Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of MC-50 and ANITA neutron beams by using 55 nm SRAM

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single event upset (SEU) is mainly caused by neutrons in the terrestrial environment. In addition, SEU effects become more and more problematic as technology scales. It is, therefore, important to understand the SEU behaviors of semiconductor devices under neutron reactions. ANITA (atmospheric-like neutrons from thick target) in TSL (The Svedberg Laboratory), Sweden, resembles the neutron energy and flux spectrum to neutrons at the terrestrial level and are typically used to estimate the soft error rate (SER). On the other hand, the neutron energy and flux spectrum from the MC-50 cyclotron at KIRAMS (Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences) differs greatly from the atmospheric environment. The main objective of this work is finding the efficacy of the neutron beam at KIRAMS for a SEU analysis by using a comparative analysis; 55 nm SRAM is used to determine SEU difference under the beams at two different locations. Since MCU (multi-cell upset) is the dominant effect in emerging technologies with smaller critical charges, the MCU cross sections from the two different beam tests are compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. V. Prokofiev, J. Blomgren, M. Majerle, R. Nolte, S. Röttger, S. P. Platt, C. X. Xiao and A. N. Smirnov, in IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop (Quebec, Canada, July 20–24, 2009), p. 166.

  2. T. Nakamura et al., Terrestrial Neutron-Induced Soft Errors in Advanced Memory Devices (World Scientific, Singapore, 2008), p. 140.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. JEDEC Standard, JESD89A, 2006.

  4. K. Johansson, P. Dyreklev, B. Granbom, N. Olsson, J. Blomgren and P. U. Renberg, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 45, 2519 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. K. Park, S. G. Kwon, S. W. Lee, J. T. Kim, J. S. Chai, J. W. Shin and S. W. Hong, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 58, 1511 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J.W. Shin, T. S. Park, S.W. Hong, J. K. Park, J. T. Kim and J. S. Chai, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59, 2022 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Ibe, S. Chung, S. Wen, H. Yamaguchi, Y. Yahagi, H. Kameyama, S. Yamamoto and T. Akioka, in IEEE Custom Integrated Circuit Conf. (San Jose, USA, September 10–13, 2006).

  8. G. R. Srinvasan, IBM J. Res. Dev. 40, 1 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Watanabe, in Symposium on Nuclear Data (Tokai, Japan, February 2–3, 2006).

  10. P. Reviriego, J. A. Maestro, S. Baeg, S. Wen and R. Wong, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57, 4 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Baeg, S. Wen and R. Wong, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 56, 2111 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanghyeon Baeg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baeg, S., Lee, S., Bak, G.Y. et al. Comparative study of MC-50 and ANITA neutron beams by using 55 nm SRAM. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 61, 749–753 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.61.749

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.61.749

Keywords

Navigation