Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do different production environments justify separate maize breeding programs?

  • Review
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different production environments are being adopted by farmers. Therefore, allocation of resources to breeding research that targets different production environments should be continuously assessed. Agronomists should conduct extensive hybrid × production environment interaction research before recommending breeders to conduct separate breeding programs for each production environment. The lack of interactions between genotypes and production environments (e.g., tillage) would not justify conducting separate breeding programs and duplicating breeding resources. On the other hand, separate breeding programs would be necessary if cultivar rankings differ. The purpose of this paper is to review the available literature on experiments designed to test genotype × tillage interactions (GT) in maize (Zea mays L.). No-till system (NT) and conventional till system (CT) were utilized as examples of different production environments. The majority of experiments reviewed showed that there is no need to develop cultivars specific to NT because the cultivars that were developed under CT systems performed relatively the same under NT. The magnitude of GT interactions found was very small to expect better cultivars from breeding under NT. Additional research is needed to confirm these conclusions, especially when applied to other production environments (e.g., development of cultivars under organic conditions). Scientists should evaluate genotype by tillage interactions before investing additional resources in breeding for those specific target environments. Top yielding genotypes seem be consistent across years, locations, inputs; and most of the present evidence suggests that breeding for specific till systems is not necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agele SO, Ewulo BS, Oyewusi IK (2005) Effects of some soil management systems on soil physical properties, microbial biomass and nutrient distribution under rainfed maize production in a humid rainforest Alfisol. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 72:121–134. doi:10.1007/s10705-004-7306-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Kaisi MM, Yin X (2005) Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and carbon dioxide emission in maize-soybean rotations. J Environ Qual 34:437–445

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Kaisi MM, Yin X, Licht MA (2005) Soil carbon and nitrogen changes as affected by tillage system and crop biomass in a maize-soybean rotation. Appl Soil Ecol 30:174–191. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EL (1986) No-till effects on yield and plant density of maize hybrids. Agron J 78:323–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayhan Y, Kayisoglu B, Gonulol E, Yalcin H, Sungur N (2006) Possibilities of direct drilling and reduced tillage in second crop silage maize. Soil Tillage Res 88:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermudez M, Mallarino AP (2004) Maize response to starter fertilizer and tillage across and within fields having no-till management histories. Agron J 96:776–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyaert RP, Schott JW, White PH (2002) Tillage effects on maize production in a coarse-textured soil in southern Ontario. Agron J 94:767–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakke JP, Francis CA, Nelson LA, Gardner CO (1983) Genotype by cropping system interactions in maize grown in a short-season environment. Crop Sci 23:868–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger H, Schloen M, Schmidt W, Geiger HH (2008) Quantitative genetic studies on breeding maize for adaptation to organic farming. Euphytica 163:501–510. doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9723-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess MS, Mehuys GR, Madramootoo CA (1996) Tilage and crop residue effects on maize production in Quebec. Agron J 88:792–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Busscher WJ, Sojka RE (1987) Enhancement of subsoiling effect on soil strength by conservation tillage. Trans ASAE 30:888–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Busscher WJ, Sojka RE, Doty CW (1986) Residual effects of tillage on Coastal plain soil strength. Soil Sci 141:144–148. doi:10.1097/00010694-198602000-00007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter PR, Barnett KH (1987) Corn-hybrid performance under conventional and no-tillage systems after thinning. Agron J 79:919–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MR, Sanderson JB, Ivany JA, White RP (2002) Influence of rotation and tillage on forage maize productivity, weed species, and soil quality of a fine sandy loam in the cool-humid climate of Atlantic Canada. Soil Tillage Res 67:85–98. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00043-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassot A, Stamp P, Richner W (2001) Root distribution and morphology of maize seedlings as affected by tillage and fertilizer placement. Plant Soil 231:123–135. doi:10.1023/A:1010335229111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CTIC (1983) 1982 Survey of conservation tillage practices. Conservation Technology Information Center, West Lafayette, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • CTIC (2005) 2004 National crop residue management survey. Conservation Technology Information Center, West Lafayette, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Dam RF, Mehdi BB, Burgess MSE, Madramootoo CA, Mehuys GR, Callum IR (2005) Soil bulk density and crop yield under eleven consecutive years of maize with different tillage and residue practices in a sandy loam soil in central Canada. Soil Tillage Res 84:41–53. doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW (1980) Soil microbial and biochemical changes associated with reduced tillage. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:765–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duiker SW, Haldeman JF Jr, Johnson DH (2006) Tillage × maize hybrid interactions. Agron J 98:436–442. doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrizzi KP, Garcia FO, Costa JL, Picone LI (2005) Soil water dynamics, physical properties and maize and wheat responses to minimum and no-tillage systems in the southern Pampas of Argentina. Soil Tillage Res 81:57–69. doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filipovic D, Košutic S, Gospodaric Z (2004) Influence of different soil tillage systems on fuel consumption, labour requirement and yield in maize and winter wheat production. Agric Sci Prof Rev 10:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers AJ, Stuedemann JA (2008) Early response of soil organic fractions to tillage and integrated crop-livestock production. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:613–625. doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers AJ, Hons FM, Zuberer DA (1995) Tillage and crop effects on seasonal dynamics of soil CO2 evolution, water content, temperature, and bulk density. Appl Soil Ecol 2:95–109. doi:10.1016/0929-1393(94)00044-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funnermark WL, Hallauer AR (1985) Cold tolerance in corn hybrids as affected by tillage systems and planting dates. Proc Iowa Acad Sci 92:58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Govaerts B, Mezzalama M, Sayre K-D, Crossa J, Nicol J-M, Deckers J (2006) Long-term consequences of tillage, residue management, and crop rotation on maize/wheat root rot and nematode populations in subtropical highlands. Appl Soil Ecol 32:305–315. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DR, Kladivko EJ, Mannering JV, West TD, Parsons SD (1998) Long-term tillage and rotation effects on maize growth and yield on high and low organic matter, poorly drained soils. Agron J 80:599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Colvin TS (1985) Corn hybrids response to four methods of tillage. Agron J 77:547–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorson A-D, Mosier A-R, Reule C-A, Bausch W-C (2006) Nitrogen and tillage effects on irrigated continuous maize yields. Agron J 98:63–71. doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe HN, Dwyer LM, Stewart DW, White RP, Culley JLB (1996) Tillage, hybrid and thermal factors in maize establishment in cool soils. Soil Tillage Res 40:39–54. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(96)01045-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersterman OB, Pierce FJ, Rossman EC (1988) Performance of commercial corn hybrids under conventional and no-tillage systems. J Prod Agric 1:202–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Holanda FSR, Mengel DB, Paula MB, Carvaho JG, Bertoni JC (1998) Influence of crop rotations and tillage systems on phosphorus and potassium stratification and root distribution in the soil profile. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29:2383–2394. doi:10.1080/00103629809370118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker B-A, Morris T-F, Peters R, Cardon Z-G (2005) Long-term effects of tillage and maize stalk return on soil carbon dynamics. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:188–196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iowa State University (2005) Resources conservation practices: tillage management and soil organic matter [Online]. Iowa State University Extension Service, Ames. Available at: http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1901I.pdf (Accessed Feb 2007)

  • Jug D, Stipesevic B, Jug I, Samota D, Vukadinovic V (2007) Influence of different soil tillage systems on yield of maize. Cereal Res Commun 35:557–560. doi:10.1556/CRC.35.2007.2.98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DL, Sojka RE (1985) Hybrid and irrigation effects on conservation tillage corn in The Coastal Plain. Agron J 77:561–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar TC, Crosbie TM, Cruse RM, Erbach DC, Timmons DR, Potter KN (1987) Growth and productivity of four corn hybrids as affected by tillage. Agron J 79:477–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khajanji S-N, Gautam R-C, Patel J-R (2002) Effect of tillage and weed control methods on growth and yield of maize. J Maharashtra Agric Univ 27:277–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Košutic S, Filipovic D, Gospodaric Z (1998) Influence of different soil tillage systems on yield, energy and labour requirement in spring barley production. Poljoprivreda 4:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman DE, Steffey KL (1982) Insect control in no-till corn. Proc Annu Corn Sorghum Res Conf 37:118–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo P, Gyuricza C (2004) Effect of the ridge tillage system on some selected soil physical properties in a maize monoculture. Acta Agron Hung 52:211–220. doi:10.1556/AAgr.52.2004.3.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessiter F (1983) 1982–1983 No till farmer acreage survey. No-till Farmer, Brookfield, WI, pp 8–9

  • Lorenzana RE, Bernardo R (2007) Genetic correlation between corn performance in organic and conventional production systems. North Central Regional Corn Breeding Research Meeting, St. Charles, pp 21–22. http://corn2.agron.iastate.edu/NCR167/Abstracts/2007/NCCC167%20abstract%20Lorenzana.pdf. Cited 02 February 2009

  • Monneveux P, Quillerou E, Sanchez C, Lopez-Cesati J (2006) Effect of zero tillage and residues conservation on continuous maize cropping in a subtropical environment (Mexico). Plant Soil 279:95–105. doi:10.1007/s11104-005-0436-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse KE, Crosbie TM (1986) Interactions of maize hybrids with tillage systems. Agron J 78:951–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse KE, Crosbie TM (1987) Genotype by tillage interactions of S1 lines from two maize synthetics. Crop Sci 27:440–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyvall RF (1982) Disease control. In: Cruse RM, Horton R (eds) Tillage and the soil environment. Iowa Cooperative Extension Service Bull. CE-1755

  • Pereira de Mello Ivo WM, Mielniczuk J (1999) Influence of soil structure on the distribution and morphology of maize roots under three tillage methods. Rev Bras Cienc Do Solo 23:135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin R, Stamp P, Richner W (2006) Impact of tillage on maize rooting in a Cambisol and Luvisol in Switzerland. Soil Tillage Res 85:50–61. doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratonyi T, Huzsvai L, Nagy J, Megyes A (2005) Evaluation of soil tillage systems in maize production. Acta Agron Hung 53:53–57. doi:10.1556/AAgr.53.2005.1.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan P (2004) Sustainable soil management: soil systems guide. ATTRA National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service. National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT)

  • Tripplet GB Jr (1985) Principles of weed control for reduced-tillage corn production. In: Wiese AF (ed) Weed control in limited-tillage systems. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachostergios DN, Roupakias DG (2008) Response to conventional and organic environment of thirty-six lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) varieties. Euphytica 163:449–457. doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9712-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall DA, Stobbe EH (1983) The response of eight corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids to zero tillage in Manitoba. Can J Plant Sci 63:753–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin H, Cakir E (2006) Tillage effects and energy efficiencies of subsoiling and direct seeding in light soil on yield of second crop maize for silage in Western Turkey. Soil Tillage Res 90:250–255. doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngquist WC (1983) Maize breeding for the Nebraska panhandle influence of tillage system and location on genotype testing and selection. MS Thesis. University of Nebraska

  • Zougmore R, Nagumo F, Hosikawa A (2006) Nutrient uptakes and maize productivity as affected by tillage system and cover crops in a subtropical climate at Ishigaki, Okinawa, Japan. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:509–518. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.00067.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA

    M. J. Carena, J. Yang, J. C. Caffarel & M. Mergoum

  2. Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

    A. R. Hallauer

Authors
  1. M. J. Carena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. C. Caffarel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Mergoum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. R. Hallauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Carena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carena, M.J., Yang, J., Caffarel, J.C. et al. Do different production environments justify separate maize breeding programs?. Euphytica 169, 141–150 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-9908-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-9908-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation