Skip to main content

An Introduction to Community Operational Research

  • Chapter
Community Operational Research

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

Abstract

It is common for introductory chapters of edited books to start by defining their subject matter. However, in this case, it is really the task of the whole book, not this paragraph, to communicate the meaning of Community Operational Research (‘Community OR’ for short). We say this because we believe that healthy research networks involve a diversity of participants with both common and divergent interests, and the Community OR network is no exception. For us to specify right at the start of this book what Community OR is all about would almost certainly mean marginalising other people’s concerns. We therefore prefer to portray Community OR, not as a finite set of ideas or activities, but as a label used by a variety of people engaged in debate and on-going learning about their own and other people’s community development practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R.L. (1970). A black ghetto’s research on a university. Operations Research, 18, 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R.L. (1979a). The future of operational research is past. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R.L. (1979b). Resurrecting the future of operational research. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30, 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R.L. (1981). Creating the Corporate Future. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1966). Decision and Control: The Meaning of Operational Research and Management Cybernetics. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanov, A.A. (1913–1917). Bogdanov’s Tektology. 1996 edn. Dudley, P. (ed.). Centre for Systems Studies Press, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1956). General systems theory-The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2, 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, K. (1995). In at the Deep End: MSc Student Projects in Community Operational Research. Community Operational Research Unit, Barnsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter. HarperCollins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P., Jackson, M.C., Jackson, N.V., and Keys, P. (1987). Announcing a ‘Centre for Community Operational Research’ at Hull University. Dragon, 2(2), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1983). Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Prentice Hall, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. Intermediate Technology Development Group, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (2002). Participatory Workshops: A Sourcebook of 21 Sets of Ideas and Activities. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36, 757–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1968a). Challenge to Reason. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1968b). The Systems Approach. Dell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science, 17, B37–B53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1979). The Systems Approach and its Enemies. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1987). Systems profile: Discoveries in an exploration into systems think-ing. Systems Research, 4, 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, A.M.H. and Radcliffe, N.J. (1996). Sustainability: A Systems Approach. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba, J.R. and Midgley, G. (2003). Addressing organizational and societal concerns: An application of critical systems thinking to information systems planning in Colombia. In: Critical Reflections on Information Systems: A Systemic Approach. Cano, J.J. (ed.). Idea Group, Hershey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1980). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Massumi, B. (trans.), 1988 edn. Athlone, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt, P.K. (1994). Problem contexts-A consultant’s perspective. Systems Practice, 7, 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzidonu, C.K. and Foster, EG. (1993). Prolegomena to operational research modelling of the global environment development problems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1988). Cognitive mapping: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 36, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1989). Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis (SODA). In: Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Rosenhead, J. (ed.). Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. (1998). Strategy Making: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. (1993). Characteristics of socio-technical systems. In: The Social Engagement of Social Science, vol. II: The Socio-Technical Perspective. Trist, E. and Murray, H. (eds.). University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F.E. and Thorsrud, E. (1969). Form and Content in Industrial Democracy. Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F.E. and Thorsrud, E. (1976). Democracy at Work. Nijhoff, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F.E. and Trist, E.L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery F.E. and Trist E.L. (1981). Sociotechnical systems. In: Systems Behaviour, 3rd edn. Open Systems Group (ed.). Harper and Row, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, C, Køppe, S., and Stjernfelt, F. (1997). Explaining emergence: Towards an ontology of levels. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28, 83–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fildes, R. and Ranyard, J.C. (1997). Success and survival of operational research groups-A review. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48, 336–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L. (1999). Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning Within the Unknowable. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L. and Jackson, M.C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J. (1998). Managing development projects and programmes: Fresh perspectives towards an action research agenda. University of Lincolnshire & Humberside Working Paper #21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J. and Hickling, A. (1997). Planning Under Pressure, 2nd edn. Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R.L. (1991a). The roots of reductionism: A counter-ontoepistemology for a systems approach. Systems Practice, 4, 419–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R.L. (1991b). The self-referential structure of an everyday living situation: A phenomenological ontology for interpretive systemology. Systems Practice, 4, 449–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R.L. (1991c). Truth and openness: An epistemology for interpretive systemol-ogy. Systems Practice, 4, 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R.L., Bonucci, M., and L¨®pez-Garay, H. (1991). An interpretive-systemic study of the University of Los Andes. Systems Practice, 4, 507–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A.J. and Jackson, M.C. (1992a). Evaluating organizations: A systems and contin-gency approach. Systems Practice, 5, 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A.J. and Jackson, M.C. (1992b). Evaluation methodologies: A system for use. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W.J. (1990). Critical systems thinking and LST: How ‘liberating’ are contemporary critical and liberating systems approaches? In: Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, vol I: Systems Design. Banathy, B.H. and Banathy, B.A. (eds.). International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W.J. (1992). Critical systems thinking and pluralism: A new constellation. PhD Thesis, City University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W.J. and Midgley, G. (2000). Planning for disaster: Developing a multi-agency counselling service. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 278–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, WD. and Watt, K.E.F. (1992). Viability and sustainability of civilizations, corpo-rations, institutions and environmental systems. Systems Research, 9, 3–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1976). Communication and the Evolution of Society. English edn., 1979. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984a). The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. I: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984b). The Theory of Communicative Action, vol II: The Critique of Functionalist Reason. Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, J. (2000). A framework of value-focused systems thinking. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13, 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D.J. (1985). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, L.U. and Tuttle, D.B. (1997). Dynamic management of the environmental enterprise: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 10, 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C. (1987a). Community operational research: Purposes, theory and practice. Dragon, 2(2), 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C. (1987b). New directions in management science. In: New Directions in Management Science. Jackson, M.C. and Keys, P. (eds). Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C. (1987c). Present positions and future prospects in management science. Omega, 15, 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C. (1991). Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C. and Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 473–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G.C. (1993). OR practice, systems methodologies, and the need to do better. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 845–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H.G. (1992). Early OR in the steel company of Wales. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 563–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. and Eden, C. (1981). O.R. in the community. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 32, 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs, vol. I: A Theory of Personality. W.W Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, P. (1991). Operational Research and Systems: The Systemic Nature of Operational Research. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • L¨®pez-Garay, H. (1991). An interpretive-systemic study of the Regional Planning Corporation of Los Andes in Venezuela. Systems Practice, 4, 491–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makowski, M. (2000). Knowledge integration in model-based decision support. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium on Knowledge and Systems Sciences: Challenges to Complexity (KSS 2000). Ishikawa, Japan, September 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, G. (1991). Methodology choice in a coercive context. Systems Practice, 4, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchai, J.H. (1975). On the concept of a system. Philosophy of Science, 42, 448–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mar Molinero, C. (1992). Operational research: From war to community. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 26, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, N. (1987). The community operational research (OR) network. Dragon, 2(2), 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R.O. and Mitroff, I.I. (1981). Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1990). Creative methodology design. Systemist, 12, 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1992). The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking. Systems Practice, 5, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1996). What is this thing called critical systems thinking? In: Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice. Flood, R.L. and Romm, N.R.A. (eds.). Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1997). Developing the methodology of TSI: From the oblique use of methods to creative design. Systems Practice, 10, 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic Intervention Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice. Kluwer/Plenum, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2001). Rethinking the unity of science. International Journal of General Systems, 30, 379–09.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., Munlo, I., and Brown, M. (1998). The theory and practice of boundary critique: Developing housing services for older people. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 467–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. and Ochoa-Arias, A.E. (1999). Visions of community for community OR. Omega, 27, 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. and Reynolds, M. (2001). Operational Research and Environmental Management: A New Agenda. Operational Research Society, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.G. (1965). Living systems: Basic concepts. Behavioral Science, 10, 193–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.G. (1978). Living Systems. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J.C. (1992a). Recent developments in critical management science. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J.C. (1992b). Technical, practical and critical OR-Past, present and future? In: Critical Management Studies. Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (eds.). Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J.C. (1993). The system of systems methodologies-A reply to Schecter. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 206–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J.C. (1997). Towards critical pluralism. In: Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Mingers, J. and Gill, A. (eds.). Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organisation. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • M’Pherson, P.K. (1974). A perspective on systems science and systems philosophy. Futures, 6, 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamori, Y. (2000). Knowledge management system toward sustainable society. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium on Knowledge and Systems Sciences: Challenges to Complexity (KSS 2000). Ishikawa, Japan, September 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noad, N. and King, L. (1977). Area co-ordination: Some examples compared. Linkage, 2, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Arias, A.E. (1996). An interpretive-systemic study of community organizations in Venezuela. PhD Thesis, University of Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Arias, A.E. (1998). An interpretive-systemic framework for the study of community organizations. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11, 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Arias, A.E. (2000). Community organizations in Venezuela: Toward the disintegra-tion of the modern state and the emergence of a ‘community organized’ society? Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13, 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, R. (1996). New methods for old. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 1317–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, R. and Mingers, J. (1991). Community operational research: Its context and its future. Omega, 19, 577–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, J. (2000). City Region 2020: Integrated Planning for a Sustainable Environment. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2000). The Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, C. (1994). Community OR-Five years of organised activities and beyond. International Transactions in Operational Research, 1, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, C., Taket, A., and Bryant, J. (eds.) (1994). Community Works: 26 Case Studies Showing Community Operational Research in Action. Pavic Press, Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1986). Custom and practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 37, 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1987). From management science to workers’ science. In: New Directions in Management Science. Jackson, M.C. and Keys, P. (eds.). Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1993). Enabling analysis: Across the developmental divide. Systems Practice, 6, 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthe, S.N. (1989). Self-organization of/in hierarchically structured systems. Systems Research, 6, 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stansfield, R.G. (1981). Operational research: Dying to live? Paper presented (and text of talk distributed) at the Operational Research Society Annual Conference held at the University of Sussex, September 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straussfogel, D. and Becker, M.L. (1996). An evolutionary systems approach to policy inter-vention for achieving ecologically sustainable societies. Systems Practice, 9, 441–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, D.C. (1995). The enterprise design framework meets the system of systems method-ologies. Systems Practice, 8, 409–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A. (2002). Facilitation: Some contributions to theorising the practice of operational research. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A. and White, L. (1994). Doing community operational research with multicultural groups. Omega, 22, 579–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A. and White, L. (2000). Partnership and Participation: Decision-Making in the Multi- Agency Setting. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thunhurst, C. and Ritchie, C. (1992). Housing in the Dearne Valley: Doing community OR with the Thurnscoe Tenants Housing Cooperative. Part 2-An evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 677–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thunhurst, C, Ritchie, C, Friend, J., and Booker, P. (1992). Housing in the Dearne Valley: Doing community OR with the Thurnscoe Tenants Housing Cooperative. Part 1-The involvement of the Community OR unit. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trefethen, F.N. (1954). A history of operational research. In: Operations Research for Management, vol. 1. McCloskey, J.F. and Trefethen, F.N. (eds.). John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E.L. and Bamforth, K.W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4, 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E.L. and Burgess, S. (1978). Multiple deprivation: A human and economic approach. Linkage, 3, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E.L., Higgin, G.W., Murray, H., and Pollock, A.B. (1963). Organizational Choice. Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troncale, L.R. (1985). The future of general systems research: Obstacles, potentials, case stud-ies. Systems Research, 2, 43–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1992). Panoptic reason and the search for totality: A critical assessment of the critical systems perspective. Human Relations, 45, 637–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Haupt, Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1996). Critical Systems Thinking for Citizens: A Research Proposal. Centre for Systems Studies Research Memorandum #10. Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 111, 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1956). General system theory. General Systems, 1, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General Systems Theory. Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, S. (1998). Rhetorics and realities in public service organizations: Systemic practice and organizational learning as critically reflexive action research (CRAR). Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11, 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.A. (1994). Development options for a rural community in Belize. International Transactions in Operational Research, 1, 453–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and Machine. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N. and Mingers, J. (1994). The nature of community OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Midgley, G., Ochoa-Arias, A.E. (2004). An Introduction to Community Operational Research. In: Midgley, G., Ochoa-Arias, A. (eds) Community Operational Research. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8911-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8911-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4716-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8911-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics