Skip to main content

Overview and Commentary

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Business Creation

Part of the book series: International Studies in Entrepreneurship ((ISEN,volume 27))

Abstract

Business creation is a widespread and basic feature of all market economies. Contributions to job creation, new goods and services, a broader range of work opportunities, enhanced productivity, and economic growth benefit all nations and their citizens. The scope, importance, and contributions of business creation suggest there is considerable merit in understanding the major factors affecting the occurrence and outcomes of entrepreneurial activity. There is no question that personal, environmental, cultural, contextual, and institutional factors have an impact on major aspects of the business creation process. The challenge is in determining which factors have what types of impact at each stage of the business life course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This special issue of Regional Studies (28:4) includes seven articles representing the harmonized analyses completed in France, Germany, Italy, Northern Ireland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

  2. 2.

    Data for 1998–2005 was based on a consolidated database (Reynolds and Hechavarria 2007); data for 2006, 2007, and 2008, was taken from various annual GEM Executive summaries; data for 2009 was taken from the summary of the adult population surveys distributed by the GEM coordination team.

  3. 3.

    Data on traditional versus secular-rational and survival versus self-expressive values taken from Inglehart and Welzel (2005). Data on informal investors in the population based on GEM project data sets from 2000 to 2009. Data on GDP per capita and annual change in GDP per capita from the October 2009 World Economic Outlook data set. Index on ease of registering a business based on data provided in the World Bank Doing Business 2010 report (World Bank, 2009). Data on the proportion of the population with different degrees of educational attainment from Barro and Lee (2000); data on Tonga from 2006 Tonga Statistical Abstracts. Data regarding population growth and percent of population with 25–44 years of age based on the US Census International Data Base. Data on income inequality based on Solt (2009). Data on labor force participation of men and women taken from the World Bank Genderstats data bases for the year 2007 in April 2010. Missing values were replaced by the average value for other countries in the same region: Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, North America and Oceana, Asia, Middle East and North Africa, Asia, Latin America and Caribbean, and Sub-Sahara Africa. This was done for Traditional versus secular-rational and survival versus self-expression values for 13 countries, male and female labor force participation for two countries, educational attainment measure for six countries, the prevalence of business angels for six countries (but not Turkey or Angola), and for the GINI index of economic inequality for seven countries. The informal investor prevalence rate for Turkey was taken from Figure 1 of Bygrave and Quill (2007).

  4. 4.

    The SPSS regression procedure drops cases if missing values on an independent variable will preclude meeting the assumptions for creating linear additive models.

  5. 5.

    In the GEM interview schedule, firms that have paid salaries and wages to the owner managers are assumed to have reached a minimal level of profitability.

References

  • Alsos G, Ljunggren E (1998) Does the business start-up process differ by gender? A longitudinal study of nascent entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research Babson College, Wellesley, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Armington C, Acs ZJ (2002) The determinants of region variation in new firm formation. Reg Stud 36(1):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltrasaityte-Axelson J, Sauker A, Welter F (2008) Nascent entrepreneurship in Latvia: evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics 1st wave. Stockholm School of Economics in Riga, Riga, Latvia

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Lee J-W (2000) International data on educational attainment: updates and ­implications. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Center for international Development, Working Paper 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhave MP (1994) A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. J Bus Venturing 9:223–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma N, Levie J (2010) Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2009 executive report. London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, pp. 72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave WD, Quill M (2007) Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2006 financing report. Babson College and London Business School, Babson Park, MA and London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson P (2006) Nascent entrepreneurship: empirical studies and developments. Found Trends Entrepreneurship 2(1):1–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson P, Gordon SR (2009) Nascent entrepreneur(ship) research: a review. Queensland, Australia: Queensland University of Technology, Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson P, Reynolds PD (2009) PSED II and the comprehensive Australia study of entrepreneurial emergence (CAUSEE). In: Reynolds lD, Curtin RT (eds) New firm creation in the US: initial explorations with the PSED II data set. Springer, New York, pp 263–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmar F, Davidsson P (2000) Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 12:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2007) Eurostat-OECD manual on business demography statistics. Luxembourg: Eurostat Methodologies, Working Papers

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechavarria DM, Reynolds PD (2009) Cultural norms and business start-ups: the impact of national values on opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. Int J Manage Entrepreneurship 5:417–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills Gerald E, Singh RP (2004) Opportunity recognition. In: Gartner WB, Shaver KG, Carter NM, Reynolds PD (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics: the process of business creation. Age Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 259–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Briefing: migration in China, invisible and heavy shackles. The Economist 395 (8681):26–28, 8 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R, Welzel C (2005) Modernization cultural change and democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper L, Amit R, Guillen MF, Quesada JM (2007) Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries. Washington, DC: World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 4313

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozak M (2007) Micro, small, and medium enterprises: a collection of published data. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Shleifer A (2008) The unofficial economy and economy development. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College and Harvard University, Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2008) The economic consequences of legal origins. J Econ Lit 46(2):285–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney PG (2001) The common law and economic growth: Hayek might be right. J Legal Stud 30(2):503–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008) Measuring entrepreneurship: a digest of indicators. OECD-Eurostat Entrepreneurship Indicators Program, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PD (2007) New firm creation in the US: a PSED I overview. Found Trends Entrepreneurship 3(1):1–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PD (2008) Informal and early formal financial support in the business creation process: exploration with PSED II data set. Kauffman Foundation-Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Conference on Entrepreneurial Finance Presentation, Cleveland, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PD (2010). Middle East North Africa [MENA] Region Entrepreneurship. Report ­prepared for the International Development Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt, Contract 105213-001

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PD, Curtin RT (2008) Business creation in the United States: panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics II initial assessment. Found Trends Entrepreneurship 4(3):155–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PD, Hechavarria D (2007) Consolidated Global Entrepreneurship Monitor [GEM] Adult Population Survey Data Set: 1988–2003. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research. ICPSR Study 20320

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PD, Storey DJ, Westhead P (1994) Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Reg Stud 28(4):443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PD, Miller B, Maki W (1995) Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: US 1976–88. Small Bus Econ 7:389–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PD, Bosma N, Autio E, Hunt S, De Bono N, Servais I et al (2005) Global entrepreneurship monitor; Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Bus Econ 24:205–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WS (1950) Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am Sociol Rev 38:764–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson M, Davidsson P (2009) Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures. Small Bus Econ 33:229–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven CB, Burton MD, Reynolds PD (2009) Reconceiving the gestation window: the consequences of competing definitions of firm conception and birth. In: Reynolds PD, Curtin RT (eds) New firm creation in the US: initial explorations with the PSED II data set. Springer, New York, pp 219–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz S (1994) The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: the potential misuse of a concept and the consequences. Am J Public Health 84(5):819–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solt F (2009) Standardizing the world income inequality database. Soc Sci Q 90(2):231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelderen M, Thurik R, Bosma N (2005) Success and risk factors in the pre-start-up phase. Small Bus Econ 24:365–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelderen M, Bankaj Patel B, Roy Thurik A, Bosma N (2010) Encountered problems and outcome status in nascent entrepreneurship. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus Research in Management Report ERS_2009–008_ORG

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2009) Doing Business: 2010. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul D. Reynolds .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reynolds, P.D., Curtin, R.T. (2011). Overview and Commentary. In: Reynolds, P., Curtin, R. (eds) New Business Creation. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 27. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7536-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics