Abstract
Despite the substantial impacts of nonindigenous plant pests and weeds, relatively little is known about the pathways by which these organisms arrive in the U.S. One source of such information is the Port Information Network (PIN) database, maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) since 1984. The PIN database is comprised of records of pests intercepted by APHIS personnel during inspections of travelers’ baggage, cargo, conveyances and related items arriving at U.S. ports of entry and border crossings. Each record typically includes the taxonomic identify of the pest, its country of origin, and information related to the commodity and interception site. We summarized more than 725,000 pest interceptions recorded in PIN from 1984 to 2000 to examine origins, interception sites and modes of transport for nonindigenous insects, mites, mollusks, nematodes, plant pathogens and weeds. Roughly 62% of intercepted pests were associated with baggage, 30% were associated with cargo and 7% were associated with plant propagative material. Pest interceptions occurred most commonly at airports (73%), U.S.-Mexico land border crossings (13%) and marine ports (9%). Insects dominated the database, comprising 73 to 84% of the records annually, with the orders Homoptera, Lepidoptera and Diptera collectively accounting for over 75% of the insect records. Plant pathogens, weeds and mollusks accounted for 13, 7 and 1.5% of all pest records, respectively, while mites and nematodes comprised less than 1% of the records. Pests were intercepted from at least 259 different locations. Common origins included Mexico, Central and South American countries, the Caribbean and Asia. Within specific commodity pathways, richness of the pest taxa generally increased linearly with the number of interceptions. Application of PIN data for statistically robust predictions is limited by nonrandom sampling protocols, but the data provide a valuable historical record of the array of nonindigenous organisms transported to the U.S. through international trade and travel.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BP Bierne, Biological control attempts by introductions against pest insects in the field in Canada. Canadian Entomologist 107 (1975) 225-236
Cavey JF (2003) Mitigating introductions of invasive plant pests in the United States. In: Ruiz GM and Carlton JT (eds) Invasive Species, Vectors and Management Strategies, pp 350–361. Island Press, Washington, D.C. USA. 518 pp
CountryReports.org (2005) List of countries in the world. http://www.countryreports.org. Accessed January 2005
F Courchamp, T Clutton-Brock and B Grenfell, Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14 (1999) 405-410
MJ Crawley, The population biology of invaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 314 (1986) 71-713
DL Dahlsten, R Garcia and H Lorraine, Eradication as a pest management tool: concepts and contexts. In: R Garcia (ed.) Eradication of Exotic Pests. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press (1989) pp. 3-15
Doggett LR (1997) Tourism’s role in a changing economy. ITA Office of Travel and Tourism Industries. http://tinet.ita.doc.gov/about/index.html. Accessed October 1999
FS Grevstad, Experimental invasions using biological control introductions: the influence of release size on the chance of population establishment. Biological Invasions 1 (1999a) 313-323
FS Grevstad, Factors influencing the chance of population establishment: implications for release strategies in biocontrol. Ecological Applications 9 (1999b) 1439-1447
RA Haack, Intercepted Scolytidae (Coleoptera) at United States ports of entry: 1985–2000. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 6 (2001) 253-282
RA Haack and JF Cavey, Insects intercepted on wood articles at ports-of-entry in the United States: 1985–1996. Newsletter of the Michigan Entomology Society 42 (1997) 1-5
RA Haack, KR Law, VC Mastro, HS Ossenbruggen and BJ Raimo, New York’s battle with the Asian long-horned beetle. Journal of Forestry 95 (1997) 11-15
RW Hall and LE Ehler, Rate of establishment of natural enemies in classical biological control. Bulletin of Entomological Society of America 25 (1979) 280-282
KR Hopper and RT Roush, Mate finding, dispersal, number released and the success of biological control introductions. Ecological Entomology 18 (1993) 321-331
RP Kahn, Exclusion as a plant disease control strategy. Annual Review of Phytopathology 29 (1991) 219-246
Kiritani K and Yamamura K (2003) Exotic insects and their pathways for invasion. In: Mitigating introductions of invasive plant pests in the United States, In: Ruiz GM and Carlton JT (eds) Invasive Species, Vectors and Management Strategies, pp 44–67. Island Press, Washington, DC 518 pp
JC Lenteren Van, Frequency and consequences of insect invasions. Plant Micro Biotechnological Research Series 4 (1995) 30-43
MA Lewis and P Kareiva, Allee dynamics and the spread of invading organisms. Theoretical Population Biology 43 (1993) 141-158
A Liebhold and J Bascompte, The Allee effect, stochastic dynamics and the eradication of alien species. Ecology Letters 6 (2003) 133-140
AM Liebhold, WL MacDonald, D Bergdahl and VC Mastro, Invasion by exotic forest pests – a threat to forest ecosystems. Forest Science 41 (1995) 1-49
Liebhold AM, Work TT, McCullough DG and Cavey JF (2006) Airline baggage as a pathway for alien species entering the United States. American Entomologist. Accepted
RN Mack, D Simberloff, WM Lonsdale, H Evans, M Clout and FA Bazzaz, Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecological Applications 10 (2000) 689-710
D Marshall, TT Work and JF Cavey, Invasion pathways of Karnal Bunt of wheat into the United States. Plant Disease 87 (2003) 999-1003
JH Myers, DS Simberloff, AM Kuris and JR Carey, Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15 (2000) 316-320
P Niemela and WJ Mattson, Invasion of North American forests by European phytophagous insects. BioScience 46 (1996) 741-753
National Plant Board. (1999) Safeguarding American plant resources: a stakeholder review of the APHIS-PPQ safeguarding system. Published by USDA APHIS PPQ (U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Pest and Quarantine). 132 pp
Predicting Invasions of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests. Washington, D.C., USA: National Academy Press (2002).
D Pimental, L Lach, R Zuniga and D Morrison, Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience 50 (2000) 53-65
HI Rainwater, Agricultural insect pest hitchhikers on aircraft. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 1962 (1963) 303-309
GS Ridley, J Bain, LS Bulman, MA Dick and MK Kay, Threats to New Zealand’s indigenous forests from exotic pathogens and pests. Wellington, NZ: Department of Conservation Sciences for Conservation (2000).
RI Sailer, Our immigrant insect fauna. Entomological Society of American Bulletin 24 (1978) 3-11
DS Simberloff, Eradication of island invasives: practical actions and results achieved. Trends in Ecological Evolution 16 (2001) 273-274
TRE Southwood, Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. London: Chapman and Hall (1984).
MA Stanaway, MP Zalucki, PlS Gillespies, CM Rodriguez and GV Maynard, Pest risk assessment of insects in sea cargo containcers. Australian Journal of Entomology 40 (2001) 180-192
US Census Bureau. (2001) Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2001. Washington, D.C.
USDA APHIS PPQ, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine. (2004) Federal noxious weeds. http://plants.usda.gov/cgi/bin/federal/noxious.cgi Accessed October 2004.
USDA APHIS-FS, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service and Forest Service. (2000) Pest risk assessment for importation of solid wood packing materials in the United States. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/pra/swpm. Accessed April 2001
USDA/ERS/FATUS, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States. (2001) Online database of U.S. trade statistics. http://www.ers.usda.gov/db/fatus. Accessed March 2002
USDA, U.S. Dept of Agriculture. Federal Register. (2004) Part 360 – Noxious weed regulations. 7 CFR Ch. III (1–1-04 edition). pp 498–500
USDA FAS, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. (2004) http://www.fas.usda.gov/htp/Presentations/2004/veggies/2004%Asparagus. ppt. Accessed October 2004
PM Vitousek, CM D’Antonio, LL Loope and R Westbrooks, Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84 (1996) 468-478
U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (U.S. OTA), U.S. Congress. (1993) Harmful nonindigenous species in the United States. OTA-F-565. U.S. Congress Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C. USA.
DS Wilcove, D Rothstein, J Dubow, A Phillips and E Losos, Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48 (1998) 607-615
M Williamson and A Fitter, The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77 (1996) 1661-1666
TT Work, DG McCullough, JF Cavey and R Komsa, Arrival rate of nonindigenous species into the United States through foreign trade. Biological Invasions 7 (2005) 323-332
WorldAtlas.com. 2005. http://www.worldatlas.com/nations/html. Accessed January 2005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCullough, D.G., Work, T.T., Cavey, J.F. et al. Interceptions of Nonindigenous Plant Pests at US Ports of Entry and Border Crossings Over a 17-year Period. Biol Invasions 8, 611–630 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-1798-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-1798-4