Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of CO2 emissions trading for short-run electricity market outcomes in northwest Europe

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the short-run implications of CO2 trading for power production, prices, emissions, and generator profits in northwest Europe in 2005. Simulation results from a transmission-constrained oligopoly model are compared with theoretical analyses to quantify price increases and windfall profits earned by generators. The analyses indicate that the rates at which CO2 costs are passed through to wholesale prices are affected by market competitiveness, merit order changes, and elasticities of demand and supply. Emissions trading results in large windfall profits, much but not all of which is due to free allocation of allowances. Profits also increase for some generators because their generation mix has low emissions, and so they benefit from electricity price increases. Most emission reductions appear to be due to demand response not generation redispatch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellemare, B. (2006). EU Carbon Credit Prices Whipsaw. 2006, www.utilipoint.com/trm/.

  • Bohi D.R. and Zimmerman M. (1984). An update on econometric studies of energy demand. Annual Review of Energy, 9: 105–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacina M. and Guilli F. (2007). Electricity pricing under “Carbon Emissions Trading”: A dominant firm with competitive fringe model. Energy Policy, 35(8): 4200–4220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtraw D., Palmer K. and Bharvirkar R. (2002). The effect of on asset values of the allocation of carbon dioxide emission allowances. The Electricity Journal, 15(5): 51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell J., Mansur E.T. and Saravia C. (2008). Vertical arrangements, market structure, and competition: An analysis of restructured U.S. electricity markets. American Economic Review, 98(1): 237–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convery F.J. and Redmond L. (2007). Market and price developments in the European Union Emissions Trading Schemes. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1: 88–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, C., & Joutz, F. L. (2005). Weather effects on electricity loads: Modeling and forecasting. Final report for US EPA on weather effects on electricity loads.

  • Cunningham, J., Mistry, R., & Wood, N. (2006). Analysis of EU ETS news flow for an investor audience. London, UK, ENTEC Report to Carbon Trust. www.carbontrust.co.uk/Publications/publicationdetail.htm?productid=CTC619.

  • EC. (2003). Establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Brussels: European Commission.

  • EC. (2007). DG competition report on energy sector inquiry. www.ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/antitrust/others/sector_inquiries/energy/#final.

  • The European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. (2005). Call for auctioning of EU carbon allowances. www.pointcarbon.com/article.php?articleID=11528.

  • Espey J.A. and Espey M. (2004). Turning on the lights: A meta-analysis of residential electricity demand elasticities. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 36(1): 65–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. (2006). National Allocation Plan for the Federal Republic of Germany 2005–2007. www.bmu.de/english/emissions_trading/national_allocation_plan/doc/5894.php.

  • Harris D., Moselle B. and Lapuerta C. (2003). The development of a spot market exchange infrastructure for Belgium. The Brattle Group, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselknippe, H., & Ronie, K. (2006). Carbon 2006. www.pointcarbon.com/wimages/Carbon_2006_final_print.pdf.

  • Heslin J.S. and Hobbs B.F. (1989). A multiobjective probabilistic production costing model for analyzing emissions dispatching and fuel switching. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 4(3): 836–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs B.F. and Rijkers F.A.M. (2004). Strategic generation with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system—Part I: Formulation. IEEE Transactions On Power Systems, 19(2): 707–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs B.F., Rijkers F.A.M. and Wals A.F. (2004). Strategic generation with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system—Part II: Application. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 19(2): 872–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs B.F., Rijkers R.A.M. and Boots M. (2005). The more cooperation, the more competition? A Cournot analysis of the benefits of electric market coupling. The Energy Journal, 26(4): 69–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Honkatukia, J., Malkonen, V., & Perrels, A. (2006). Impacts of the European Emissions Trading System on Finnish Wholesale Electricity Prices.

  • Kate A.T. and Niles G. (2005). To what extent are cost savings passed on to consumers? An oligopoly approach. European Journal of Law and Economics, 20(3): 323–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keats K.M. and Neuhoff K. (2005). Allocation of carbon emission certificates in the power sector: How generator profit from grandfathered rights. Climate Policy, 5(1): 61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppitsch M.J. and Hobbs B.F. (1996). The effect of NOx regulations on emissions dispatch: A probabilistic production costing analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11(4): 1711–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, C. (2005). Impact of emission trading on power prices: A case study from the European Emission Trading Scheme. University Paris Dauphine and DEA d’Economie Industriell.

  • Linares P., Santos F.J., Vestosa M., Francisco J. and Lapiedra L. (2006). Impacts of the European emissions trading scheme directive and permit assignment method on the Spanish electricity sector. The Energy Journal, 27(1): 79–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Lise, W., & Kryseman, G. (2007). Long-term price and environmental effects in a liberalised electricity market. Energy Economics (forthcoming).

  • McKinsey & Ecofys (2006). EU ETS review – report on international competitiveness, European Commission, Directorate for Environment, Brussels.

  • Metzler C., Hobbs B.F. and Pang J.-S. (2003). Nash-Cournot equilibria in power markets on a linearized DC network with arbitrage: Formulation and properties. Networks and Spatial Economics, 3(2): 123–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moselle, B., Newebery, D., & Harris, D. (2006). Factors affecting geographic market definition and merger control for the Dutch electricity sector. www.dte.nl/images/Brattle%20Group%20NMa%20Geog%20rapport%20fusies%20energiesector%20June%202006_tcm7–87916.pdf.

  • Newcomer A., Blumsack S.A., Apt J., Lave L.B. and Morgan M.G. (2008). Short run effects of a price on carbon dioxide emissions from U.S. electric generators. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(9): 3139–3144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell R.G. and Stavins R.N. (2003). Cost heterogeneity and the potential savings from market-based policies. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 23(1): 43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newvalues Community. (2005). Dutch Minister and Parliament Find Windfall Profits an “Undesired Side Effect” of the EU ETS. www.pointcarbon.com/article.php?articleID=11528.

  • Parker, L. (2006). Climate change: The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS). In Resources, science, and industry division, congressional research service. Washington, DC: The Library of Conference.

  • Point Carbon. (2005). Dutch Minister Mulls Stricter Allocation to Energy Producers. www.pointcarbon.com/article.php?articleID=11528.

  • Point Carbon. (2006). Dutch Government Seeks Cure for Windfall Profits. www.pointcarbon.com/article.php?articleID=14043.

  • Scheepers M., Wals A.F. and Rijkers F.A.M. (2003). Position of large power producers in electricity markets of northwestern Europe. Energy Research Centre of The Netherlands, Petten, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijm J. (2004). The impact of the EU emissions Trading Scheme on the price of electricity in The Netherlands. Energy Research Center of The Netherlands (ECN), Petten, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijm J., Bakker S.J.A., Chen Y., Harmsen H.W. and Lise W. (2005). CO2 price dynamics: The impact of EU Emissions Trading on the price of electricity. Energy Research Centre of The Netherlands (ECN), Petten, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijm J.P.M., Chen Y., Donkelaar M.T., Hers S. and Scheppers M. (2006a). CO2 price dynamics: A follow-up analysis of the implications of EU emissions trading for the price of electricity. Petten, The Netherlands, Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijm J.P.M., Neuhoff K. and Chen Y. (2006b). CO2 cost pass through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy, 6(1): 49–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavins R.N. (1995). Transaction costs and tradable permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(2): 133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stennek J. and Verboven F. (2001). Merger control and enterprise competitiveness: Empirical analysis and policy recommendations. European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, 5: 129–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoft S. (2000). Power system economics. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. (2006a). Clean air markets—programs and regulations: Acid rain program. 2006, www.epa.gov/airmarkets/arp/index.html.

  • USEPA. (2006b). Clean air markets—programs and regulations: EPA’s NOx budget trading program. 2006, www.epa.gov/airmarkets/fednox/index.html.

  • Varian H.R. (1999). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach. W.W. Norton & Company, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals A. and Rijkers F. (2003). How will a CO2 price affect the playing field in the Northwest European power sector?. Research Symposium on European Electricity, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao J., Adler I. and Oren S.S. (2008). Modeling and computing two-settlement oligopolistic equilibrium in congested electricity networks. Operations Research, 56(1): 34–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yihsu Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Sijm, J., Hobbs, B.F. et al. Implications of CO2 emissions trading for short-run electricity market outcomes in northwest Europe. J Regul Econ 34, 251–281 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-008-9069-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-008-9069-9

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation