Skip to main content

CSCL in Higher Education?

A Framework for Designing Multiple Collaborative Environments

  • Chapter
What We Know About CSCL

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 3))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assiter, A. (Ed.). (1995). Transferable skills in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1997a). Towards a higher education for a new century. London: University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1997b). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradner, E., Kellogg, W. A., & Erickson, T. (1999). The adoption and use of babble: A field study of chat in the workplace. Proceedings of the European computer-supported cooperative work 1999 conference (pp. 139–158). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 4, 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T. A. (1998). Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(3), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. K., Moore, D. M., & Holmes, G. A. (1995). Hypermedia concepts and research: An overview. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(3–4), 345–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst, 24(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, C. (1984). Do learners make good choices? A review of research on learner control in instruction. Instructional Innovator, 29(2), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. (Technical Report No. 6899). Cambridge, MA: BBN Labs Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, E. J., & Weil, W. (1997) Wicked problems: Naming the pain in organizations. Retrieved June 12, 2002, from http://www.gdss.com/wp/wicked.htm

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1981). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgarno, B. (1996). Constructivist computer-assisted learning: Theory, technique and tools. Unpublished Master of Science thesis, University of Canberra. Retrieved March 1, 2003, from http://farrer.riv.csu.edu.au/~dalgarno/publications/1998b/chapter5.html

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1903). Studies in logical theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1907). School and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: Pergamon, Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170–198). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1985) The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. In S. P. Robertson, G. M. Olson & J. S. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of the CHI’ 91 conference on human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology (pp. 79–84). New Orleans, LA: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W. (1996). Situating action II: Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P. (1998, March). New technology in higher education: Understanding the innovation process. Keynote at the International Conference on Integrating information and communication Technology in Higher Education (BITE), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computerassisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Development, 7(3), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Knight, P. (1996). Transforming higher education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Mason, S. (1996). A quality graduate. In J. Tait & P. Knight (Eds.), The management of independent learning (pp. 13–28). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honebein, P. C. (1996). Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 11–24). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. (1981). Student-student interaction: The neglected variable in education. Educational Research, 10, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Johnson-Holubec, E. (1992). Advanced cooperative learning. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1993). Creative and critical thinking through academic controversy. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1017–1044). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N., & Bruun, S. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, M. B., & Sullivan, H. J. (1989). Continuing motivation, learner control and CAI. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(2), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. L. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 299–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A. (2000). Using integrated electronic learning environments for collaborative teaching/learning. Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, 2, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. (2002). Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. In P. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 7–47). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Strijbos, J. W., & Kreijns, K. (2003). Designingintegrated electronic collaborative learning environments. In W. M. G. Jochems, J. J. G. Van Merriënboer & R. Koper (Eds.), Integrated E-learning (pp. 24–38). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Carr, C. S., Van Merriënboer, J. & Sloep, P. (2002). How expert designers design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(4), 86–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). Sociability in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology and Society, 5(1), 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukonen, H. (1999). Computer-supported collaborative learning: A review of research and development (The J.H.G.I. Giesbers Reports on Education No. 10). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: University of Nijmegen, Department of Educational Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & ďApollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 449–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. S., Cooper, J. L., Davidson, N., & Hawkes, P. (1995). Building bridges between cooperative and collaborative learning. Change, 27(July/August), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.). Instructional-design theories and models (pp. 279–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1987). The new component design theory: Instructional design for courseware authoring. Instructional Science, 16, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milheim, W. D., & Martin, B. L. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(3), 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirande, M., Riemersma, J., & Veen, W. (1997). De digitale leeromgeving [The digital learning environment]. Hoger Onderwijs Reeks. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., Mason, R. O., & Bonoma, T. V. (1976). Psychological assumptions, experimentation and real world problems. Evaluation Quarterly, 2, 639–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D., & Collins, A. (1996) Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 107–119). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadolski, R. J., Kirschner, P. A., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Hummel, H. G. K. (2001). A model for optimizing step size of learning tasks in competency-based multimedia practicals. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S. (1995). Learning to do and learning to understand. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 37–62). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitz, T. (n.d.). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: a comparison of the two concepts which will help us to understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. Retrieved June 12, 2002, from http://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/coopdefinition.htm

  • Plowman, L., Luckin, R., Laurillard, D., Stratford, M., & Taylor, J. (1999). Designing multimedia for learning: Narrative guidance and narrative construction. In M. G. Williams, M. W. Altom, K. Ehrlich, W. Newman & S. Pemberton (Eds.), Proceedings CHI’ 99: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 310–317). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, K., & Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (1998). Hypermedia and learning styles: Can performance be influenced? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(4), 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 135–144). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. (Original work published as part of ‘Dilemmas in a general theory of planning’, Policy Sciences, 4, 1973, 155–169).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1989). In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: Issues concerning external validity, media replications and learner control. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37, 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyu, H. Y., & Brown, S. W. (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: What are the effects in procedural learning? International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(2), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning in teams: State of the art. Educational Psychologist, 15, 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1986). Using student team learning (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Center for Social Organization of Schools, The Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50, 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1997). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1980). Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Educational Psychologist, 15, 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains (Tech. Rep. No. 441). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the study of reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2003). Meaning and interpretation in collaboration. In P. Dillenbourg (Series Ed.) & B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe. (Vol. Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning: Vol. 2. Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 523–532). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (in press). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers & Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2001). Three worlds of instructional design: State of the art and future directions. Instructional Science, 29, 429–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off the learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 294 754).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 957–983). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W., & Snyder, D. (1996). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 112–142). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kirschner, P.A., Martens, R.L., Strijbos, J.W. (2004). CSCL in Higher Education?. In: Strijbos, JW., Kirschner, P.A., Martens, R.L. (eds) What We Know About CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7921-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7921-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7779-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7921-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics