Skip to main content

Setting the Stage: A Conceptual Framework for Examining and Developing Tasks for Mathematics Teacher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Constructing Knowledge for Teaching Secondary Mathematics

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teacher Education ((MTEN,volume 6))

Abstract

This book is about tasks that teacher educators might use with prospective or practicing secondary mathematics teachers. There is a substantial literature that has established the critical role that tasks play in the teaching and learning process for school mathematics classes. Kilpatrick et al. (2001), for example, claim that the quality of teaching depends on whether teachers select cognitively demanding tasks, and whether these tasks unfold in the classroom in ways that allow the students to elaborate on the tasks and learn through those tasks. The basic argument is that it is through and around tasks that teachers and students communicate and learn mathematical ideas, so the tasks used by the teachers become the mediating tools. Christiansen and Walther (1986), drawing on the work of Leont’ev (1978), argued that the tasks set and the associated activity form the basis of the interaction between teaching and learning. Other authors who have similarly emphasized the critical role of tasks in creating learning opportunities for school students as well as the significant influences tasks have on what students actually learn include Stein and Lane (1996), Brousseau (1997), Hiebert and Wearne (1997), and Boaler (2002). This book is contributing to a related literature on the important role of tasks in teacher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, J. (2000) Conceptualising resources as a theme for mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 205–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(5), 631–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. I. (1993). Towards a pedagogy of confusion. In A. M. White (Ed.), Essays in humanistic mathematics, MAA Notes No. 32 (pp. 107–121). Washington: Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, B., & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 243–307). The Netherlands: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. J., & Hollingsworth, H. (2000). Seeing is understanding: Examining the merits of video and narrative cases. Journal of Staff Development, 21(4), 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 91–119). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, T. J. (1994). Teacher education as an exercise in adaptation. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics: 1994 Yearbook (pp. 9–22). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1997). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse and student learning in second grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Dinur, S. (2007). Teacher flexibility in mathematical discussion. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36(4), 328–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. & Levav-Waynberg, A. (2009). Development of teachers’ conceptions through learning and teaching: Meaning and potential of multiple–solution tasks. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(4), 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. (2001). Instructional explanations: A commonplace for teaching and location for contrast. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th edn., pp. 333–357). Washington: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2004). A deeper look at lesson study. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1–3), 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merseth, K. K., & Lacey, C. A. (1993). Weaving stronger fabric: The pedagogical promise of hypermedia and case methods in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(3), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (1988). School mathematics theorems: An endless source of surprise. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(3), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, I. (2008). Who is the boss? The roles of mathematics and reality in problem solving. In J. Vincent, R. Pierce, & J. Dowsey (Eds.), Connected maths (pp. 274–283). Melbourne: Mathematical Association of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1979). Student perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10(3), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards–based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. (2002). Using the study of practice as a learning strategy within mathematics teacher education programs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(4), 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. (2006). Dichotomies, dilemmas, and ambiguity: Coping with complexity. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(4), 307–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., & Mousley, J. (2001).Thinking teaching: Seeing mathematics teachers as active decision makers. In F-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 147–164). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Mousley, J. (2003). The context of mathematics tasks and the context of the classroom: Are we including all students? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Mousley, J. (2006). Teacher actions to maximize mathematics learning opportunities in heterogeneous classrooms. International Journal for Science and Mathematics Teaching, 4, 117–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (1990). Evoking cognitive conflict to explore preservice teachers’ thinking about division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmy, M., & Chazan, D. (2002). Flux in school algebra: Curricular change, graphing technology, and research on student learning and teacher knowledge. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 725–755). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (2007). Tasks, teacher education, and teacher educators. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Meeting the challenges of mathematics teacher education through design and use of tasks that facilitate teacher learning. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (pp. 93–114). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(4), 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orit Zaslavsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer US

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zaslavsky, O., Sullivan, P. (2011). Setting the Stage: A Conceptual Framework for Examining and Developing Tasks for Mathematics Teacher Education. In: Zaslavsky, O., Sullivan, P. (eds) Constructing Knowledge for Teaching Secondary Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09812-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics