Overview
- Authors:
-
-
T. C. Hsu
-
Section of Cytology, Department of Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, Houston, USA
-
Kurt Benirschke
-
Department of Pathology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, USA
Access this book
Other ways to access
Table of contents (50 chapters)
-
Artiodactyla
-
Bovidae
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 157-159
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 161-163
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 165-167
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 169-171
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 173-175
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 177-179
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 181-183
-
Primates
-
Tupaiidae
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 185-187
-
Cebidae
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 189-191
-
Callithricidae
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 193-195
-
- T. C. Hsu, Kurt Benirschke
Pages 197-199
-
Back Matter
Pages 201-204
About this book
In recent years, because of advances in karyological techniques, we have witnessed a remarkable renewal of interest in studies of mammalian chromosomes. These techniques, generally involving the use of tissue culture, colchicine and hypotonic solution pretreatments, allow for a much clearer display of metaphase chromosomes of mammalian cells than the classic direct squash or tissue section methods. Consequently, what was known about the chromosome complement of most mammals must be revised. The most astonishing revision, of course, was that made by Tjio and Levan in 1956, who demonstrated that the diploid number of man is 46, not 48 as previously believed. Similar revisions will have to be made for many other mammalian species, either in number or in karyotype structure. Many animals are being examined cytologically for the first time. The findings are now extensive and scattered; they appear in numer ous periodicals and newsletters, or they are kept in cytologists' file drawers without being published. It is difficult to have access to perti nent data for comparison among related species or for evaluation of various karyological characteristics within a karyotype. Such evaluations can be done only when reasonably uniform material is collected and placed side by side for comparison, accompanied by relative references. We considered that probably an Atlas of Mammalian Chromosomes would fulfill such a need. Needless to say, it is impossible to present karyotypes of all mam malian species at one time.
Authors and Affiliations
-
Section of Cytology, Department of Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, Houston, USA
T. C. Hsu
-
Department of Pathology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, USA
Kurt Benirschke