Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Testers and Combining Ability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding

Part of the book series: Handbook of Plant Breeding ((HBPB,volume 6))

Abstract

The inbred–hybrid concept was created in the public sector with the direct influence of Darwin, Festetics, Mendel, and Vilmorin. East related those biological principles to the more practical plant improvement studies to achieve his goals (Hayes, 1956). The progeny test was defined by Allard (1960) as ‘a test of the value of a genotype based on the performance of its offspring produced in some definite system of mating.’ It was used as early as 1850 by Vilmorin in France, and it proved to be a highly effective procedure for the improvement of sugar content of sugar beets (Beta vulgaris). This method of line selection with progeny testing was known as the ‘Vilmorin method’ or ‘Vilmorin isolation principle’ and was introduced in several plant breeding programs in the latter part of the 19th century. The progeny test in maize was first used in 1896 by Hopkins, starting the well-known program for half-sib recurrent selection of maize oil and protein content (e.g., the ear-to-row half-sib selection procedure).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allard, R. W. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, J. C. S., and R. W. Curnow. 1966. On the choice of tester parent for the breeding of synthetic varieties of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 6:541–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., and W. L Brown. 1952. The history of the common maize varieties of the United States Corn Belt. Agric. Hist. 26:2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barata, C., and M. J. Carena. 2006. Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data. Euphytica 151:339–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartual, R., and A. R. Hallauer. 1976. Variability among unselected maize inbred lines developed by full-sibbing. Maydica 21:49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, L. F. 1981. Review of methods used by breeders to develop superior corn inbreds. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf. 36:199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, R. 1991. Correlation between testcross performance of lines at early and late selfing generations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, R. 1992. Retention of genetically superior lines during early-generation testcrossing of maize. Crop Sci. 32:933–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betran, F. J., and A. R. Hallauer. 1996. Hybrid improvement after reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Maydica 41:25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betran, F. J., M. Menz, and M. Banzinger. 2004. Corn. In Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and Production, C. W. Smith, J. Betran, and E. C. A. Runge, (eds.), pp. 305–98. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. L. 1950. The origin of corn belt maize. J. NY Bot. Gard. 51:242–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. L. 1967. Results of non-selective inbreeding in maize. Züchter 37:155–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckler, E. S., J. B. Holland, P. J. Bradbury, C. B. Acharya, P. J. Brown, C. Browne, E. Ersoz, S. Flint-Garcia, A. Garcia, J. C. Glaubitz, M. M. Goodman, C. Harjes, K. Guill, D. E. Kroon, S. Larsson, N. K. Lepak, H. Li, S. E. Mitchell, G. Pressoir, J. A. Peiffer, M. O. Rosas, T. R., Rocherford, M. C. Romay, S. Romero, S. Salvo, H. S. Villeda, H. S. da Silva, Q. Sun, F. Tian, N. Upadyayula, D. Ware, H. Yates, J. Yu, Z. Zhang, S. Kresovich, and M. D. McMullen. 2009. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325:714–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., and H. Z. Cross. 2003. Plant density and maize germplasm improvement in the Northern corn belt. Maydica 48:105–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., and A. R. Hallauer. 2001. Expression of heterosis in Leaming and Midland Yellow Dent populations. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 108:73–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., J. Yang, J. C. Caffarel, M. Mergoum, and A. R. Hallauer. 2009. Do different production environments justify separate maize breeding programs? Euphytica 169:141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, G. N. 1916. Correlated characters in maize breeding. J. Agric. Res. 6:435–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R. E. 1964. Selection procedures in corn improvement. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. Proc. 19:87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R. E. 1977. An evaluation of RRS with inbred line testers. North Cent. Corn Breed. Res. Comm. (NCR-2) Rep. Mimeogr. Library, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R. E. 1979. Inbred lines versus the populations as testers in reciprocal recurrent selection. Crop Sci. 19:881–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R. E., H. F. Robinson, and P. H. Harvey. 1949. A breeding procedure designed to make use of both general and specific combining ability. Agron. J. 41:360–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, J. R. 1943. The value of double cross hybrids involving inbreds of similar and diverse genetic origin. Sci. Agric. 23:287–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cress, C. E. 1966. Heterosis of the hybrid related to gene frequency differences between two populations. Genetics 53:269–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darrah, L. L., S. A. Eberhart, and L. H. Penny. 1972. A maize breeding study in Kenya. Crop Sci. 12:605–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. L. 1927. Report of the plant breeder. Rep. Puerto Rico Agric. Exp. Stn. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, J. W. 1982. Theory for transfer of genes. Crop Sci. 22:631–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, J. W., and G. R. Johnson. 2009. Epistatic models improve prediction of performance in corn. Crop Sci. 49:763–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eathington, S. R., J. W. Dudley, and G. F. Rufener II. 1997. Usefulness of marker-QTL associations in early generation selection. Crop Sci. 37:1686–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S. A. 1974. Annu. Rep. Corn Breed. Invest. Mimeogr. Ames, Iowa, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, R. C., and A. A. Bryan. 1940a. Effect of method of combining the four inbred lines of a double cross of maize upon the yield and variability of the resulting double crosses. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 32:347–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, R. C., and A. A. Bryan 1940b. Effect of the method of combining two early and two late inbred lines of corn upon the yield and variability of the resulting double crosses. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 32:645–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Lakany, M. A., and W. A. Russell. 1971. Relationship of maize characters with yield in testcrosses of inbreds at different plant densities. Crop Sci. 11:698–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etheridge, W. C. 1921. Characters connected with the yield of the corn plant. Missouri Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gama, E. E. G., and A. R. Hallauer. 1977. Relation between inbred and hybrid traits in maize. Crop Sci. 17:703–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. M. 1948a. Relative value of two testers for estimating topcross performance in segregating maize populations. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 40:45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. M. 1948b. Inheritance of combining ability in maize hybrids. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 40:58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, J. B. 1950. Analysis of quantitative gene action by constant parent regression and related techniques. Genetics 35:303–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, J. B. 1953. An analysis of tomato yield components in terms of genotypic and environmental effects. Iowa Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, B. 1956a. A generalized treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance. Heredity 10:31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, J. B. 1956b. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 9:463–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1975. Relation of gene action and type of tester in maize breeding procedures. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. Proc. 30:150–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R., and M. J. Carena. 2009. Maize breeding. In Handbook of Plant Breeding, M. J. Carena, (ed.), pp. 3–98. Springer, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R., and E. Lopez-Perez. 1979. Comparisons among testers for evaluating lines of corn. Annu. Hybrid Corn. Ind. Res. Conf. Proc. 34:57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R., and J. H. Sears. 1973. Changes in quantitative traits associated with inbreeding in a synthetic variety of maize. Crop Sci. 13: 327–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R., and O. S. Smith. 1979. Registration of maize germplasm (reg. GP 81 and GP 82). Crop Sci. 19:755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, H. K. 1926. Present day problems of corn breeding. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 18:344–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, H. K. 1956. I saw hybrid corn develop. Annu. Hybrid Corn. Ind. Res. Conf Proc. 11:48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, H. K. 1963. A Professor’s Story of Hybrid Corn. Burgess, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, H. K., and R. J. Garber. 1919. Synthetic production of high protein corn in relation to breeding. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 11:308–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, H. K., and I. J. Johnson. 1939. The breeding of improved selfed lines of corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 31:710–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, B. I. 1954a. The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics 10:235–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, B. I. 1954b. The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics 39:789–909.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. R. 1952. Specific and general combining ability. In Heterosis, J. W. Gowen, (ed.), pp. 350–70. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoegemeyer, T. C., and A. R. Hallauer. 1976. Selection among and within full-sib families to develop single-crosses of maize. Crop Sci. 16:76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, E. S. 1963. A comparison of S1 line and S1 plant evaluation for combining ability in corn. Crop Sci. 3:519–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, E. S., W. H. Chapman, M. C. Lutrick, and H. W. Lundy. 1969. Comparison of selection based on yield of topcross progenies and S2 progenies in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 9: 539–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, E. S., W. H. Lundy, M. C. Lutrick, and W. H. Chapman. 1973. Comparison of three methods of recurrent selection in maize. Crop Sci. 13:485–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, E. S., M. C. Lutrick, W. H. Chapman, and F. G. Martin. 1976. Effect of recurrent selection for combining ability with a single-cross tester in maize. Crop Sci. 16:5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyrkas, A., and M. J. Carena. 2005. Response to long-term selection in early maturing maize synthetic varieties. Euphytica 143:43–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, H. F. 1945. Recurrent selection for specific combining ability in corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 37:134–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, H. F. 1946. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, H. F. 1952. Recurrent selection and overdominance. In Heterosis, J. W. Gowen, (ed.), pp. 451–73. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. T. 1929. Correlation studies with inbred and crossbred strains of maize. J. Agric. Res. 39:677–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. T. 1934. Methods of estimating the performance of double crosses in corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 26:199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. T. 1935. The effect of inbreeding and of selection within inbred lines of maize upon the hybrids made after successive generations of selfing. Iowa State J. Sci. 3:429–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. T. 1940. The segregation of genes affecting yield of grain in maize. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 32:55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. T., and A. M. Brunson. 1932. Methods of testing inbred lines of maize in crossbred combinations. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 24:523–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, S. D., W. E. Kuhn, and R. L. McConnell. 1983. Combining ability in elite U.S. maize germplasm. Annu. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf. Proc. 38:87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J. L. 1954. Analysis of continuous variation in a diallel cross of Nicotiana rustica varieties. Genetics 39:767–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. R. 2004. Marker-assisted selection. pp. 293–309. In Plant Breeding Reviews, J. Janick, (ed.), pp. 293–309. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, I. J., and H. K. Hayes. 1936. The combining ability of inbred lines of Golden Bantam sweet corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 28:246–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, I. J., and H. K. Hayes. 1940. The value of hybrid combinations of inbred lines of corn selected from single crosses by the pedigree method of breeding. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 32:479–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. F. 1918. The effect of inbreeding and crossbreeding upon development. Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 207:5–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, L., and H. E. Brewbaker. 1927. A comparison of selfed lines of corn and first generation crosses between them. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 19:819–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. R. 1949. A comparison involving the number of and relationships between testers in evaluating inbred lines of maize. Agron. J. 41:323–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O., and R. W. Curnow. 1961. The partial diallel cross. Biometrics 17:229–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, J. H. 1924. Correlation among quantitative characters in maize. J. Agric. Res. 28: 1095–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, J. H. 1926. Correlated characters in a maize hybrid. J. Agric. Res. 32:39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesselbach, T. A. 1922. Corn investigations. Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 20:5–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, I. 1970. Some methodological problems of the production of inbred lines. In Some Methodological Achievements of the Hungarian Hybrid Maize Breeding, I. Kovacs (ed.), pp. 54–72. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, C. W., and H. F. Stoneberg. 1925. Associations between number of kernel rows, productiveness, and deleterious characters in corn. J. Agric. Res. 31:83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lile, S. M., and A. R. Hallauer. 1994. Relation between S2 and later generation testcrosses of two corn populations. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 101:19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeffel, F. A. 1964. S1 crosses compared with crosses of homozygous lines. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. Proc. 19:95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeffel, F. A. 1971. Development and utilization of parental lines. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. Proc. 26:209–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonnquist, J. H. 1949. The development and performance of synthetic varieties of corn. Agron. J. 41:153–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonnquist, J. H. 1950. The effect of selecting for combining ability within segregating lines of corn. Agron. J. 42:503–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonnquist, J. H., and M. F. Lindsey. 1964. Topcross versus S1 line performance in corn (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 4:580–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonnquist, J. H., and M. D. Rumbaugh. 1958. Relative importance of test sequence for general and specific combining ability in corn breeding. Agron. J. 50:541–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Perez, E. 1979. Comparisons among five different testers for the evaluation of unselected lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, H. H. 1912. The relation of certain ear characters to yield in corn. Am. Breeders’ Assoc. Rep. 7:29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, H. H., and J. B. Wentz. 1917. Correlations between ear characters and yield in corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 9:315–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzinger, D. F. 1953. Comparison of three types of testers for the evaluation of inbred lines of corn. Agron. J. 45:493–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzinger, D. F., G. F. Sprague, and C. C. Cockerham. 1959. Diallel crosses of maize in experiments repeated over locations and years. Agron. J. 51:346–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger, A. E. 1999. Genetic diversity and heterosis. In The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, J. G. Coors and S. Pandey (eds.), pp. 99–118. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger, A. E., J. Boppenmaier, B. S. Dhillon, W. G. Pollmer, and R. G. Herrmnn. 1992. Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreds: II. Relationship to performance of hybrids within versus heterotic groups for forage traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 672–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, R. H., J. H. Lonnquist, J. Veléz Fortuno, and C. Johnson. 1965. The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52:139–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mumm, R. H., and J. W. Dudley. 1994. A classification of 148 U.S. maize inbreds: I. Cluster analysis based on RFLPs. Crop. Sci. 37:617–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson-Leissner, G. 1927. Relation of selfed strains of corn to F1 crosses between them. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 19:440–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obaidi, M. M., B. B. Johnson, L. D. Van Fleck, S. D. Kachman, and O. S. Smith. 1998. Family per se response in selfing and selection in maize based on testcross performance: A simulation study. Crop Sci. 38: 367–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obilana, A. T., and A. R. Hallauer. 1974. Estimation of variability of quantitative traits in BSSS by using unselected maize inbred lines. Crop Sci. 14:99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osler, R. D., E. J. Wellhausen, and G. Palacios. 1958. Effect of visual selection during inbreeding upon combining ability in corn. Agron. J. 50: 45–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, K. T., and H. K. Hayes. 1949. A comparison of combining ability in F3 and F2 lines of corn. Agron. J. 41:383–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlings, J. O., and D. L. Thompson. 1962. Performance level as criterion for the choice of maize testers. Crop Sci. 2:217–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, F. D. 1924. Effects of selection on the yield of a cross between varieties of corn. USDA Bull. 1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, F. D. 1945. Isolating better foundation inbreds for use in corn hybrids. Genetics 30: 455–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, F. D., and L. S. Mayer. 1925. The productiveness of successive generations of self-fertilized lines of corn and of crosses between them. USDA Bull. 1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, F. D., and J. G. Willier. 1925. A statistical study of the relation between seed-ear characters and productiveness in corn. USDA Bull. 1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W. A., and S. A. Eberhart. 1975. Hybrid performance of selected maize lines from reciprocal recurrent selection and testcross selection programs. Crop Sci. 15:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W. A., and A. H. Teich. 1967. Selection in Zea mays L. by inbred line appearance and testcross performance in low and high plant densities. Iowa Agric. Home Econ. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W. A., S. A. Eberhart, and U. A. Vega. 1973. Recurrent selection for specific combining ability for yield in two maize populations. Crop Sci. 13:257–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senior, M. L., J. P. Murphy, M. M. Goodman, and C. W. Stuber. 1998. Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationship in maize using agarose gel system. Crop Sci. 38:1088–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, D. E. W., and R. A. Bradley. 1957. The comparison of the sensitiveness of similar experiments. Theor. Ann. Math. Stat. 28:902–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. C. 1974. Genetic and environmental variances and covariances estimated in the maize (Zea mays L.) variety, Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic. Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, W. R., and O. E. Nelson. 1945. The improvement of naturally cross-pollinated plants by selection in self-fertilized lines. IV. Combining ability of successive generations of inbred sweet corn. Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 490:458–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, O. S. 1986. Covariance between line per se and testcross performance. Crop Sci. 26: 540–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. S., E. C. L. Chin, H. Shu, O. S. Smith, S. J. Wall, M. L. Senior, S. E. Mitchell, S. Kresovich, and J. Ziegle. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:163–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnino, A., M. J. Carena, E. P. Guimaraes, R. Baumung, D. Pilling, and B. Rischkowsky. 2007. An assessment of the use of molecular markers in developing countries. In Markers-Assisted Selection: Current Status and Future Perspectives in Crops, Livestock, Forestry, and Fish, E. P. Guimaraes, J. Ruane, B. D. Scherf, A. Sonnino, J. D. Dargie, (eds.), pp. 15–26. Food and Agriculture Organization of the united Nations, Rome, IT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F. 1939. An estimation of the number of top-crossed plants required for adequate representation of a corn variety. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 38:11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F. 1946. Early testing of inbred lines of corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 38:108–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F. 1952. Early testing and recurrent selection. In Heterosis, J. W. Gowen, (ed.), pp. 400–17. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F. 1955. Corn breeding. In Corn and Corn Improvement, G. F. Sprague, (ed.), pp. 221–92. Academic, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F., and P. A. Miller. 1952. The influence of visual selection during inbreeding on combining ability in corn. Agron. J. 44:258–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F., and L. A. Tatum. 1942. General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 34:923–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walejko, R. N., and W. A. Russell. 1977. Evaluation of recurrent selection for specific combining ability in two open-pollinated maize cultivars. Crop Sci. 17:647–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellhausen, E. J., and S. Wortman. 1954. Combining ability in S1 and derived S3 lines of corn. Agron. J. 46:86–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. K. 1939. The relationship between the origin of selfed lines of corn and their value in hybrid combinations. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 31:131–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Arnel R. Hallauer

  2. Department of Plant Sciences #7670, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA

    Marcelo J. Carena

  3. University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    J. B. Miranda Filho

Authors
  1. Arnel R. Hallauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcelo J. Carena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. B. Miranda Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnel R. Hallauer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hallauer, A.R., Carena, M.J., Filho, J.B.M. (2010). Testers and Combining Ability. In: Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Handbook of Plant Breeding, vol 6. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation