Skip to main content

Multicommodity Equilibrium Models: Accounting for Demand-Side Linkages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets

Abstract

Several of the models previously introduced in this book have focused on the market for a single commodity with a single price, such as power at a particular location in a particular hour. However, many of this book’s models instead considered several markets simultaneously, recognizing that linkages among them imply that equilibrium prices in one market cannot be calculated without considering how they affect, and are affected by, prices in other markets. In the earlier chapters, linkages among markets were mainly through the supply-side, in which the cost of providing commodity in one market depends in part on prices in other markets. For instance, a power generator with only a small amount of capacity with low running costs might experience a rise in its marginal cost of serving one part of the network if it also sells a lot of power elsewhere, thereby exhausting its cheap capacity. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the modeling of multiple energy markets in which it is instead the behavior of consumers that links the markets. In particular, the amount that final consumers buy of one commodity affects how much they are willing to pay for other commodities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Celebi and D. Fuller. A model for efficient consumer pricing schemes in electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 22(1):60-67, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Celebi and D. Fuller. Time of use pricing in electricity markets under different market structures. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, to appear, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Chen, J. Sijm, B.F. Hobbs, and W. Lise. Implications of CO2 emissions trading for short-run electricity market outcomes in Northwest Europe. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 34(3):251-281, Dec. 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Connolly, H. Lund, B.V. Mathiesen, and M. Leahy. A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems. Applied Energy, 87(4):1059–1082, 2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Cormio, M. Dicorato, A. Minoia, and M. Trovato. A regional energy planning methodology including renewable energy sources and environmental constraints. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 7(2):99–130, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Faruqui and S. Sergici. Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity - a survey of the experimental evidence. Manuscript, Brattle Group, San Francisco, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L.G. Fishbone and H. Abilock. MARKAL, A linear-programming model for energy-systems analysis – technical description of the BNL Version. International Journal of Energy Research, 5(4): 353-375, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Gabriel, A. Kydes, and P. Whitman. The National Energy Modeling System: a large-scale energy-economic equilibrium model. Operations Research, 49(1):14-25, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Hashimoto. A spatial Nash equilibrium model. In P. Harker, Editor. Spatial Price Equilibrium: Advances in Theory, Computation, and Application. Springer, Berlin, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B.F. Hobbs. The “Most Value” criterion: economic evaluation of utility demand-side management programs considering customer value. The Energy Journal, 12(2):67-91, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B.F. Hobbs. Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning. European J. Operational Research, 83(1):1-20, 1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B.F. Hobbs and S.K. Nelson. A nonlinear bilevel model for analysis of electric utility demand-side planning issues. Annals of Operations Research, 34:255-274, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. W.W. Hogan. Energy policy models for Project Independence, Computers and Operations Research, 2:251-271, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Klingman, N. Phillips, D. Steiger, R. Wirth, and W. Young. The challenges and success factors in implementing an integrated products planning system for Citgo. Interfaces, 16(3):1-19, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W.W. Leontief. Input-Output Economics. Oxford University Press, New York, 2nd edition, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.C. Morris, G.A. Goldstein, and V.M. Fthenakis. NEMS and MARKAL-MACRO models for energy-environmental-economic analysis: a comparison of the electricity and carbon reduction projections. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 7(3):207-216, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Loulou and M. Labriet. ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model, part I: model structure. Computational Management Science, 5(1-2):7-40, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F.H. Murphy and S.H. Shaw. The evolution of energy modeling at the Federal Energy Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Interfaces, 25(5):173-193, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S.W. Salant. Imperfect competition in the international energy market: a computerized Nash-Cournot model. Operations Research, 30(2):252-280, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P.A. Samuelson. Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. The American Economic Review, 42:283-303, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Turvey and D. Anderson. Electricity Economics.The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Zwart and M. Mulder. NATGAS: a model of the European natural gas market. CPB Memorandum 144, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gabriel, S.A., Conejo, A.J., Fuller, J.D., Hobbs, B.F., Ruiz, C. (2013). Multicommodity Equilibrium Models: Accounting for Demand-Side Linkages. In: Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 180. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6123-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics