Skip to main content

Dynamic Contour Tonometry

  • Chapter
Glaucoma

Part of the book series: Essentials in Ophthalmology ((ESSENTIALS))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argus WA. Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1810–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Duba I, Wirthlin AC. Dynamische Konturtonometrie für post-LASIK — Augendruckmessungen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2004;221:347–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Duch S, Serra A, Castanera J, Abos R, Quintana M. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma 2001;10:261–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975;53:34–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Emara B, Probst LE, Tingey DP, Kennedy DW, Willms LJ, Machat J. Correlation of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in normal myopic eyes and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:1320–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:85–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fournier AV, Podtetenev M, Lemire J et al. Intraocular pressure change measured by Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:905–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fresco BB. A new tonometer — the pressure phosphene tonometer: clinical comparison with Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 1998;105:2123–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Garzozi HJ, Chung HS, Lang Y, Kagemann L, Harris A. Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers. Cornea 2001;20:33–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Ueber Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica 1957;134:221–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann EM, Grus FH, Pfeiffer N. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol 2004;23:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanngiesser HE, Nee M, Kniestedt C et al. Simulation of dynamic contour tonometry compared to in vitro study revealing minimal influence of corneal radius and astigmatism. The theoretical foundations of dynamic contour tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:E-Abstract 2641.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3790–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3118–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1287–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration state. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;243:359–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, Bostrom A, Nee M, Stamper RL. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov;123(11):1532–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Langham ME, McCarthy E. A rapid pneumatic applanation tonometer. Comparative findings and evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 1968;79:389–99.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Madjlessi F, Marx W, Reinhard T et al. Impression and applanation tonometry in irregular corneas. Comparison with intraocular needle tonometry. Ophthalmologe 2000;97:478–81 [in German].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Marx W, Madjlessi F, Reinhard T et al. More than 4 years’ experience with electronic intraocular needle tonometry. Ophthalmologe 1999;96:498–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Naruse S, Mori K, Kojo M, Hieda O, Kinoshita S. Evaluation of intraocular pressure change after laser in situ keratomileusis using the pressure phosphene tonometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:390–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Orssengo GJ, Pye DC. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bull Math Biol 1999;61:551–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Perkins ES. The ocular pulse. Curr Eye Res 1981;1:19–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Recep OF, Cagil N, Hasiripi H. Correlation between intraocular pressure and corneal stromal thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1480–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosa N, Cennamo G, Breve MA, La Rana A. Goldmann applanation tonometry after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:550–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement: comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shah S, Chatterjee A, Mathai M et al. Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2154–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:746–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Simon G, Small RH, Ren Q, Parel JM. Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. Refract Corneal Surg 1993;9:110–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stodtmeister R. Applanation tonometry and correlation according to corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:319–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Velten IM, Bergua A, Horn FK et al. Central corneal thickness in normal eyes, patients with ocular hypertension, normal-pressure and openangle glaucomas: a study. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2001;218:466 [in German].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;15:592–6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wirthlin AC, Siganos DD, Papastergiou G, Kanngiesser H. Dynamic contour tonometry for IOP measurement after LASIK, a comparison with Goldmann tonometry. Synopsis of paper presented at DOC, Nuernberg 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;123:767–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vakili R, Choudhri SA, Tauber S, Shields MB. Effect of mild to moderate myopic correction by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometer, tono-pen, and pneumatonometer. J Glaucoma 2002;11:493–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ventura AC, Bohnke M, Mojon DS. Central corneal thickness in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:792–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zadok D, Tran DB, Twa M, Carpenter M, Schanzlin DJ. Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1344–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneider, E., Kanngiesser, H.E., Kniestedt, C. (2006). Dynamic Contour Tonometry. In: Grehn, F., Stamper, R. (eds) Glaucoma. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34773-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34773-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26220-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34773-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics