Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological Classification and Mapping of Aquatic Systems

  • Chapter
A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments

Abstract

Ecological classifications group similar items to provide a framework for organizing our knowledge about ecosystems (Driscoll et al., 1984; Jensen et al., 1991). Examples of such classification schemes include soil taxonomy (USDA-SCS, 1975), potential vegetation types (Driscoll et al., 1984), channel units (Hawkins et al., 1993), stream types (Rosgen, 1994), valley bottom types (USDA, 1978), and watershed types (Jensen et al., 1997). These classifications can be given a spatial component by describing their composition within ecological mapping units (Cleland et al., 1997).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Recommended Reading

  • Frissell, C. A.; Liss, W. J.; Warren, C. E.; Hurley, M. D. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ. Manage. 10(2):199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. V.; Swanson, F. J.; McKee, W. A.; Cummins, K. W. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41:540–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. E.; Bourgeron, P.; Everett, R.; Goodman, I. 1996. Ecosystem management: a landscape ecology perspective. J. Amer. Water Resources Assoc. 32: 203–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lotspeich, F. B. 1980. Watersheds as the basic ecosystem: this conceptual framework provides a basis for a natural classification system. Water Resources Bull. 16(4):581–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. R.; Edwards, C. J.; Jensen, M. E.; Paustian, S. J.; Parrot, H.; Hill, D. M. 1995. A hierarchical fram ework ofaquatic ecological units in North America. GTR-NC-176. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., North Central For. Exp. Sta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J.; Lozarich, D. G.; Beechie, T. J.; Ralph, S. C. 1992. General principles of classification and the assessment of conservation potential. In: Boon, P. J.; Caloa, P.; Petts, G. E., eds. River conservation and management. New York: John Wiley & Sons: 93–123.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Allen, T. F. H.; Starr, T. B. 1982. Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. F. H.; Hoekstra, T. W.; O’Neill, R. V. 1984. Interlevel relations in ecological research and management: some working principles from hierarchy theory. GTR-RM-110. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Rocky Mountain Res. Sta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1959. Symposium on the classification of brackish waters.Venice, April 8-14, 1958. Archivio di Oceanografia e Limnologia, Vol. 11 Supplemente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. 1980. Descriptions of the ecoregions of the United States.Misc. Publ. 1391. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey. R. G. 1983. Delineation of ecosystem regions. Environ. Manage.7(4):365–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States,2nd ed., rev. and expanded (1st ed. 1980). Misc. Publ. No. 1391 (rev.). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G.; Jensen, M. E.; Cleland, D. T.; Bourgeron, P. S. 1994. Design and use of ecological mapping units. In: Jensen, M. E.; Bourgeron, P. S., eds. Ecosystem management: principles and applications.GTR-PNW-318. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Pacific Northw. Res. Sta.: 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, C. V.; Frissell, C. A.; Hauer, F. R. (2001). Geo-morphology, logging roads, and the distribution of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus.)spawning in a forested river basin: implications for management and conservation. Trans. Amer. Fisheries Soc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, P. B.; Li, H. W. 1992. Riverine fishes. In: Calow, P.; Petts, G. E., eds. The rivers handbook.London: Blackwell Scientific Publications: 251–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisson, P. A.; Nielsen, J. L.; Palmason, R. A.; Grove, L. E. 1982. A system of naming habitat types in small streams, with examples of habitat utilization by salmonids during low streamflow. In: Armentrout, N. B., ed. Acquisition and utilization of aquatic habitat inventory information: Proceedings; October 28-30, 1981, Portland, OR. West. Div. Amer. Fisheries Soe: 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeron, P. S.; Jensen, M. E. 1994. An overview of ecological principles for ecosystem management. In: Jensen, M. E.; Bourgeron, P. S., eds. Ecosystem management: principles and applications.GTR-PNW-318. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Pacific Northw. Res. Sta.: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeron, P. S.; Humphries, H. C.; DeVelice, R. L.; Jensen, M. E. 1994. Ecological theory in relation to landscape evaluation and ecosystem characterization. In: Jensen, M. E.; Bourgeron, P. S., eds. Ecosystem management: principles and applications.GTR-PNW-318. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Pacific Northw. Res. Sta.: 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunke, M.; Gonser, T. 1997. The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biol.37:1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulger, A. J.; Hayden, B. P.; Monaco, M. E.; Melson, D. M.; McCormick-Ray, M. G. 1993. Biologically-based estuarine salinity zones derived from a multivariate analysis. Estuaries16(2):311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, W. D. N.; Sly, P. G. 1992. The development of an aquatic habitat classification system for lakes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, C. S.; Stewart, G. A. 1968. Methodology of integrated surveys. In: Aerial surveys and integrated studies.New York: UNESCO: 233–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, D. T.; Avers, P. E.; McNab, W. H.; Jensen, M. E.; Bailey, R. G.; King, T.; Walter, R. E. 1997. National hierarchical framework of ecological units. In: Boyce, M. S.; Haney, A., eds. Ecosystem management: applications for sustainable forest and wildlife resources.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press: 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constanza, R.; Wainger, L.; Folke, C.; Maler, K. 1993. Modeling complex ecological economic systems. BioScience 43:545–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L. M.; Carter, V.; Golet, F. C.; LaRoe, E. T. 1979 (reprinted in 1992). Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States.FWS/ OBS-79/31. Corvallis, OR: U.S. Dept. Interior, Fish and Wildl. Serv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culp, J. M.; Davies, R. W. 1982. Analysis of longitudinal zonation and the river continuum concept in the Oldman-South Saskatchewan River system. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.39:1258–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cupp, C. E. 1989. Stream corridor classification for forested lands of Washington.Olympia, WA: Washington Forest Protection Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, R. S.; Merkel, D. L.; Radloff, D. L.; Snyder, D. E.; Hagihara, J. S. 1984. An ecological land classification framework for the United States.Misc. Publ. 1439. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole, J. L. 1994. Stream habitat classification and restoration in the Blue Mountains of northeast Oregon. M.S. thesis. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T.; Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A. 1992. Cumulative effects of land use on salmon habitat in southwest Oregon coastal streams. Doctoral dissertation. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A.; Liss, W. J.; Warren, C. E.; Hurley, M. D. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ. Manage.10(2): 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. E.; Wu, Y.; Smith, S. J.; Wolfe-Murphy, S. A. 1994. Synoptic limnology of a diverse geological region: catchment and water chemistry. Hydrobiology 306:213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. V.; Swanson, F. J.; McKee, W. A.; Cummins, K. W. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience41:540–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hack, J. T. 1957. Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland.Prof. Pap. 294. Corvallis, OR: U.S. Dept. Interior, Geological Survey. B:45–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond 1954. Small-scale continental landform maps. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr.44:33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. R. 1988. Associations between stream valley geomorphology and riparian vegetation as a basis for landscape analysis in eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Environ. Manage.12:219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, H. A. 1975. River zonation and classification. In: Whitton, B. A., ed. River ecology.London: Blackwell Scientific: 312–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C. P.; Kershner, J. L.; Bisson, P. A.; Mason, D. B.; Decker, L. M.; Gregory, S. V.; McCullough, D. A.; Overton, C. K.; Reeves, G. H.; Steedman, R. J.; Young, M. K. 1993. A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat features. Fisheries18(6): 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornbeck, J. W.; Swank, W. T. 1992. Watershed ecosystem analysis as a basis for multiple-use management of eastern forests. Ecol. Appl.2(3):238–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huet, M. 1954. Biologie, profil en long et en travers des eaux courantes. Bull. Francais Pisciculture175:41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M.; Whittier, T. R.; Rohm, C. M.; Larsen, D. P. 1990. A regional framework for establishing recovery criteria. Environ. Manage.14:673–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N. 1975. The stream and its valley. Intern. Vereinigung Theoreoeetische Angewandte Limnologie 19:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illes, J. 1961. Versuch einer allgemein biozonotischen Gleiderung der Fliessgewasser Verhandlungen. Intern. Vereinigung Theroetische Angewandte Limnologie 13:834–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illes, J.; Botosaneanu, L. 1963. Problems et methodes de la classification et de 1a zonation ecologique des eaux courantes, considerees surtout du point de vue faunistique. Milleilungen. Intern. Vereinigung Theoretische Angwandte Limnologie12:1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, J. G.; Fitzgibbon, J.; Annable, W. K. 1996. A hierarchical evaluation system for characterizing watershed ecosystems for fish and habitat. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.53(Suppl. 1):312–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.; McNicoll, C.; Prather, M. 1991. Application of ecological classification to environmental effects analysis. J. Environ. Qual.20:24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. E.; Bourgeron, P.; Everett, R.; Goodman, I. 1996. Ecosystem management: a landscape ecology perspective. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc.32:203–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. E.; Goodman, I.; Brewer, K.; Frost, T.; Ford, G.; Nesser, J. 1997. Chapter 2: biophysical environments of the basin. In: Quigley, T. M.; Arbelbide, S. J., tech. eds. An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins: Volume 1.GTR-PNW-405. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Pacific Northw. Res. Sta.: 99–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J. R. M.; Minns, C. K. 1996. Is fish species richness at sites in the Canadian Great Lakes the result of local or regional factors? Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 53(Supplement 1):175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. 1967. The ghost in the machine.New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köppen, W. 1931. Grundriss der klimakunde.Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchler, A.W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. American Geographie Society Special Publication36:116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology73:1942–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotspeich, F. B. 1980. Watersheds as the basic ecosystem: this conceptual framework provides a basis for a natural classification system. Water Resour. Bull.16(4): 581–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. 1989. Correspondence between the distribution of fish assemblages in Wisconsin streams and Omernik’s ecoregions. Amer. Midland Naturalist122: 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. R.; Edwards, C. J.; Jensen, M. E.; Paustian, S. J.; Parrott, H.; Hill, D. M. 1995. A hierarchical framework of aquatic ecological units in North America (Nearctic Zone).GTR-NC-176. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., North Central For. Exp. Sta.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab, W. H.; Avers, P. E., compilers. 1994. Ecological subregions of the United States: section descriptions. Admin. Publ. WO-WSA-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meidinger, D.; Pojar, J. 1991. Ecosystems of British Columbia. Special Report. Series 6. Victoria, BC: Res. Branch, Ministry for.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W. 1988. Stream ecosystem theory: a global perspective. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc.7:263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W. 1994. Stream-riparian ecosystems: rationale and methods for basin-level assessments of management effects. In: Jensen, M. E.; Bourgeron, P. S., eds. Ecosystem management: principles and applications. GTR-PNW-318. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Pacific Northw. Res. Sta.: 149–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. R.; Buffington, J. M. 1993. Channel classification, prediction of channel response, and assessment of channel condition.Report FW-SH 10-93-002. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Dept. Geological Sci. and Quaternary Res. Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B.; Cech, J. J., Jr. 1988. Fishes: an introduction to icthyology.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J.; Lonzarich, D. G.; Beechie, T. J.; Ralph, S. C. 1992. General principles of classification and the assessment of conservation potential in rivers. In: Boon, P. J.; Calow, P.; Petts, G. E., eds. River conservation and management.New York: John Wiley & Sons: 93–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. L.; Platts, W. S.; Larsen, D. P.; Jensen, S. E. 1992. Trout distribution and habitat in relation to geology in the North Fork Humboldt River drainage, northeastern Nevada. Trans. Amer. Fisheries Soc.121: 405–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology.Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geogr.77:118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. V.; DeAngelis, D. L.; Waide, J. B.; Allen, T. F. H. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Monogr. Pop. Biol.23:1–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, W. S. 1979. Including the fishery system in land planning.GTR-INT-60. Ogden, UT: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Intermountain Res. Sta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L.; Allan, J. D. 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology76:606–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, G. C.; Frisseil, C. A.; Ralph, S. C. 1997. In-stream habitat unit classification: inadequacies for monitoring and some consequences for management. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc.33:879–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, G. C.; Hayden, B. P. 1993. Marine biogeographic provinces of the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas. In: Sherman, K.; Alexander, L.; Gold, B. D., eds. Large marine ecosystems: stress, mitigation, and sustainability. Washington, DC: AAAS Press: 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C. R. 1991. Regional diversity among Caribbean reef fishes. BioScience41(7):458–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena22:169–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosgen, D. R. 1996. Applied river morphology.Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, P. S. 1984. New South Wales estuaries: their origin and evolution. In: Thom, B. G., ed. Coastal geomorphology in Australia.Sydney: Academic Press: 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaber, P. R.; Kapinos, F. P.; Knapp, G. L. 1987. Hydrologie unit maps.Water-Supply Paper 2294. Corvallis, OR: U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies, T. A.; Barnes, B. V. 1985. A multifactor ecological classification of the northern hardwood and conifer ecosystems of Sylvania Recreation Area, Upper Peninsula, Michigan. Can. J. For. Res.15:949–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. A.; Ward, J. V. 1992. Management of aquatic resources in large catchments: recognizing interactions between ecosystem connectivity and environmental disturbance. In: Naiman, R. J., ed. Watershed management. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. A.; Ward, J. V. 1993. An ecosystem perspective of alluvial rivers: connectivity and the hyporheic corridor. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc.12:48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union33: 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy. 1997. A classification framework for freshwater communities. Proceedings of The Nature Conservancy’s aquatic community classification workshop; New Haven, MO; April 9-11, 1996. Chicago: Great Lakes Program Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonn, W. M.; Magnuson, J. J.; Rask, M.; Toivonen, J. 1990. Intercontinental comparison of small-lake fish assemblages: the balance between local and regional processes. Amer. Naturalist136:345–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D. L.; O’Neill, R. V.; Shugart, H. N., Jr. 1987. Landscape ecology: a hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. BioScience 37:119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service). 1978. Valley bottomland inventories with management implications: a working draft.Ogden, UT: U.S. Dept. of Agric., For. Serv., Intermountain Res. Sta.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-SCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service). 1975. Soil taxomony: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Agric. Handb. No. 436. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Agric., For. Serv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L.; Minshall, G. W.; Cummins, J. R.; Sedell, J. R.; Cushing, C. E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.37:130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V. 1997. An expansive perspective of riverine landscapes: pattern and process across scales. Gaia 6(1):52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. E. 1979. Toward classification and rationale for watershed management and stream protection.Report No. EPA-600/3–79-059. Corvallis, OR: U.S. Environ. Protect. Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, I. S. 1989. The land unit—a fundamental concept in landscape ecology, and its application. Landscape Ecol.3:67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mark E. Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iris A. Goodman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher A. Frissell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Kenneth Brewer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Patrick S. Bourgeron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, 200 East Broadway, Missoula, MT, 59807, USA

    Mark E. Jensen

  2. Institute of Alpine and Arctic Research, University of Colorado, 1560 30th Street, Boulder, CO, 80309-0450, USA

    Patrick S. Bourgeron

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jensen, M.E., Goodman, I.A., Frissell, C.A., Brewer, C.K., Bourgeron, P.S. (2001). Ecological Classification and Mapping of Aquatic Systems. In: Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (eds) A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8620-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8620-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98583-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8620-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation