Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Progress in Biological Control ((PIBC,volume 6))

Abstract

Although European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar dispar) is established in the northeastern and northern midwestern parts of North America, members of the three subspecies of gypsy moth are constantly being introduced into new locations. Between 1980 and 2007, multiple eradication efforts targeting gypsy moth populations were conducted in 24 states in the US. In more recent years, eradication efforts have also slowed the westward and southern spread of gypsy moth. Of particular concern are introductions of the Asian and Japanese gypsy moths. The former has a broader host range than L. dispar dispar, and in both strains females are capable of flight. Consequently, the threshold for initiating an eradication effort against Asian and Japanese gypsy moth populations is much lower than it is for European gypsy moth. In some cases, the detection of as few as one Asian gypsy moth could trigger an eradication effort. A critical component that enables eradication projects against gypsy moth to be successful is the availability of a sensitive monitoring tool that can detect very low density, newly-establishing gypsy moth populations. The primary method for eradication of gypsy moth today is use of the HD-1 strain of Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki (Btk). For eradication programs, aerial applications of Btk are generally applied 2–3 times when early instars are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander DG (1992) Washington State Department of Agriculture 1992 Asian Gypsy Moth program. In: Proc 1992 Annual Gypsy Moth Review, 2–5 Nov 1994, Indianapolis, Indiana. pp 108–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranchikov YN (1989) Ecological basis of the evolution of host relationships in Eurasian gypsy moth populations. In: Wallner WE, McManus KA (eds) Proc Lymantriidae: A comparison of features of new and old world tussock moths. USDA Forest Service, Gen Tech Rpt NE-123, Broomall, PA. pp 319–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranchikov YN, Montgomery ME (1994) Tree suitability for Asian, European and American populations of gypsy moth. USDA Forest Service, Gen Tech Rpt NE-188:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell J (1994) British Columbia report. In: Proc 1994 Annual Gypsy Moth Review, 30 Oct – 2 Nov 1994, Portland, Oregon. pp 153–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Beroza M, Knipling EF (1972) Gypsy moth control with the sex attractant pheromone. Science 177:19–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bierl BA, Beroza M, Collier CW (1970) Potent sex attractant of the gypsy moth: its isolation, identification and synthesis. Science 170:87–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanowicz SM, Wallner WE, Bell J, Odell TM, Harrison RG (1993) Asian gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in North America: Evidence from molecular data. Ann Entomol Soc Am 86:710–715

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • British Columbia Ministry of Forest & Range (2007) History of gypsy moth infestations in British Columbia. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/gypsymoth/history.htm [accessed 18 February 2008]

  • Burgess AF (1930) The gipsy [sic] moth and the brown-tail moth. United States Department of Agriculture Farmers’ Bulletin 1623

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell RW, Sloan RJ (1977) Forest stand responses to defoliation by the gypsy moth. For Sci Monogr 19:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsten DL, Garcia R, Lorraine H (1989) Eradication as a pest management tool: Concepts and contexts. In: Dahlsten DL, Garcia R (eds) Eradication of exotic pests: Analysis with case histories. Yale Univ Press, New Haven, CT. pp 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • de Amorim GV, Whittome B, Shore B, Levin DB (2001) Identification of Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki strain HD1-like bacteria from environmental and human samples after aerial spraying of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada with Foray 48B. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1035–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doane CC, McManus ME (1981) The gypsy moth: Research toward integrated pest management. US Dept Agric For Serv Gen Tech Bull 1584

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkinton JS, Liebhold AM (1990) Population dynamics of gypsy moth in North America. Annu Rev Entomol 35:571–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbush EH, Fernald CH (1896) The gypsy moth. Wright and Potter, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansner DA, Herrick OW (1984) Guides for estimating forest stand losses to gypsy moth. Northern J Appl For 1:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia LE (1993) Exotic gypsy moth introduction at Sunny Point, North Carolina. Proc 1993 Annual Gypsy Moth Review, Nov, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. pp 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner KJ, Slavicek JM (1996) Identification and characterization of a RAPD-PCR marker for distinguishing Asian and North American gypsy moths. Ins Mol Biol 5:81–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld R (1989) Dynamics of biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick OW, Gansner DA (1987) Mortality risks for forest trees threatened with gypsy moth infestation. USDA Forest Service, Res Note NE-338

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KJR, Bai BB, Rogg H (2007) Gypsy moth detection and eradication programs in Oregon – 2007. In: Proc 2007 Annual Gypsy Moth Review, 29 Oct–1 Nov, Sheperdstown, West Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Keena M (1996) Comparison of the hatch of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) eggs from Russia and the United States after exposure to different temperatures and durations of low temperature. Ann Entomol Soc Amer 89:564–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuschner WA, Young JA, Walden SA, Ravlin FW (1996) Potential benefits of slowing the gypsy moth’s spread. South J Appl For 20:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebhold AM, Bascompte J (2003) The Allee effect, stochastic dynamics and the eradication of alien species. Ecol Lett 6:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebhold AM, Halverson JA, Elmes GA (1992) Gypsy moth invasion in North America: a quantitative analysis. J Biogeogr 19:513–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebhold AM, Work TT, McCullough DG, Cavey JF (2006) Airline baggage as a pathway for alien insect species entering the United States. Amer Entomol 52:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludsin SA, Wolfe AD (2001) Biological invasion theory: Darwin’s contributions from The Origin of Species. Bioscience 51:780–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough DG, Work TT, Cavey JF, Liebhold AM, Marshall D (2006) Interceptions of nonindigenous plant pests at U.S. ports of entry and border crossings over a 17 year period. Biol Inv 8:611–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden MW, McManus ME (1991) An insect out of control? The potential for spread and establishment of the gypsy moth in new forest areas in the United States. In: Baranchikov YN, Mattson WJ, Hain FP, Payne TL (eds) Forest insect guilds: patterns of interaction with host trees. USDA Forest Service, Gen Tech Rpt NE-153. pp 172–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller GH, Marler RL, McCay RE, White WB (1977) Economic analysis of the gypsy moth problem in the Northeast. III. Impacts on homeowners and managers of recreation areas. USDA Forest Service, Res Paper NE-360

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JH (2003) Eradication: Is it ecologically, financially, environmentally, and realistically possible? In: Rapport DJ, Lasley WL, Rolston DE, Nielsen NO, Qualset CO, Damania AB (eds) Managing for healthy ecosystems. Lewis Publ., Boca Raton. pp 533–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JH, Rothman LD (1995) Field experiments to study regulation of fluctuating populations. In: Cappuccino N, Price PW (eds) Population dynamics: New approaches and synthesis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. pp 229–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JH, Savoie A, Van Randen E (1998) Eradication and pest management. Annu Rev Entomol 43:471–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers JH, Simberloff D, Kuris AM, Carey JR (2000) Eradication revisited: Dealing with exotic species. Tr Ecol Evol 15:316–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver A (1994) “Do something” In: Proc 1994 Annual Gypsy Moth Review, 30 Oct-2 Nov 1994, Portland, Oregon. pp 150–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Department of Agriculture (2006) Gypsy moth detections increase in Oregon this year. http://www.oregon.gov/ODA/news/061025gypsy_moth.shtml [accessed 19 February 2008]

  • Payne BR, White WB, McCay RE, McNichols RR (1973) Economic analysis of the gypsy moth problem in the Northeast. II. Applied to residential property. USDA Forest Service, Res Paper NE-285

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogue MG, Schaefer PW (2007) A review of selected species of Lymantria (Hübner) [1819] (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Lymantriinae) from subtropical and temperate regions of Asia, including three new species, some potentially invasive to North America. USDA Forest Service FHTET-2006-07

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasher D, Mastro VC (1994) Genotype analyses of 1994 port specimens. Proc 1994 Annual Gypsy Moth Review, 30 Oct–2 Nov, Portland, Oregon. pp 61–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon R, Dubois N, McLane W (1994) Bacillus thuringiensis for managing gypsy moth: a review. USDA Forest Service, National Center of Forest Health Management. FHM-NC-01-94

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon RC, Podgwaite J, Zerillo R (1996) Gypchek – the gypsy moth nucleopolyhedrosis virus product. USDA Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, FHTET-96-16

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman AM, Scriber JM (2000) Competition between the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, and the northern tiger swallowtail, Papilio canadensis: interactions mediated by host plant chemistry, pathogens, and parasitoids. Oecologia 125:218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reineke A, Zebitz CPW (1999) Suitability of polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for identification of different gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) genotypes in CentralEurope. Ann Entomol Soc Amer 92:737–741

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Pitcairn J (2002) When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal? In: Veitch D, Clout M (eds) Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, pp 249–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley CV, Vasey G (1870) Imported insects and native American insects. Amer Entomol 2:110–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EA (2008) Decision-support system for the gypsy moth Slow-the-Spread Program. http://da.ento.vt.edu/[accessed 5 March 2008]

  • Schreiber DE, Garner KJ, Slavicek JM (1997) Identification of three randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction markers for distinguishing Asian and North American gypsy moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Ann Entomol Soc Amer 90:667–674

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharov AA (2004) The bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Risk Anal 24:879–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharov AA, Liebhold AM (1998) Model of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecol Appl 8:1170–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharov AA, Leonard DS, Liebhold AM, Clemens NS (2002) Evaluation of preventive treatments in low-density gypsy moth populations. J Econ Entomol 95:1205–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada N, Kawasaki K, Takeda Y (1995) Modeling stratified diffusion in biological invasions. Am Nat 146:229–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Gibbons L. (2004) Now you see them, now. you don’t! Biol Invasions 6:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear RJ (2005) The great gypsy moth war: a history of the first campaign in Massachusetts to eradicate the gypsy moth, 1890–1901. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • South M (1994) North Carolina gypsy moth program: 1994 overview. In: Proc 1994 Annual Gypsy Moth Review, 30 Oct-2 Nov 1994, Portland, Oregon. pp 304–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe K, Reardon R, Tcheslavskaia K, Leonard D, Mastro V (2006) A review of the use of mating disruption to manage gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.). US Dept Agric For Health Tech Ent Team 2006-13, Morgantown, WV. 76 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin PC, Blackburn LM (2007) Slow the spread: a national program to manage the gypsy moth. USDA Forest Service, Gen Tech Rep NRS-6, Newtown Square, PA. 109 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin PC, Liebhold AM, Roberts EA (2007) Comparison of methods for estimating the spread of a non-indigenous species. J Biogeography 34:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin PC, Sharov AA, Liebhold AM, Leonard DS, Roberts EA, Learn MR (2004) Management of the gypsy moth through a decision algorithm under the Slow the Spread Project. Amer Entomol 50:200–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuthill RW, Canada AT, Wilcock K, Etkind PH, O’Dell TM, Shama SK (1984) An epidemiological study of gypsy moth rash. Amer J Pub Health 74:799–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA APHIS (Animal Plant Health Inspection Service) (2000) Importation of gypsy moth host material from Canada. Fed Reg 65:38171–38177

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA APHIS (Animal Plant Health Inspection Service) (2001) Gypsy moth program manual. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/domestic/[accessed 5 March 2008]

  • USDA APHIS (Animal Plant Health Inspection Service) (2003) Asian gypsy moth. http://www. aphis.usda.gov/lpa/pubs/fsheet_faq_notice/fs_phasiangm.html [accessed 18 February 2008]

  • USDA Forest Service (1995) Gypsy moth management in the United States: a cooperative approach. Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service (1996) 1996 Forest Insect and Disease Conditions for the Southern Region. http://www.digitalarborist.com/96conditions/[accessed 26 March 2008]

  • USDA Forest Service (1997) 1997 Forest Insect and Disease Conditions for the Southern Region. http://www.digitalarborist.com/97conditions/[accessed 26 March 2008]

  • USDA Forest Service (2008) Gypsy Moth Digest. http://na.fs.fed.us/fhp/gm [accessed 3 March 2008]

  • Valent Biosciences Corporation (1998) Foray® Dipel®: Forestry technical manual. Valent Biosciences Corp., Libertyville, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallner WE, Humble LM, Levin RE, Baranchikov YN, Carde RT (1995) Response of adult Lymantriid moths to illumination devices in the Russian Far East. J Econ Entomol 88:337–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington State Dept Agriculture (2007) History of Asian gypsy moth in Washington State. http://agr.wa.gov/PlantsInsects/InsectPests/GypsyMoth/History/docs/HistoryOfAsianGM.pdf [accessed 18 February 2008]

  • Washington State Dept. Health (Environmental Health Programs) (2001) Report of Health Surveillance Activities: Aerial Spraying for Asian Gypsy Moth – May 2000 Seattle, WA. Office of Environmental Health and Safety, Olympia, WA. http://www.doh.wa.gov/ ehp/Pest/AsianGypsyMothReport. PDF [accessed 18 February 2008]

  • Webb RE, Ridgway RL, Thorpe KW, Tatman KM, Wieber AM, Venables L (1991) Development of a specialized gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) management program for suburban parks. J Econ Entomol 84:1320–1328

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmire SL, Tobin PC (2006) Persistence of invading gypsy moth colonies in the United States. Oecologia 147:230–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Work TT, McCullough DG, Cavey JF, Komsa R (2005) Arrival rate of nonindigenous insect species into the United States through foreign trade. Biol Inv 7:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngs L (1985) Panel discussion: Eradication – B. t. In: Proc 1985 Annual Gypsy Moth Review, 18–21 Nov 1985, Columbus, Ohio. pp 119–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlotina MA, Mastro VC, Elkinton JS, Leonard DE (1999) Dispersal tendencies of neonate larvae of Lymantria mathura and the Asian form of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Environ Entomol 28:240–245

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hajek, A.E., Tobin, P.C. (2009). North American Eradications of Asian and European Gypsy Moth. In: Hajek, A.E., Glare, T.R., O’Callaghan, M. (eds) Use of Microbes for Control and Eradication of Invasive Arthropods. Progress in Biological Control, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8560-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics