Skip to main content

Testing for foods derived from modern biotechnology: opportunities and limitations for metrology

  • Chapter
Traceability in Chemical Measurement
  • 1038 Accesses

Abstract

Various countries have established labeling schemes for food derived from modern biotechnology. As a consequence, test methods need to be available to industry and regulators. The three test options, bioassays, protein-based and DNA-based test methods, are discussed. None of these methods is able to directly measure the percentage of foods derived from modern biotechnology by weight (weight-%), the unit in which most of the thresholds for food labeling in the different countries (if any) have been established. The conversion of the measurement units to weight-% is difficult to achieve and influenced by a number of biological factors. Metrology can aid the standardization of methods enormously by defining clearly the relationships between measurement units and other units of interest (e.g. legal thresholds).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rashid A, O'Donovan JT, Khan AA, Sharma MP, van Nguyen H (1997) Weed Technol 11:527–531

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murray BG, Friesen LF, Beaulieu KJ, Morrison IN (1996) Weed Technol 10:85–89

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stave J (2002) J AOAC Int 85:780–786

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lipton CR, Dautlick JX, Grothaus GD, Hunst PL, Magin KM, Mihaliak CA, Rubio FM, Stave J (2000) Food Agric Immunol 12:153–164

    Google Scholar 

  5. United States Department of Agriculture (2002) Grain Inspection Packers and Stockyards Administration Federal Grain Inspection Service Directive 91812 2-7-02 (http://wwwusdagov/gipsa/reference-library/directives/9181-2pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horwitz (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:331–343

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anklam E, Gadani F, Heinze P, Pijnenburg H, Van Den Eede G (2002) Eur Food Res Technol 214:3–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed F (2002) Trends Biotechnol 20:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hübner P, Waiblinger HU, Pietsch K, Brodmann P (2001) J AOAC Int 84:1855–1864

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lischer P (2002) Mitt Lebensm Hyg 92:290

    Google Scholar 

  11. Remund KM, Dixon DA, Wright DL, Holden LR (2001) Seed Sci Res 11:101

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991) Plant Mol Biol Rep 9:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ho I, Rayburn AL (1991) Plant Sci 74:255–260

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rayburn AL, Pedersen WL, McMurphy LM (1993) Plant Sci 37:79–82

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rayburn AL, McMurphy LM (1991) Crop Sci 31:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trapmann S, Schimmel H, Kramer GN, Van den Eede G, Pauwels J (2002) J AOAC Int 85:775–779

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lipp, M. (2003). Testing for foods derived from modern biotechnology: opportunities and limitations for metrology. In: De Bièvre, P., Günzler, H. (eds) Traceability in Chemical Measurement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27093-0_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics