Skip to main content

The State, the Market and the Institutional Estate: Revisiting Contemporary Authority Relations in Higher Education

  • Chapter
Higher Education

Part of the book series: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 23))

This paper examines a contemporary case of postsecondary restructuring using the central elements of Burton Clark’s “triangle of coordination,” a prevalent model of authority relations in higher education. The paper reviews research and scholarship on authority relations and on the three main elements of Clark’s triangle, the State, the market and the academic oligarchy. The paper presents data from a case of postsecondary restructuring in Virginia and the factors shaping that case in the period 1995-2005. The analysis of the case suggests that the State, the market and the institutional estate remain quite influential in contemporary contests over postsecondary authority, with the State more influential than some previous research would suggest. The paper concludes that authority relations can be more fully understood by building on Clark’s triangle through attention to the contemporary complexity of the dynamic relationship between the State, the market and the institutional estate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altbach, P. G. (2001, May 11). Why higher education is not a global commodity. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, B20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrozas, D. (1998). The university as a public sphere. Canadian Journal of Communication, 23(1), 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. S. (2001, March/April). The complex relations between the academy and industry: Views from the literature. Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 226–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W., & Oseguera, L. (2004, Spring). The declining “equity of American higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baez, B., & Slaughter, S. (2001). Academic freedom and federal courts: The legitimation of the conservative entrepreneurial state. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 16(3), 73–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. V. (1971). Power and Conflict in the University: Research in the Sociology of Complex Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. G., & Chronister, J. L. (2001). Teaching Without Tenure. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, C. W. (1990). Universities and the Capitalist State: Corporate Liberalism and the Reconstruction of American Higher Education, 1894–1928. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1971). Statewide Coordination in Higher Education. Washington, DC: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1990). Public universities and state governments. Educational Record Winter: 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1988). How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, P. (2006, January/ February). Restructuring relationships in Virginia. Change, 38(1), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the Marketplace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The Shape of the River. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., Kurzweil, M. A., & Tobin, E. M. (2005). Equity and Excellence in American Higher Education. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in Capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, W. L. (2001). Balancing the state, markets and civil society in education reform: Trends and issues in England and the United States. In H.-D. Meyer, & W. L. Boyd (Eds.) Education Between State, Markets, and Civil Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breneman, D. W., & Finn, C. E. (1978). Public Policy and Private Higher Education. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breneman, D. W., & Kneedler, H. L. (2006). Negotiating a new relationship with the state: The Virginia experience. In R. L. Clark, & M. d’Ambrosio (Eds.), The New Balancing Act in the Business of Higher Education. Washington, DC: TIAA-CREF Institute Series on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breneman, D. W., Pusser, B., & Turner, S. E. (2006). The contemporary provision of for-profit higher education: Mapping the competitive environment. In D. W. Breneman, B. Pusser, & S. E. Turner (Eds.), Earnings from Learning: The Rise of For-Profit Universities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buer, T. S., Burnett, P. J., & Cabaniss, P. Q. (2007). Autonomy for Mr. Jefferson’s University and Its Brethren: The Process, Potential and Pitfalls of the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act of 2005. Unpublished manuscript. Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdman, P. (2004, Spring). Has the state become an albatross? National CrossTalk, 12(2), 1, 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. C. (2005). The many faces of accountability. In J. C. Burke, & Associates (Eds.), Achieving Accountability in Higher Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2006). The university and the public good. Thesis Eleven, 84, 7–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (1984). The State & Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M., & Levin, H. M. (1985). Schooling and Work in the Democratic State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M., Castells, M., Cohen, S. S., & Cardoso, F. H. (1993). The New Global Economy in the Information Age: Reflections on Our Changing World. University Park: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casteen, J. T., III. (2005, April 12). Letter from President Casteen. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia, Office of the President.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronicle of Higher Education (2006, August 25). Almanac, LIII(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, Markets and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The HigherEducation System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1993). The problem of complexity in modern higher education. In S. Rothblatt, & B. Wittrock (Eds.), The European and American University Since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C. E. (1998). Lobbying for Higher Education: How Colleges and Universities Influence Federal Policy. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couturier, L. K. (2006). Checks and balances at work: The restructuring of Virginia’s public higher education system. National Center Report #06–3. San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. (1998). Universities and Globalization: Critical Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, J. (2006). Institutional autonomy and state-level accountability: Loosely coupled governance and the public good. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Governance and the Public Good. (pp. 133–155). Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D., & Soo, M. (2004). Transparency and quality in higher education markets. In P. N. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? (pp. 61–85). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The ‘iron cage’ revisited: Isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K., & Bakia, M. (2000). The new economic role of the community college: Origins and prospects. CCRC Brief. Teachers College, NY: Community College Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, A. C. (2003, March). From access to outcome equity: Revitalizing the democratic mission of the community college. Annals, American Academy of Political & Social Science, 586, 92–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D. D. (2003, January/March). Accountability, democratic theory, and higher education. Educational Policy, 17(1), 60–79. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G. (2000). Tuition Rising: Why College Costs So Much. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. (2004). Higher education, internationalization, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory. Higher Education, 47, 361–382. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engell, J., & Dangerfield, A. (2005). Saving Higher Education in the Age of Money. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, H., Henig, J., & Hamnett, C. (1999). Shrinking the State: The Political Underpinnings of Privatization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, C. E. (2005). For-profit degree granting colleges. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, XX. New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (Translated from the French by A. Sheridan.) New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M. (1997). The state of affirmative action at the threshold of a new millenium. In M. Garcia (Ed.), Affirmative Action’s Testament of Hope. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (2004). Knowledge and Money. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, B., & Andrews, K. (2004, October 20). UVA staffers mull charter plan. Daily Progress. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://suuva.org/articles/106/uva-staffers-mull-charter-plan.

  • Giroux, H. A. (1983) Critical Theory and Educational Practice. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladieux, L. E., & Wolanin, T. R. (1976). Congress and the Colleges. Toronto, ON: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenny, L. A. (1959). Autonomy of Public Colleges; The Challenge of Coordination. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P. J., & Pusser, B. (1999). University restructuring: The role of economic and political contexts. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, XIV. New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, N. W. (2004). Faculty involvement in system-wide governance. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Competing Conceptions of Academic Governance: Negotiating the Perfect Storm. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, S. B. (1996, September/October). The higher education act of 1992: Skills, constraints, and the politics of higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67(5), 498–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1980). The Rationale for Exempting Nonprofit Organizations from Corporate Income Taxation. Yale Law Journal, 91, 54–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C. (1990). Putting power into university governance. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E. (2004). State oversight of academia. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Governing Academia (pp. 49–67). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hincker, L. (2005, January 30). Chartered universities would improve education, quality of life. [Letter to the Editor] The Free Lance-Star. Fredricksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, E. (2000). The governance of higher education. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, XV. New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, R., & Metzger, W. (1955). The Development of Academic Freedom in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, E., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (1986). The Nonprofit Enterprise in Market Economics. New York: Harwood Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B. (2003). Marketisation in higher education, Clark’s triangle and the essential ingredients of markets. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(2), 110–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G. (2004). A growing quaintness: Traditional governance in the markedly new realm of U.S. higher education. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Competing Conceptions of Academic Governance: Negotiating the Perfect Storm. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (2001). The Uses of the University, 5th Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C., & Gade, M. L. (1989). The Guardians: Boards of Trustees of American Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC: AGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirp, D. L. (2003). Shakespeare, Einstein and the Bottom Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, D. W., & Berdahl, R. O. (2006). More Freedoms, More Controls Mark Restructuring in Virginia: A Case Study. Unpublished manuscript. Williamsburg, VA: The College of William and Mary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. L., & Johnson, G. P. (1974). The market model and higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 45, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. S. (2001). Globalizing the Community College: Strategies for Change in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. S., Kater, S., & Wagoner, R. L. (2006). Community College Faculty: At Work in the New Economy. New York: Palgrave MacMillin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longanecker, D. A. (2006). The “new” new challenge of governance by governing boards. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Governance and the Public Good (pp. 95–115). Albany: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowen, R. S. (1997). Creating the Cold War University. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1998). On the contested nature of the public good. In W. W. Powell, & E. S. Clemens (Eds.), Private Action and the Public Good. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (1997). Markets in Education. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and markets in higher education: A ‘Glonacal’ analysis. Journal of Education Policy Futures, 2(2), 175–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2006). Putting ‘public’ back in the public university. Thesis Eleven, 84, 44–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The Enterprise University. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W. F. (2004). Markets in higher education: Do they promote internal efficiency? In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, S. E. (1995). Old school ties: Financial aid coordination and governance of higher education. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 28, 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millett, J. D. (1984). Conflict in Higher Education: State Government Coordination Versus Institutional Independence. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. (1990). Political institutions: The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 6, 213–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K. R., & McConnell, T. R. (1978). Sharing Authority Effectively. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. R., & van Vught, F. (1991). Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship Between Governance and Higher Education in Western Europe. Oxford/New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1991). The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 142, 230–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivas, M. A. (2004). The rise of nonlegal legal influences on higher education. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Governing Academia: Who is in Charge at the Modern University? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Gods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, R. M. (2004). University governance and academic freedom. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Competing Conceptions of Academic Governance: Negotiating the Perfect Storm. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordorika, I. (2003). Power and Politics in University Governance: Organization and Change at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordorika, I., & Pusser, B. (2007). La máxima casa de estudios: The Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México as a state-building university. In P. G. Altbach, & J. Balan (Eds.), Empires of Knowledge and Development: The Roles of Research Universities in Developing Countries. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, A. (1997). How to survive in postindustrial environments: Adam Smith’s advice for today’s colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education, 68(5), 483–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. D. (1997). Power and Politics: Federal Higher Education Policymaking in the 1990s. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. A. (2003, January/March). The role of politically motivated subsidies on university research activities. Educational Policy, 17(1), 12–37. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (2004). Citizen-consumers, social markets and the reform of public services. Policy Futures in Education, 2(3&4), 621–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (1998). Universities as creators and retailers of intellectual property: Life-sciences research and commercial development. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), To Profit or Not to Profit. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B. (2003). Beyond Baldridge: Extending the political model of higher education governance. Educational Policy, 17(1), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B. (2004). Burning Down the House: Politics, Governance and Affirmative Action at the University of California. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B. (2006). Reconsidering higher education and the public good: The role of public spheres. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Governance and the Public Good. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B., & Doane, D. J. (2001, September-October). Public purpose and private enterprise: The contemporary organization of postsecondary education. Change, 33(5), 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B., & Turner, S. (2004). Nonprofit and for-profit governance in higher education. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Governing Academia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B., & Wolcott, D. A. (2006). A crowded lobby: Nonprofit and for-profit universities in the emerging politics of higher education. In D. Breneman et al. (Eds.), Earnings from Learning: The Rise of For-Profit Universities. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S. L. (2006). Playing the board game: An empirical analysis of university trustee and corporate board interlocks. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 747–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabban, D. M. (2001). Academic freedom, individual or institutional? Academe, 87(6), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensburg, I. L. (1996). Collective Identity and Public Policy: From Resistance to Reconstruction in South Africa, 1986–1995. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. L. (1992). Beyond ‘the State’: Interorganizational relations and state apparatus in postsecondary education. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. L. (1998). Managed Professionals: Unionized Faculty and Restructuring Academic Labor. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G., & Rhoads, R. (2003). The public discourse of U.S. graduate employee unions: social movement identities, ideologies, and strategies. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, R. A., & Torres, C. A. (2006). The global economy, the state, social movements and the university: Concluding remarks and agenda for action. In R. A. Rhoads, & C. A. Torres (Eds.), The University, State, and Market: The Political Economy of Globalization in the Americas (pp. 321–351). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1979). On Lies, Secrets and Silences, Selected Prose: 1966–78. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabloff, P. L. (1997). Another reason why state legislatures will continue to restrict Public university autonomy. The Review of Higher Education, 20(2), 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J. D. (1999). Funding Science in America: Congress, Universities, and the Politics of the Academic Pork Barrel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHEV (2005, July). State Council of Higher Education for Virginia. 2005–2006 Tuition and Fees at Virginia’s State-Supported Colleges & Universities. Richmond, VA: State Council of Higher Education for Virginia. Retrieved from http://www.schev. edu/Reportstats/2005–06 Tuition&FeesReport.pdf (August 15, 2005).

  • Schmidt, P. (2001, January 12). Texas governor proposes radical shift in college financing. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schugurensky, D. (2006). The political economy of higher education in the time of global markets: Whither the social responsibility of the university? In R. A. Rhoads, & C. A. Torres (Eds.), The University, State, and Market: The Political Economy of Globalization in the Americas. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1976 [1942]). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American Faculty: The Restructuring of Academic Work and Careers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1947). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (1988). Academic freedom and the state. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 241–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (1990). The Higher Learning and High Technology: Dynamics of Higher Education Policy Formation. Albany: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic Capitalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. L. (2004). Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (2004). The Second Bill of Rights. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, P. N. (2006, March). Markets in higher education: Can we still learn from economics’ founding fathers? Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.4.06. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (1999). Building the Responsive Campus: Creating High Performance Colleges and Universities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (2004). A perfect storm: Turbulence in higher education. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Competing Conceptions of Academic Governance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (2006). Trust and the Public Good: Examining the Cultural Conditions of Academic Work. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., & Hentschke, G. C. (2007). New Players, Different Game: Understanding the Rise of For-Profit Colleges and Universities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1976). ‘Elite higher education’: An endangered species? Minerva, 14, 355–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1996). Trust, markets and accountability in higher education: A comparative perspective. Higher Education Policy, 9(4), 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.Va. Faculty Senate. (2005, February 9). Statement of the University of Virginia Faculty Senate on Restructuring Public Higher Education in Virginia. Retrieved May 14, 2007, from http://www.virginia.edu/facultysenate/charterdec1105.html.

  • Va. Code § 23–38.88 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzi, K. D. (2006). U.Va.’s ‘Grand Experiment’ Begins. Retrieved November 28, 2006, from http://www.virginia.edu/insideuva/experiment.html.

  • Veblen, T. (1918). The Higher Learning in America; A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Men. New York: Sagamore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veysey, L. R. (1965). The Emergence of the American University. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2005, March 31). Governor Warner announces amendments to higher education restructuring bill. From the Office of the Governor. Retrieved January 7, 2008, from http://www.virginia.edu/restructuring/warner033105.html.

  • Warner, M. (2006, January/February). In P. Blake, Restructuring Relationships in Virginia. Change, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, H. N. (1983). Legalization, expertise and participation: Strategies of compensatory legitimation in educational policy. Comparative Education Review, 27L, 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R. (1984). The congressional-bureaucratic system: A principal agent perspective. Public Choice, 44, 147–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1988). The Nonprofit Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). The nonprofit mission and its financing: Growing links between nonprofits and the rest of the economy. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, J. V. (2006). Rethinking state governance of higher education. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Governance and the Public Good. (pp. 51–72). Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. D. (2004). Tiebout competition versus political competition on a university campus. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Governing Academia (pp. 139–161). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L. (1965). Emerging Patterns in American Higher Education. Washington, DC: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G. (1997). Why can’t a college be more like a firm? In J. Meyerson (Ed.), New Thinking on Higher Education. Aspen, CO: Futures Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G., Carbone, J. C., & Lewis, E. G. (1998). What’s Been Happening to Higher Education: A Reference Manual, 1986–87 to 1994–95. The Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumeta, W. (2001). Public policy and accountability in higher education: Lessons from the past and present for the new millennium. In D. Heller (Ed.), The States and Public Higher Education Policy: Affordability, Access, and Accountability. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pusser, B. (2008). The State, the Market and the Institutional Estate: Revisiting Contemporary Authority Relations in Higher Education. In: Smart, J.C. (eds) Higher Education. Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6959-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics