Abstract
This book is about tasks that teacher educators might use with prospective or practicing secondary mathematics teachers. There is a substantial literature that has established the critical role that tasks play in the teaching and learning process for school mathematics classes. Kilpatrick et al. (2001), for example, claim that the quality of teaching depends on whether teachers select cognitively demanding tasks, and whether these tasks unfold in the classroom in ways that allow the students to elaborate on the tasks and learn through those tasks. The basic argument is that it is through and around tasks that teachers and students communicate and learn mathematical ideas, so the tasks used by the teachers become the mediating tools. Christiansen and Walther (1986), drawing on the work of Leont’ev (1978), argued that the tasks set and the associated activity form the basis of the interaction between teaching and learning. Other authors who have similarly emphasized the critical role of tasks in creating learning opportunities for school students as well as the significant influences tasks have on what students actually learn include Stein and Lane (1996), Brousseau (1997), Hiebert and Wearne (1997), and Boaler (2002). This book is contributing to a related literature on the important role of tasks in teacher education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, J. (2000) Conceptualising resources as a theme for mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 205–224.
Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(5), 631–661.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Brown, S. I. (1993). Towards a pedagogy of confusion. In A. M. White (Ed.), Essays in humanistic mathematics, MAA Notes No. 32 (pp. 107–121). Washington: Mathematical Association of America.
Christiansen, B., & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 243–307). The Netherlands: Reidel.
Clarke, D. J., & Hollingsworth, H. (2000). Seeing is understanding: Examining the merits of video and narrative cases. Journal of Staff Development, 21(4), 40–43.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 91–119). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cooney, T. J. (1994). Teacher education as an exercise in adaptation. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics: 1994 Yearbook (pp. 9–22). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath and Co.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1997). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse and student learning in second grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393–425.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington: National Academy Press.
Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–65.
Leikin, R., & Dinur, S. (2007). Teacher flexibility in mathematical discussion. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36(4), 328–347.
Leikin, R. & Levav-Waynberg, A. (2009). Development of teachers’ conceptions through learning and teaching: Meaning and potential of multiple–solution tasks. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(4), 203–223.
Leinhardt, G. (2001). Instructional explanations: A commonplace for teaching and location for contrast. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th edn., pp. 333–357). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Leont’ev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2004). A deeper look at lesson study. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 18–23.
Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243–267.
Mason, J., & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1–3), 163–187.
Merseth, K. K., & Lacey, C. A. (1993). Weaving stronger fabric: The pedagogical promise of hypermedia and case methods in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(3), 283–299.
Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (1988). School mathematics theorems: An endless source of surprise. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(3), 34–40.
Peled, I. (2008). Who is the boss? The roles of mathematics and reality in problem solving. In J. Vincent, R. Pierce, & J. Dowsey (Eds.), Connected maths (pp. 274–283). Melbourne: Mathematical Association of Victoria.
Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975).
Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255–281.
Silver, E. A. (1979). Student perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10(3), 195–210.
Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50–80.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards–based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sullivan, P. (2002). Using the study of practice as a learning strategy within mathematics teacher education programs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(4), 289–292.
Sullivan, P. (2006). Dichotomies, dilemmas, and ambiguity: Coping with complexity. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(4), 307–311.
Sullivan, P., & Mousley, J. (2001).Thinking teaching: Seeing mathematics teachers as active decision makers. In F-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 147–164). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Mousley, J. (2003). The context of mathematics tasks and the context of the classroom: Are we including all students? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 107–121.
Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Mousley, J. (2006). Teacher actions to maximize mathematics learning opportunities in heterogeneous classrooms. International Journal for Science and Mathematics Teaching, 4, 117–143.
Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (1990). Evoking cognitive conflict to explore preservice teachers’ thinking about division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 98–108.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111.
Yerushalmy, M., & Chazan, D. (2002). Flux in school algebra: Curricular change, graphing technology, and research on student learning and teacher knowledge. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 725–755). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 297–321.
Zaslavsky, O. (2007). Tasks, teacher education, and teacher educators. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 433–440.
Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Meeting the challenges of mathematics teacher education through design and use of tasks that facilitate teacher learning. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (pp. 93–114). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(4), 5–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer US
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zaslavsky, O., Sullivan, P. (2011). Setting the Stage: A Conceptual Framework for Examining and Developing Tasks for Mathematics Teacher Education. In: Zaslavsky, O., Sullivan, P. (eds) Constructing Knowledge for Teaching Secondary Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09812-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09812-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09811-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09812-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)