Skip to main content

Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Internet Research

Abstract

This article presents Information Infrastructure Studies, a research area that takes up some core issues in digital information and organization research. Infrastructure Studies simultaneously addresses the technical, social, and organizational aspects of the development, usage, and maintenance of infrastructures in local communities as well as global arenas. While infrastructure is understood as a broad category referring to a variety of pervasive, enabling network resources such as railroad lines, plumbing and pipes, electrical power plants and wires, this article focuses on information infrastructure, such as computational services and help desks, or federating activities such as scientific data repositories and archives spanning the multiple disciplines needed to address such issues as climate warming and the biodiversity crisis. These are elements associated with the internet and, frequently today, associated with cyberinfrastructure or e-science endeavors. We argue that a theoretical understanding of infrastructure provides the context for needed dialogue between design, use, and sustainability of internet-based infrastructure services. This article outlines a research area and outlines overarching themes of Infrastructure Studies. Part one of the paper presents definitions for infrastructure and cyberinfrastructure, reviewing salient previous work. Part two portrays key ideas from infrastructure studies (knowledge work, social and political values, new forms of sociality, etc.). In closing, the character of the field today is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This reminds us that while social and organizational theory have made inroads into the technically dominated fields of information infrastructure design, maintaining such accomplishments will require continuous and active engagement by practicing social scientists in the field of cyberinfrastructure.

  2. 2.

    The claims of revolutionary change about our information infrastructure are somewhat akin to the millennialism of every generation since the industrial revolution. We are living the epoch of the database founded in the era of governmentality (late eighteenth century) – and all the claims that we see today about speed, time, and distribution have been with us since that epoch.

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R. (1956). Introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, D. E., Droegemeier, K. K., Feldman, S. I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M. L., Messerschmitt, D. G., et al. (2003). Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K. S., & Millerand, F. (2007, January 3–6). Articulation work supporting information infrastructure design: Coordination, categorization, and assessment in practice. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Big Island, Hawaii, IEEE Computer Society, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beniger, J. R. (1986). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M., & Timmermans, S. (2000). Orders and their others: On the constitution of universalities in medical work. Configurations, 8, 31–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C. (1994). Science on the run: Information management and industrial geophysics at schlumberger, 1920–1940. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C. (2000). Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 30(5), 643–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C., Timmermans, S., & Star, S. L. (1995). Infrastructure and organizational transformation: Classifying nurses’ work. In W. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information technology and changes in organizational work (pp. 344–370). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, S. (1999). The clock of the long now: Time and responsibility: The ideas behind the world’s slowest computer. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratteteig, T. (2003). Making change: Dealing with relations between design and use. PhD Thesis, University of Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D., Jr., & Cortada, J. W. (2003). A nation transformed by information: How information has shaped the United States from Colonial times to the present (pp. 185–226). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D., & Hikino, T. (1994). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clanchy, M. T. (1993). From memory to written record, England 1066–1307 (2nd ed.). Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. (1985). Computer and dynamo: The modern productivity paradox in a not-too-distant mirror. Stanford: Center for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, A. J., & Moore, J. R. (1991). Darwin. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (2003). Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization. In T. J. Misa, P. Brey, & A. Feenberg (Eds.), The history of sociotechnical systems. Modernity and technology (pp. 185–226). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., & Knobel, C. (2007). Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. NSF Report of a Workshop on “History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures”. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49353.

  • Engestrom, Y. (1990). Learning, working, and imagining. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsutit Og.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (2007). Inclusion: The politics of difference in medical research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M., Halevy, A., & Maier, D. (2005). From databases to dataspaces: A new abstraction for information management. SIGMOD Record, 34(4), 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futrell, J., & the AC-ERE (2003, May). Environmental cyberinfrastructure (ECI): Tools for the study of complex environmental systems. http://catalog.rcls.org/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=12746364037TU.158230&profile=mid&uri=link=3100007∼!974625∼!3100001∼!3100002&aspect=subtab111&menu=search&ri=1&source=∼!anser&term=Environmental+cyberinfrastructure+%28ECI%29+tools+for+the+study+of+complex+environmental+systems.&index=PALLTI

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1987). The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., & Hatling, M. (1996). Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(4), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C. (2003). When nature goes public: The making and unmaking of bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedstrom, M., Dawes, S., Fleischhauer, C., Gray, J., Lynch, C., McCrary, V., et al. (2002). It’s about time: Research challenges in digital archiving and long-term preservation committee: NSF-DGO Report on NSF Workshop on research challenges in digital archiving. Digital Gov Program, NSF Div of Info and Intelligent Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie, J. E., Carpenter, S. R., Grimm, N. B., Gosz, J. R., & Seastedt, T. R. (2003). The US long term ecological research program. BioScience, 53(2), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 317–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P. (1989). Evolution of large technological systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 51–82). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasti, H., & Baker, K. (2004, January). Infrastructuring for the long-term: Ecological information management. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS38, IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasti, H., Baker, K. S., & Halkola, E. (2006). Enriching the notion of data curation in eScience: Data managing and information infrastructuring in the long term ecological research (LTER) network. In M. Jirotka, R. Procter, T. Rodden, & G. Bowker (Eds.), Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal. Special Issue: Collaboration in e-Research, 15(4), 321–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, S. A., & Kutchins, H. (1992). The selling of the DSM: The rhetoric of science in psychiatry. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). La Clef de Berlin et Autres Leçons d’un Amateur de Sciences. Paris: La Decouverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, K. A. (2006). Walking the tightrope: The balancing acts of a large e-Research project. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(4), 385–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W., Clarke, S., & Alexander, H. G. (1998). The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence. New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. (1993). Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnuson, J. J. (1990). Long-term ecological research and the invisible present. BioScience, 40(7), 495–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millerand, F., & Bowker, G. C. (2009). Metadata standards, trajectories and enactment in the life of an ontology. In S. L. Star & M. Lampland (Eds.), Formalizing practices: Reckoning with standards, numbers and models in science and everyday life (pp. 149–167). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, E., & Hanseth, O. (1997). Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(4), 407–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B., & O’Day, V. (1996). Intelligent agents: What we learned at the library. Libri, 46, 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSF Cyberinfrastructure Council (2006). NSF’s cyberinfrastructure vision for 21st century discovery (Version 7.1). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/od/oci/ci-v7.pdf

  • Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. M. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribes, D. (2006). Universal informatics: Building cyberinfrastructure, interoperating the geosciences. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology (Science Studies), University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribes, D., & Baker, K. S. (2007). Modes of social science engagement in community infrastructure design. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Communities and Technology, Springer, London, pp. 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribes, D., & Bowker, G. C. (2008). GEON: Organizing for interdisciplinary collaboration. In G. M. Olson, J. S. Olson, & A. Zimmerman (Eds.), Science on the internet (pp. 311–330). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, S., & Tapia, A. (2006). Always articulating: Theorizing on mobile and wireless technologies. The Information Society, 22(5), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1963). Champions for radical new inventions. Harvard Business Review, 41, 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1990). Le Contrat Naturel. Paris: Editions Françous Bourin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, A. P. (1989). The invisible technician. American Scientist, 77, 554–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. (2000). Knowledge representation: Logical, hilosophical, and computational foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1991). The sociology of the invisible: The primacy of work in the writings of Anselm Strauss. In D. Maines (Ed.), Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 265–283). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1994, October 22–26). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 94 – Transcending Boundaries), Chapel Hill, NC. ACM Press, New York, pp. 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. (1990). Information and organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1988). The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29(2), 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tort, P. (1989). La Raison Classificatoire: Les complexes Discursifs – Quinze Etudes. Paris: Aubier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, N. (1951). Cybernetics and society. New York, NY: Executive Techniques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey C. Bowker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowker, G.C., Baker, K., Millerand, F., Ribes, D. (2009). Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment. In: Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L., Allen, M. (eds) International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9789-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9789-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9788-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9789-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics