Abstract
Thanks to reputation and gamification mechanisms, collaborative question answering systems coordinate the process of topical knowledge creation of thousands of users. While successful, these systems face many challenges: on one hand, the volume of submitted questions overgrows the amount of new users willing, and capable, of answering them. On the other hand, existing users need to be retained and optimally allocated. Previous work demonstrates the positive effects that two important aspects, namely engagement and expertise valorisation, can have on user quality and quantity of participation. The magnitude of their effect can greatly vary across users and across topics. In this paper we advocate for a more in-depth study of the interplay that exists between user engagement factors in question answering systems. Our working hypothesis is that the process of knowledge creation can be accelerated by better understanding and exploiting the combined effects of the interests and expertise of users, with their intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. We perform a study over 6 years of data from the StackOverflow platform. By defining metrics of expertise and (intrinsic and extrinsic) motivations, we show how they distribute and correlate across platform’s users and topics. By means of an off-line question routing experiment, we show how topic-specific combinations of motivations and expertise can help accelerating the knowledge creation process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., Leskovec, J.: Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: a case study of stack overflow. In: KDD 2012, pp. 850–858. ACM (2012)
Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., Leskovec, J.: Steering user behavior with badges. In: WWW 2013, pp. 95–106. ACM (2013)
Attfield, S., Kazai, G., Lalmas, M., Piwowarski, B.: Towards a science of user engagement. In: WSDM Workshop on User Modelling for Web Applications (2011)
Bosu, A., Corley, C.S., Heaton, D., Chatterji, D., Carver, J.C., Kraft, N.A.: Building reputation in stackoverflow: an empirical investigation. In: MSR 2013, pp. 89–92. IEEE (2013)
Chang, S., Pal, A.: Routing questions for collaborative answering in community question answering. In: ASONAM 2013, pp. 494–501. IEEE/ACM (2013)
Deci, E., Ryan, R.M.: Self-determination Theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology 1, 416–433 (2008)
Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J., Hoffman, R.R.: The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge University Press (2006)
Guo, J., Xu, S., Bao, S., Yu, Y.: Tapping on the potential of q&a community by recommending answer providers. In: CIKM 2008, pp. 921–930. ACM (2008)
Guy, I., Avraham, U., Carmel, D., Ur, S., Jacovi, M., Ronen, I.: Mining expertise and interests from social media. In: WWW 2013, pp. 515–526. ACM (2013)
Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Cumulated Gain-based Evaluation of IR Techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 20(4), 422–446 (2002)
Liu, J., Song, Y.-I., Lin, C.-Y.: Competition-based user expertise score estimation. In: SIGIR 2011, pp. 425–434. ACM (2011)
Nam, K.K., Ackerman, M.S., Adamic, L.A.: Questions in, knowledge in?: a study of naver’s question answering community. In: SIGCHI 2009, pp. 779–788. ACM (2009)
Pal, A., Farzan, R., Konstan, J.A., Kraut, R.E.: Early detection of potential experts in question answering communities. In: Konstan, J.A., Conejo, R., Marzo, J.L., Oliver, N. (eds.) UMAP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6787, pp. 231–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Pal, A., Wang, F., Zhou, M.X., Nichols, J., Smith, B.A.: Question routing to user communities. In: CIKM 2013, pp. 2357–2362. ACM (2013)
Ravi, S., Pang, B., Rastogi, V., Kumar, R.: Great question! question quality in community q&a. In: ICWSM 2014, pp. 426–435. AAAI (2014)
Yang, J., Hauff, C., Bozzon, A., Houben, G.J.: Asking the right question in collaborative q&a systems. In: Hypertext 2014, pp. 179–189. ACM (2014)
Yang, J., Tao, K., Bozzon, A., Houben, G.-J.: Sparrows and owls: characterisation of expert behaviour in stackoverflow. In: Dimitrova, V., Kuflik, T., Chin, D., Ricci, F., Dolog, P., Houben, G.-J. (eds.) UMAP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8538, pp. 266–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Yang, L., Qiu, M., Gottipati, S., Zhu, F., Jiang, J., Sun, H., Chen, Z.: CQARank: jointly model topics and expertise in community question answering. In: CIKM 2013, pp. 99–108. ACM (2013)
Zhang, J., Ackerman, M.S., Adamic, L.: Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. In: WWW 2007, pp. 221–230. ACM (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yang, J., Bozzon, A., Houben, GJ. (2015). Harnessing Engagement for Knowledge Creation Acceleration in Collaborative Q&A Systems. In: Ricci, F., Bontcheva, K., Conlan, O., Lawless, S. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. UMAP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20266-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20267-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)