Skip to main content
Log in

The new Component Design Theory: instructional design for courseware authoring

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines extensions of Component Display Theory to provide the type of design guidance needed for experiential computer based instructional systems. The new Component Design Theory (CDT) extends the original theory in several significant ways. Content types are extended to content structures. These content structures include experiential as well as structural representations. Primary presentation forms are extended to primary presentation functions and the display is replaced by the transaction. Various types of transactions are identified for both structural and experiential representations. Course organization, previously described as Elaboration Theory, is included as part of the new CDT. Consistency rules are extended to include: (a) goal-content representation consistency; (b) goal/content representation-transaction consistency; and (c) goal/content representation-course organization consistency. Intervention rules are included for intra-transaction guidance, inter-transaction selection and sequence (strategy), inter-content representation selection and sequence (sequence) and control (who makes the guidance, strategy and sequence decisions, the learner or the system?). Finally a set of cardinal instructional principles is identified and the sets of rules which comprise the new CDT are suggested as prescribed procedures for implementing these cardinal principles.

1. The preparation of this paper was supported in part by funds provided by The Army Research Institute via Human Technology, Inc. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organization or Human Technology, Inc.

2. Mark Hopkins was a powerful teacher and President of William College of Massachusetts (1836–1872). It is said that the best instructional technique ever devised was Mark Hopkins on one end of a log and a student on the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gagné, R. M. (1965). The Conditions of Learning. (1st Edition) New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. (4th Edition) New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. & Boutwell, R. C. (1973). Instructional development: Methodology and research. In F. N. Kerlinger F. N. Kerlinger (Ed.), Review of research in education (Volume 1). Itasca, N.Y.: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. & Tennyson, R. D. (1977). Teaching Concepts: An Instructional Design Guide. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D., Reigeluth, C. M. & Faust, G. W. (1979). The instructional quality profile: curriculum evaluation and design tool. In H. F. O'NeilJr. (Ed.), Procedures for Instructional Systems Development. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1987a). A Lesson Based on the Component Display Theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1987b). Applying Component Display Theory in the design of courseware. In D. Jonassen (Ed) Instructional Designs for Microcomputer Courseware. Hillsdale, N.J.: Laurence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M., Merrill, M. D. & Bunderson, C. V. (1978). The structure of subject matter content and its instructional design implications. Instructional Science, 7, 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). (ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models: an overview of their current status. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. & Stein, F. S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merrill, M.D. The new Component Design Theory: instructional design for courseware authoring. Instr Sci 16, 19–34 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120003

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120003

Keywords

Navigation