working Paper, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grout, J.R. and D.P. Christy, “An Inventory Model of Incentives for On-Time Delivery in Just-in-Time Purchasing Contracts,” Naval Research Logistics, 40 (1993), 863–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, A.Y., “Supply Contract for a Short-Life-Cycle Product with Demand Uncertainty and Asymmetric Cost Information,” Working Paper, Yale School of Management, 1997a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, A.Y., “Inventory Rationing in a Make-to-Stock Production System with Several Demand Classes and Lost Sales,” Management Science, 43, 8 (1997b), 1093–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J.H., “Barilla SpA (A),” HBS Case 9–694–046, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, W.H., H.L. Lee, and L. Zhang, “Optimal Ordering for an Inventory System with Dual Lead Times,” Working Paper, Department of Industrial Engineering-Engineering Management, Stanford University, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F.W., Operations And Cost (Factory Management Series), Shaw, Chicago, 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, A. and M.E. Bergen, “Quick Response in Manufacturer-Retailer Channels,” Management Science, 43, 4 (1997), 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.L., “Stock Allocation in a Two-Echelon Distribution System or ‘What to Do Until Your Ship Comes In’,” Management Science, 34, 7 (1988), 880–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeuland, A.P. and S.M. Shugan, “Managing Channel Profits,” Marketing Science, 2 (1983), 239–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, H. and E. A. Silver, “Overview of a Stock Allocation Model for a Two-Echelon Push System Having Identical Units at the Lower Echelon,” In S. Axsater, C. Schneeweiss and E.A. Silver, (Eds.), Multi-Stage Production Planning and Inventory Control: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 266, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981, 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, J.M. and F.M. Gryna, Juran’s Quality Control Handbook, 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E., “The Right to Return,” Journal of Law and Economics, 39 (1996), 329–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.L., “Vertical Contractual Relations,” in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization: Volume I, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., New York, NY, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., P.S. Giridharan, and R. Akella, “Control Structures, Performance and Incentives: An Operations Management Perspective,” Working Paper, Department of Engineering Economic Systems, Stanford University, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., “The Power of Trust in Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships,” Harvard Business Review, 74 (1996), 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, D.G. and E.L. Porteus, “Dynamic Lead Time Management,” Research Paper #1409, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L., “Effective Inventory and Service Management Through Product and Process Redesign,” Operations Research, 44 (1996), 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L., C. Billington, and B. Carter, “Hewlett-Packard Gains Control of Inventory and Service Through Design for Localization,” Interfaces, 23 (1993), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L., V. Padmanabhan, and S. Whang, “Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect,” Management Science, 43 (1997), 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L. and M.J. Rosenblatt, “A Generalized Quantity Discount Pricing Model to Increase Supplier’s Profits,” Management Science, 30 (1986), 1179–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L. and S. Whang, “Decentralized Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: Incentives and Information,” Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. and P. Kouvelis, “Flexible and Risk-Sharing Supply Contracts Under Price Uncertainty,” Working Paper, Olin School of Business, Washington University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J.M. and M.J. Rosenblatt, “Two-Period Supply Contracts: Order Adjustments and Penalties,” Working Paper, Olin School of Business, Washington University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moinzadeh, K. and C. Ingene, “An Inventory Model of Immediate and Delayed Delivery,” Management Science, 39, 5 (1993), 536–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moinzadeh, K. and S. Nahmias, “Adjustment Strategies for a Fixed Delivery Contract,” Working Paper, University of Washington, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J.P., “A Quantitative Discount Pricing Model to Increase Vendor Profits,” Management Science, 30 (1984), 720–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy, K.S., “Managing Channel Profits: Comment,” Marketing Science, 6, 4 (1987), 375–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahmias, S., Production and Operations Analysis, Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahmias, S. and W.S. Demmy, “Operating Characteristics of an Inventory System with Rationing,” Management Science, 27 (1981), 1236–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, V.G. and A. Raman, “Assignment of Stocking Decision Rights under Incomplete Contracting,” Working Paper, Harvard Business School, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternack, B.A., “Optimal Pricing and Returns Policies for Perishable Commodities,” Marketing Science, 4 (1985), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porteus, E.L., “Stochastic Inventory Theory,” in D.P. Heyman and M.J. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science, Volume 2 (Stochastic Models), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1990, 605–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porteus, E.L. and S. Whang, “On Manufacturing/Marketing Incentives,” Management Science, 37, 9 (1991), 1166–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyniers, D.J. and CS. Tapiero, “The Delivery and Control of Quality in Supplier-Producer Contracts,” Management Science, 41, 10 (1995), 1581–1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, M.J. and H.L. Lee, “Improving Profitability with Quantity Discounts under Fixed Demand,” IIE Transactions, 17, 4 (1985), 388–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosling, K., “Optimal Inventory Policies for Assembly Systems Under Random Demands,” Operations Research, 37 (1989), 565–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, L.B., Multi-Level Production/Inventory Control Systems: Theory and Practice, North-Holland Publishing Company, New York, NY, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A.M., “Monopoly, Quality, and Regulation,” Bell Journal of Economics, 6 (1975), 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, J.J, “Vertical Restraints and Antitrust Policy,” Journal of Political Economy, 58 (1950), 347–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbird, S.A., “The Effect of Acceptance Sampling and Risk Aversion on the Quality Delivered by Suppliers,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, 3 (1994), 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbird, S.A., “Acceptance Sampling, Imperfect Production, and the Optimally of Zero Defects,” Naval Research Logistics, 44 (1997a), 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbird, S.A., “Supply Chain Management, Joint Cost Optimization, and Quality,” Working Paper, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, 1997b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagaras, G. and H.L. Lee, “Economic Models for Vendor Evaluation with Quality Cost Analysis,” Management Science, 42, 11 (1996), 1531–1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiróle, J., The Theory of Industrial Organization, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A.A, “The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives,” Working Paper, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A.A. and W.S. Lovejoy, “Quantity Flexibility Contracts and Supply Chain Performance,” Working Paper, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, 1998. To appear in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verity, J.W., “Clearing the Cobwebs from the Stockroom,” Business Week, October 21, 1996, p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng, Z.K., “Channel Coordination and Quantity Discounts,” Management Science, 41 (1995), 1509–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng, Z.K., “Pricing and Ordering Strategies in Manufacturing and Distribution Alliances,” IIE Transactions, 29 (1997a), 681–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng, Z.K., “Coordination Strategies for Aligning Divergent Interests in a Manufacturing and Distribution Supply Chain,” Working Paper, School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1997b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng, Z.K., “A Decision Framework for the Manufacturer to Coordinate with the Buyer,” Working Paper, School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1997c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whang, S., “Coordination in Operations: A Taxonomy,” Journal of Operations Management, 12 (1995), 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yano, C.A. and H.L. Lee, “Lot Sizing with Random Yields: A Review,” Operations Research, 43, 2 (1995), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tsay, A.A., Nahmias, S., Agrawal, N. (1999). Modeling Supply Chain Contracts: A Review. In: Tayur, S., Ganeshan, R., Magazine, M. (eds) Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 17. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4949-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4949-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7246-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4949-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics