Abstract
We present four experiments in which we examined the effects of color mixing andprior target color knowledge on preview search (Watson & Humphreys, 1997). The task was to detect a target letter (an N or a Z) that appeared along with other new letters, when old distractors remained in the visual field. In some conditions, participants were told the target’s color; in others, they were not. Foreknowledge of the target’s color produced large improvements in search for both baseline and preview presentations (Experiment 1). For preview presentations, the magnitude of this effect was reduced if the target shared its color with a single colored set of previewed letters (Experiment 2). Removing this similarity across the displays greatly improved search efficiency (Experiment 3). In Experiment 4, we assessed and rejected the proposal that the effects reflected the probability that the target was carried by a particular color. We discuss the results in terms of separate effects of (1) inhibitory carryover from a preview color group and (2) an anticipatory set for a known target color.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D. A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1997). Goal-directed guidance of attention: Evidence from conjunctive visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 948–961.
Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Hodsoll, J. (2002).Ignoring color over time: The selective effects of color on preview-based visual search of static items. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Hodsoll, J. (in press). Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carry-over effects in preview search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Bravo, M. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. Oxford: Pergamon.
Cave, K. R. (1999). The FeatureGate model of visual selection.Psychological Research,62, 182–194.
Cave, K. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.Cognitive Psychology,22, 225–271.
Donk, M., &Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 891–900.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., &Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 32–39.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. W. (1996). When knowledge does not help: Limitations on the flexibility of attentional control. In A. F. Kramer (Ed.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 271–297). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R., &Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 682–685.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 317–329.
Gibson, B. S., &Jiang, Y. (2001). Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 59–73.
Gibson, B. S., &Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional-set for displaywide visual features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 699–706.
Hillstrom, A. P., &Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 399–411.
Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., &Jolicoeur, P. (2002). Fractionating visual marking: Dual-task decomposition of the marking state by timing and modality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 640–660.
Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., &van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1053–1069.
Kim, M.-S., &Cave, K. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1009–1023.
Kim, M.-S., &Cave, K. R. (2001). Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task.Vision Research,41, 611–624.
Klein, R. (2000). Inhibition of return.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 138–145.
Koshino, H. (2001). Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 294–300.
Kwak, H.-W., &Egeth, H. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 455–464.
Moore, C. M., &Egeth, H. (1998). How does feature-based attention affect visual processing?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1296–1310.
Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Neumann, E., &DeSchepper, B. G. (1991). Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 1136–1145.
Olivers, C. N. L., &Humphreys, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down limited capacity inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 22–42.
Olivers, C. N. L., Humphreys, G. W., Heinke, D., &Cooper, A. C. G. (2002). Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 540–560.
Olivers, C. N. L., Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 679–715.
Poisson, M. E., &Wilkinson, F. (1992). Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual search.Perception,21, 21–38.
Snyder, J. J., &Kingstone, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited?Perception & Psychophysics,62, 452–458.
Sobel, K. V., & Cave, K. R. (in press). The role of salience and strategy in conjunction search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J. (1993). Visual selective attention: A theoretical analysis.Acta Psychologica,83, 93–154.
Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 799–806.
Theeuwes, J. (1996). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 297–315). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., &Atchley, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 130–134.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory effects of ignored primes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., &Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 492–504.
Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., &Weaver, B. (1991). Object centered inhibition of return of visual attention [short report].Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 289–298.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., &Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 841–864.
Treisman, A. (1993). The perception of features and objects. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Attention: Selection, awareness and control. A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 5–35). New York: Oxford University Press.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Treue, S., &Martinez Trujillo, J. C. (1999). Reshaping neuronal representations of visual scenes through attention.Current Psychology of Cognition,18, 951–972.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.Psychological Review,104, 90–122.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1–17.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 471–481.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Visual marking and visual change.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 379–395.
Yantis, S. (1993a). Stimulus-driven attentional capture.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2, 156–161.
Yantis, S. (1993b). Stimulus driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 676–681.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Yantis, S., &Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 135–149.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Zohary, E., &Hochstein, S. (1989). How serial is serial processing in vision?Perception,18, 191–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a Ph.D. studentship from the School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, awarded to the first author, and by a program grant for the MRC to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braithwaite, J.J., Humphreys, G.W. Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 213–237 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194796
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194796