Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Walking the Tightrope: The Balancing Acts of a Large e-Research Project

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although e-Research has received much attention and acclaim in recent years, the realities of distributed collaboration still challenge even the most well-planned endeavors. This case study of an e-Research project examines the ‚balancing acts’ associated with multidisciplinary, geographically distributed, large-scale research and development work. After briefly describing the history and organizational design of this information technology and atmospheric science research project, I identify five paradoxical challenges that cannot be resolved: research versus development, harmony versus conflict, consensus versus top-down decision making, frequency and modes of communication, and fast versus slow pacing. Although collaboration and communication technologies supported the project’s management and organization, most of the complexities faced by the team were not technological in nature. From the five paradoxical challenges associated with the project, I distill three cross-cutting issues that could be relevant to other e-Research projects of this magnitude: satisfying the multiple needs of a multidisciplinary project, managing information, and engaging all participants. I identify the practical implications of these challenges and issues, specifically that organizational and low-tech solutions – not the introduction of more sophisticated technology tools – are needed to solve these challenges and to better streamline coordination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen Thomas J. (1997) Communication Networks in R&D Laboratories. In: Katz R. (eds), The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 320–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, Daniel E., et al. (2003): Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/cise/sci/reports/atkins.pdf

  • Beck Kent (2000): Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm Barry W. (1988): A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. Computer 21(5):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis Richard E. (1998): Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark Herbert H., Brennan Susan E. (1991) Grounding in Communication. In: Resnick L.B., Levine J.M., Teasley S.D. (eds), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 127–149

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings Jonathon N., Kiesler Sara (2005): Collaborative Research across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries. Social Studies of Science 35(5):703–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finholt Thomas A. (2003): Collaboratories as a New Form of Scientific Organization. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finholt Tom, Sproull Lee, Kiesler Sara (1990): Communication and Performance in Ad Hoc Task Groups. In: Galegher J., Kraut R.E., Egido C. (eds), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 291–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman Raymond A., Currall Steven C. (2003): Conflict Escalation: Dispute Exacerbating Elements of E-Mail Communication. Human Relations 56(11):1325–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner Howard (1983): Frames of Mind. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick Connie J.G. (1988): Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development. Academy of Management Journal 31(1):9–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser Barney G., Strauss Anselm L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinter, Rebecca E., James D. Herbsleb and Dewayne E. Perry (1999): The Geography of Coordination: Dealing with Distance in R&D Work. Proceedings of International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP), Phoenix, AZ, November 14–17, 1999. ACM Press, pp. 306–315

  • Grudin Jonathan (2006) Enterprise Knowledge Management and Emerging Technologies. Proceedings of the Human Computer Interaction Consortium, Winter Park, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, Mark and James D. Herbsleb (2002): What Is Chat Doing in the Workplace? Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), New Orleans, LA, November 16–20, 2002. ACM Press, pp. 1–10

  • Heath Chip, Staudenmayer Nancy (2000) Coordination Neglect: How Lay Theories of Organizing Complicate Coordination in Organizations. In: Staw B.M., Sutton R.I. (eds), Research in Organizational Behaviour. Elsevier Science Inc., Oxford, UK, pp. 153–191

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herbsleb, James D., David L. Atkins, David G. Boyer, Mark Handel and Thomas A. Finholt (2002): Introducing Instant Messaging and Chat in the Workplace. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 20–25, 2002. ACM Press, pp. 171–178

  • Hirshberg Jerry (1998): The Creative Priority: Putting Innovation to Work in Your Business. HarperBusiness, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer Roderick M. (1999) Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions. Annual Review of Psychology 50:569–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut Robert E., Egido Carmen, Galegher Jolene (1990) Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration. In: Galegher J., Kraut R.E., Egido C. (eds) Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 149–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzberg Terri R., Amabile Teresa M. (2000) From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity. Creativity Research Journal 13(3):285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb Brian (2004) Wide Open Spaces: Wikis, Ready or Not. Educause Review 39(5):36–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariani, John A. and Tom Rodden (1996): Exposing the Collaborative Nature of Data: Working Together in the PIT. 7th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), 1996. IEEE, pp. 445–450

  • Olson Gary M., Atkins Daniel E., Clauer Robert, Finholt Thomas A., Jahanian Farnam, Killeen Timothy L., Prakash Atul, Weymouth Terry (1998) The Upper Atmospheric Research Collaboratory. ACM Interactions 5(4):48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagonis William G., Cruikshank Jeffrey L. (1992) Moving Mountains: Lessons in Leadership and Logistics from the Gulf War. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton Michael Quinn (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelled Lisa Hope (1999) Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 44:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipek Volkmar, Hinrichs Joachim, Wulf Volker (2003) Sharing Expertise: Challenges for Technical Support. In: Ackerman M.S., Pipek V., Wulf V. (eds) Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 111–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, Madhu C., Dourish Paul and Pratt Wanda (2001): Coordinating Heterogeneous Work: Information and Representation in Medical Care. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW, Bonn, Germany, pp. 239–258

  • Schmidt, Kjeld (1991): Riding a Tiger, or Computer Supported Cooperative Work. In L. Bannon, M. Robinson and K. Schmidt (eds): Second European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Amsterdam, September 25–27, 1991. Springer, pp. 1–16

  • Schmidt Kjeld (2000) The Critical Role of Workplace Studies in CSCW. In: Luff P., Hindmarsh J., Heath C. (eds) Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 141–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper Michele (2003) The Rise of Social Software. NetWorker 7(3):18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker Steve, Schwarz Heinrich (1999) Meetings of the Board: The Impact of Scheduling Medium on Long Term Group Coordination in Software Development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8:175–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, Steve and Candace Sidner (1996): Email Overload: Exploring Personal Information Management of Email. Proceedings of CHI 1996, Vancouver, BC, Canada, April 13–18, 1996. ACM Press, pp. 276–283

  • Yanow, Dvora (2001): Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries. Interdisciplinary Committee on Organizational Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, March 30, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Collaboratory for Research on Electronic Work, School of Information, University of Michigan, 1075 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2112, USA

    Katherine A. Lawrence

Authors
  1. Katherine A. Lawrence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine A. Lawrence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawrence, K.A. Walking the Tightrope: The Balancing Acts of a Large e-Research Project. Comput Supported Coop Work 15, 385–411 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-006-9025-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-006-9025-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation