Abstract
In sequences of identical auditory stimuli, infrequent deviant stimuli elicit an event-related brain potential component called mismatch negativity (MMN). MMN is presumed to reflect the existence of a memory trace of the frequent stimulus at the moment of presentation of the infrequent stimulus. This hypothesis was tested by applying the recognition-masking paradigm of cognitive psychology. In this paradigm, a masking sound presented shortly before or after a test stimulus diminishes the recognition memory of this stimulus, the more so the shorter the interval between the test and masking stimuli. This interval was varied in the present study. It was found that the MMN amplitude strongly correlated with the subject’s ability to discriminate between frequent and infrequent stimuli. This result strongly suggests that MMN providesa measure for a trace of sensory memory, and further, that with MMN, this memory can be studied without performance-related distortions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alho, K., Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Reinikainen, K., &Näätänen, R. (1989). Event-related brain potentials reflecting processing of relevant and irrelevant stimuli during selective listening.Psychophysiology,26, 514–528.
Alho, K., Woods, D. L., Algazi, A., &Näätanen, R. (1992). Intermodal selective attention: D. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,82, 356–368.
Cowan, N. (1984). On short and long auditory stores.Psychological Bulletin,96, 341–370.
Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system.Psychological Bulletin,104, 163–191.
Dixon, W. J. (1985).BMDP Statistical Software manual. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Foyle, D. C, &Watson, C. S. (1984). Stimulus-based versus performance-based measurement of auditory backward recognition masking.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 515–522.
Giard, M.-H., Perrin, F., Pernier, J., &Bouchet, P. (1990). Brain generators implicated in processing of auditory stimulus deviance: A topographic event-related potential study.Psychophysiology,27, 627–640.
Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M., Ilmoniemi, R., Kaukoranta, E., Reinikainen, K., Salminen, J., Alho, K., Näätänen, R., &Sams, M. (1984). Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: Neuromagnetic recordings in man.Neuroscience Letters,50, 127–132.
Hawkins, H. L., &Presson, J. C. (1986). Auditory information processing. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 26.1–26.64). New York: Wiley.
Mäntysalo, S., &Näätänen, R. (1987). The duration of a neuronal trace of an auditory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials.Biological Psychology,24, 183–195.
Massaro, D. W. (1976). Auditory information processing. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and memory (pp. 275–320). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Massaro, D. W., Cohen, M. M., &Idson, W. L. (1976). Recognition masking of auditory lateralization and pitch judgments.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,59, 434–441.
Näätänen, R. (1985). Selective attention and stimulus processing: Reflections in event-related potentials, magnetoencephalogram, and regional cerebral blood flow. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 355–373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,13, 201–288.
Näätänen, R. (1992).Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Brlbaum.
Näätänen, R., &Gaillard, A. W. K. (1983). The orienting reflex and the N2 deflection of the ERP. In A. W. K. Gaillard & W. Ritter (Eds.),Tutorials in event-related potential research: Endogenous components (pp. 119–141). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., &Sams, M. (1989). Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain?Neuroscience Letters,98, 217–221.
Näätänen, R., Sams, M., Järvilehto, T., &Soininen, K. (1983). Probability of deviant stimulus and event-related brain potentials. In R. Sinz & M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds.),Psychophysiology 1980 (pp. 397–405). Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag; Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical.
Sams, M., Alho, K., &Näätänen, R. (1983). Sequential effects in the ERP in discriminating two stimuli.Biological Psychology,17, 41–58.
Sams, M., Alho, K., &Näätänen, R. (1984). Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP.Psychophysiology,21, 434–441.
Winkler, I., &Näätänen, R. (1992). Event-related potentials in auditory backward recognition masking: A new way to study the neurophysiological basis of sensory memory in humans.Neuroscience Letters,140, 239–242.
Winkler, I., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M., &Näätänen, R. (1990). The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus.Psychophysiology,27, 228–235.
Winkler, I., Paavilainen, P., &Näätänen, R. (1992). Can echoic memory store two traces simultaneously? A study of event-related brain potentials.Psychophysiology,29, 337–349.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Academy of Finland and the National Scientific Fund of Hungary (OTKA)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winkler, I., Reinikainen, K. & Näätänen, R. Event-related brain potentials reflect traces of echoic memory in humans. Perception & Psychophysics 53, 443–449 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206788
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206788