Abstract
Objective: To improve the efficacy of newborn screening (NBS) for very long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCADD).
Patients and Methods: Data on all dried blood spots collected by the Dutch NBS from October 2007 to 2010 (742.728) were included. Based solely on the C14:1 levels (cutoff ≥0.8 μmol/L), six newborns with VLCADD had been identified through NBS during this period. The ratio of C14:1 over C2 was calculated. DNA of all blood spots with a C14:1/C2 ratio of ≥0.020 was isolated and sequenced. Children homozygous or compound heterozygous for mutations in the ACADVL gene were traced back and invited for detailed clinical, biochemical, and genetic evaluation.
Results: Retrospective analysis based on the C14:1/C2 ratio with a cutoff of ≥0.020 identified an additional five children with known ACADVL mutations and low enzymatic activity. All were still asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis (age 2–5 years). Increasing the cutoff to ≥0.023 resulted in a sensitivity of 93% and a positive predictive value of 37%. The sensitivity of the previously used screening approach (C14:1 ≥0.8) was 50%.
Conclusion: This study shows that the ratio C14:1/C2 is a more sensitive marker than C14:1 for identifying VLCADD patients in NBS. However, as these patients were all asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, this suggests that a more sensitive screening approach may also identify individuals who may never develop clinical disease. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to establish the risk of these VLCADD-deficient individuals for developing clinical signs and symptoms.
Competing interests: None declared
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andresen BS, Olpin S, Poorthuis BJ et al (1999) Clear correlation of genotype with disease phenotype in very-long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Am J Hum Genet 64:479–494. doi:10.1086/302261
Baruteau J, Sachs P, Broué P et al (2014) Clinical and biological features at diagnosis in mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation defects: a French pediatric study from 187 patients. Complementary data. J Inherit Metab Dis 37:137–139. doi:10.1007/s10545-013-9628-9
Bonham JR (2013) Impact of new screening technologies: should we screen and does phenotype influence this decision? J Inherit Metab Dis 36:681–686. doi:10.1007/s10545-013-9598-y
Diekman EF, Ferdinandusse S, van der Pol WL et al (2015) Fatty acid oxidation flux predicts the clinical severity of VLCAD deficiency. Genet Med. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.22
Dixon S, Shackley P, Bonham J, Ibbotson R (2012) Putting a value on the avoidance of false positive results when screening for inherited metabolic disease in the newborn. J Inherit Metab Dis 35:169–176. doi:10.1007/s10545-011-9354-0
Gurian EA, Kinnamon DD, Henry JJ, Waisbren SE (2006) Expanded newborn screening for biochemical disorders: the effect of a false-positive result. Pediatrics 117:1915–1921. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2294
Hall PL, Marquardt G, McHugh DMS et al (2014) Postanalytical tools improve performance of newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry. Genet Med. doi:10.1038/gim.2014.62
Hoffmann L, Haussmann U, Mueller M, Spiekerkoetter U (2011) VLCAD enzyme activity determinations in newborns identified by screening: a valuable tool for risk assessment. J Inherit Metab Dis. doi:10.1007/s10545-011-9391-8
Houten SM, Herrema H, te Brinke H et al (2013) Impaired amino acid metabolism contributes to fasting-induced hypoglycemia in fatty acid oxidation defects. Hum Mol Genet 22:5249–5261. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddt382
Kwon JM, Steiner RD (2011) “I‘m fine; I’m just waiting for my disease”: the new and growing class of presymptomatic patients. Neurology 77:522–523. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228c15f
Laforêt P, Acquaviva-Bourdain C, Rigal O et al (2009) Diagnostic assessment and long-term follow-up of 13 patients with Very Long-Chain Acyl-Coenzyme A dehydrogenase (VLCAD) deficiency. Neuromuscul Disord 19:324–329. doi:10.1016/j.nmd.2009.02.007
Lindner M, Hoffmann GF, Matern D (2010) Newborn screening for disorders of fatty-acid oxidation: experience and recommendations from an expert meeting. J Inherit Metab Dis 33:521–526. doi:10.1007/s10545-010-9076-8
Loeber JG, Burgard P, Cornel MC et al (2012) Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 1. From blood spot to screening result. J Inherit Metab Dis 35:603–611. doi:10.1007/s10545-012-9483-0
McHugh DMS, Cameron CA, Abdenur JE et al (2011) Clinical validation of cutoff target ranges in newborn screening of metabolic disorders by tandem mass spectrometry: a worldwide collaborative project. Genet Med 13:230–254. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31820d5e67
Schmidt JL, Castellanos-Brown K, Childress S et al (2012) The impact of false-positive newborn screening results on families: a qualitative study. Genet Med 14:76–80. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.5
Sokol DK (2012) Law, ethics, and the duty of care. BMJ 345, e6804. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228c15f
Timmermans S, Buchbinder M (2010) Patients-in-waiting: Living between sickness and health in the genomics era. J Health Soc Behav 51:408–423. doi:10.1177/0022146510386794
Vianey-Saban C, Divry P, Brivet M et al (1998) Mitochondrial very-long-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency: clinical characteristics and diagnostic considerations in 30 patients. Clin Chim Acta 269:43–62
Vreken P, van Lint AE, Bootsma AH et al (1999) Quantitative plasma acylcarnitine analysis using electrospray tandem mass spectrometry for the diagnosis of organic acidaemias and fatty acid oxidation defects. J Inherit Metab Dis 22:302–306
Waisbren SE, Albers S, Amato S et al (2003) Effect of expanded newborn screening for biochemical genetic disorders on child outcomes and parental stress. JAMA 290:2564–2572. doi:10.1001/jama.290.19.2564
Wanders RJA, Ruiter JPN, IJLst L, et al. (2010) The enzymology of mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation and its application to follow-up analysis of positive neonatal screening results. J Inherit Metab Dis 33:479–494. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9104-8
Wilcken B (2010) Fatty acid oxidation disorders: outcome and long-term prognosis. J Inherit Metab Dis 33:501–506. doi:10.1007/s10545-009-9001-1
Acknowledgments
We are most grateful to Dr. B. Elvers of the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) for providing the selected blood spots for further analyses and to Dr. P. Verkerk of TNO (Applied Scientific Research Institute) and Prof. Dr. E.E.S. Nieuwenhuis of the Wilhelmina’s Children’s Hospital/University Medical Centre Utrecht (WKZ/UMCU) for their biochemical and ethical advice. They were not compensated for their efforts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by: Bridget Wilcken
Appendices
Synopsis
We show that the C14:1/C2 (≥0.023) ratio is a better biomarker (sensitivity 93%) to detect patients with VLCADD compared to C14:1 (≥0.8, sensitivity 50%) and identified five additional patients.
Conflict of Interest
Eugene Diekman has no conflict of interest, Monique de Sain-van der Velden has no conflict of interest, Hans Waterham has no conflict of interest, Leo Kluijtmans has no conflict of interest, Peter Schielen has no conflict of interest, Evert Ben van Veen has no conflict of interest, Sacha Ferdinandusse has no conflict of interest, Frits Wijburg has no conflict of interest, and Gepke Visser has no conflict of interest.
Funding Source
This research was supported by ZonMW (dossier 200320006), Metakids (www.metakids.nl), and the ESN-stimuleringsprijs.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 SSIEM and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Diekman, E. et al. (2015). The Newborn Screening Paradox: Sensitivity vs. Overdiagnosis in VLCAD Deficiency. In: Morava, E., Baumgartner, M., Patterson, M., Rahman, S., Zschocke, J., Peters, V. (eds) JIMD Reports, Volume 27. JIMD Reports, vol 27. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/8904_2015_476
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/8904_2015_476
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-50408-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-50409-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)